It sounds like MLB is saying that, since this technology could potentially be abused, we shouldn't allow it. We might as well shut down the Internet, then--lots of abuse going on there, and it's definitely not all hypothetical!
Your position doesn't amount to much. As long as the parents are OK with this there is really nothing shady going on here. We could discuss the implications of RFID tracking in general, which are admittedly a bit spooky but have been absurdly blown out of proportion. For instance, scanning range for RFID chips is not that far. It's not like having a GPS embedded in you so someone can track your every movement. It's only relevant when you come near an RFID sensor.
Mr. Laser Beam,
Tell me about itIt sounds extremely creepy and invasive.
It doesn't really explicitly say whether the students are aware of their being tracked or not...(Do the kids even *know* they're being tracked?)
Your position doesn't amount to much. As long as the parents are OK with this there is really nothing shady going on here. We could discuss the implications of RFID tracking in general, which are admittedly a bit spooky but have been absurdly blown out of proportion. For instance, scanning range for RFID chips is not that far. It's not like having a GPS embedded in you so someone can track your every movement. It's only relevant when you come near an RFID sensor.
I'll bet a good deal of the people complaining about this are voluntarily carrying devices that would allow people to track them without their permission, should someone choose to do so.
Do any of you people complaining about this carry cell phones?
Do any of you people complaining about this carry cell phones?
I don't.
Maybe no one *here* is suggesting that, but somewhere else, somebody's thinking about it. You can be sure of that.
As for older children, surely you remember the thing about the laptops being used to spy on students?
It sounds like MLB is saying that, since this technology could potentially be abused, we shouldn't allow it. We might as well shut down the Internet, then--lots of abuse going on there, and it's definitely not all hypothetical!
So this is like wearing a com-badge while you're on the Enterprise?![]()
I have yet to see a cogent argument for how this system is "invasive" and violates anyone's expectations of privacy or safety during school hours while on school grounds.
Considering that school systems around the country are being told to do more & more with less & less (a situation that is only gotten worse in the recession) I can understand the desire to find any tool to help ease the burden on the staff.
These tags would not replace adult supervision but be used as a tool to take over time-consuming administrative functions so that teachers & staff can focus on more constructive time with the kids.
This is bad how, exactly?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.