I gave "Battle Lines" a pretty low score. I actually found a lot of it very forced and unmoving.

I gave "Battle Lines" a pretty low score. I actually found a lot of it very forced and unmoving.
Nah, I'm just busy. I expect once I start my thread people will abandon these pretender threads and flock to my awesome reviews.^ So are you waiting until star is finished before starting your review thread?
I finished B5, I have to finish Crusade and the final two movies. (Can you blame me for being reluctant in going back?I think he technically still has to finish B5.![]()
It does have a lasting impact, but I think it was silly for DS9 to get rid of Opaka without exploring her character a little more, we really could have done with an Opaka episode that shows why she was so loved, then her loss would have had more of an immediate impact. Also, they pretty much kill her off but we never get to see Bajor grieve for her; she leaves Bajor never to return, and a few months later there's an election to replace her. There's a big gap there.
Perhaps, I'll have to evaluate it once I get around to reviewing the show. But my impression is that Vortex didn't throw away an important character before they could be explored properly, Battle Lines did, and that's a little irritating.Still, in the context of the real season one, which is admittedly rather unfocused compared to what will follow, I think Battle Lines is in the same solid group of episodes as Vortex: they're not perfect, but they bring some substance to the table and have some impact on character development.
Don't worry, I didn't reveal the reason why the Romulans blew up Sisko; because he gave Senator Vreenak that fake pen that squirted ink on his shirt. That Sisko sure does love practical jokes.That said, I really wish that you had not revealed the truth about the secret Romulan explosive device hidden within the baseball, that was quite inconsiderate on your part![]()
Funny you should say that. This episode was written for TNG's first season but unused then and adapted to DS9 later.And when the first season does focus on Bajor, it does episodes like this.The Storyteller
♥♥♥♥♥----- (5/10)Once again, it's a TNG plot grafted onto Bajor rather than trying to tell a story about Bajor.
It's like meeting someone that has a chess-set and asking if you want a game, and they set up a game of checkers. There's nothing wrong with checkers, it can be a challenging game when played against a smart opponent, but I was really hoping for a game of chess, and it seems like a waste to use these pieces that way.Yeah, Opaka's rather sudden departure from the series was really strange. That was a big chunk of why I didn't find the episode so hot. She seemed poised for relevance in the pilot, then disappeared for a dozen episodes, then came back and disappeared.
Ah yes, nothing says quality like an episode was wasn't considered good enough for the first season of TNG.Funny you should say that. This episode was written for TNG's first season but unused then and adapted to DS9 later.
I think this episode is okay, but when I think about it I'm not sure why. I liked the Odo/Lwaxana stuff, I think this was her best DS9 appearance, but other than that it's a technobabble plot. If you want to be really generous you could say that Bashir being forced to spend time with a group of irritating ambassadors is one of the things that convinced him to tone down his own annoying behaviour, but that's really stretching it.The Forsaken
♥♥-------- (2/10)
Ah, but DS9 was built by the Cardassians and they have no comparable stories to 2001 as all their works of fiction are about duty to the state.Summary: All I could think when O'Brien realizes that a life form had infiltrated the computer was: "Hello, Dave."I suppose that the lesson that could be taken from this episode is perhaps we should ALWAYS have manual overrides for emergencies for EVERYTHING... just in case the computer develops sentience and decides it doesn't much care for biological beings.
I like this one based purely on nostalgia, it's one of the earliest episodes I remember and when I was younger I always tried to watch this episode in repeats, but I always ended up catching Babel instead for some reason.Dramatis Personae
♥♥♥♥------ (4/10)
WORSTDuet
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ (10/10)
My second favourite episode of the season, and a good set-up for season 2.In the Hands of Prophets
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥-- (8/10)
"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"The good: Good premise, pacing was decent, if a little slow at times. Well acted.
While that's true of Winn, the episode doesn't claim that all religious people are like that and the episode also introduces Bareil, who is portrayed as a compassionate man that uses his faith almost entirely for good. That's what I like DS9's portrayal of religion, it shows various aspects of religion rather than just focusing on the positives or negatives. There's Kira, the average religious person that uses their faith as a source of strength. There's Bareil, who's uses his faith and his status for good. There's Winn, who uses other people's faith as a means to gain power and influence. And later in the series there's a character that's "programmed" to believe in his gods and uses that faith to justify his immoral actions.The bad: Not really a crit, but I always cringe whenever I see something that has to do with religious fanatics. More because I am a deeply religious person and I suffer from getting prejudged by people who have been hurt by nut cases that use religion as their vehicle for narcism. It's difficult for me to watch something like this and not want to scream that everyone is NOT that nuts when it comes to faith. I think that I probably struggled with that in this episode the most. I realize that my personal experience perhaps colored my view but hey... I never said my reviews are anything but opinions.![]()
DS9 doesn't do cliffhangers in a traditional sense, there's no "Mr Worf, fire!" in any of the season finales. DS9 prefers to use the season finale to set up the following season and to provide shocking revelations that shake up the status quo. I think it was a smart move, TNG's finales were a case of diminishing returns, and while Voyager had some good ones (Scorpion and Equinox) the concept felt a little stale at that point.Summary: A good finale. I appreciate that there wasn't a cliff-hanger (even if I won't have to wait a year for it to be resolved).
I agree, season 2 is where I think the show starts to come together. Some think it happened in season 3 or 4, but I think that season 2 is where they started focusing on DS9 issues more and dropped the number of TNG-plots. There's a number of poor episodes in season 2, but there's also many more classic episodes than there are in season 1.In the second season, you're going to find some stinkers again (I've enjoyed most of them, but I can tell you're a bit more opinionated!) but there are some more real gems, and overall there's a much stronger sense of a lot of very good things. The camaraderie between characters begins to feel more real, the 'DS9 episodes for DS9' becomes much more prevalent and the writing in general feels more crisp on average.
To Cardassians, all computers are productive computers that will never rebel.
Poland.
Contrary to popular opinion that Cardies were Nazi and Bajorans wereJews, I see it more like Nazi and Eastern European countries, which were occupied by Nazi, where were camps and all those real life atrocities happened.
I'm a bit of a student of history and I find your country quite interesting.
I see the Dominion's rule of Cardassia very close to Stalin's Soviet Union.I find that often, I see the Cardassians as being like the Russians under Stalin's rule.
Isn't that exactly trivializing the horrors the Jewish people were subjected to? Let's be real, people, Jews under Hitler would have been lucky to have it as comparably as "good" as the Bajorans - does anyone think that Jews would have been able to live for 50 years under the Third Reich and lose only a fraction of the population (10 million out of billions for Bajorans, and that over the course of half a century - and that with a much more advanced technology)? Cardassian attitude to the Bajorans is more like Nazi Germans' attitude to the nations they occupied, or European colonialism; they considered the Bajorans inferior and believed they had the right to occupy and exploit their planet and enslave its people - but they did not intend nor try to completely wipe out the Bajorans as a race, there was no "Final Solution". By contrast, Jews were considered not just a lower race by the Nazis, they were considered subhuman vermin, a pest that needs to be eradicated. Anyone who compares Bajorans to the Jews is severely underestimating the horrors of the Holocaust.Poland.
Contrary to popular opinion that Cardies were Nazi and Bajorans wereJews, I see it more like Nazi and Eastern European countries, which were occupied by Nazi, where were camps and all those real life atrocities happened.
That is a solid interpretation and I can definitely see where you're coming from. Not to trivialize the horrors that the Jewish people were subjected to, but I think people typically pick the Jews for Bajorans because of the sensationalism attached there.
DevilEyes;4417234"In the Hands of the Prophets" was an excellent episode. I don't understand why you would be bothered by the portrayal of religious people said:star[/B] - it's actually one of the first examples of Trek dealing with religion in a layered and objective way (DS9 will do that a lot). You can't say that there aren't people like Winn out there, can you? Very much so. But, as TheGodBen pointed out, there are very different religious people in the episode - from Winn and Neela to Bareil and Kira - and we see that religion can be used both for good and for bad.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.