His thievery didn't really surprise me, but what he did to the guy lying on the ground did.
I had a feeling it was coming, amply foreshadowed by what he did to Crystal's father. Sam's not at all a nice guy when pushed.
His thievery didn't really surprise me, but what he did to the guy lying on the ground did.
Killing the girl by accident/self defense, is a dark side, him being a thief is a dark side, him killing a defenseless person in cold blood is pretty much irredeemable, and I think they ruined the character.
Maybe that's why he's so dark and brooding all the time. Why he keeps his past tightly hidden. Why he goes out of his way to try to be a good man now. And why, despite that, he's still obviously haunted by something in his past and willing to drop everything to escape at a moment's notice.Killing the girl by accident/self defense, is a dark side, him being a thief is a dark side, him killing a defenseless person in cold blood is pretty much irredeemable, and I think they ruined the character.
Guns with wooden bullets and wooden swords, body armor lined with silver. Silver handcuffs for retention. Thats all you need.
Sam killed the guy in a fit of rage. He clearly had feelings for the girl, even though she betrayed him. It was completely irrational and bestial. Consider Sam's a shifter who barely understands who and what he is, it makes complete sense that he'd snap and shoot the person responsible for making him shoot the girl -- in his mind at the time, anyway.Sam had no good reason to shoot that man. It's something different to kill in order to survive like vampires have done it in the past or to shoot someone by accident like it happened to Sam and the woman. But the man was already on the ground and defenceless. Killing him was not necassary IMO. Sam could still be a dark and brooding character even without the killing. I believe being abandoned by the biological parents and then being abandoned again by the adoptive parents at the age of 15 (?) plus being a shifter and a thief pretty much does the trick. Making him a murderer was unnecessary. The point was already made.
Edited to add: Vampires who still kill in cold blood should be hold responsible. The only reason why they are not, is that they are too powerfull.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.