How Star Trek XI Should Have Ended

[Admiral Shran]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbJ-y6BWfUc

 

[T'Girl]

At least the level of acting was better.

 

[Shazam!]

You know, the Enterprise going into the black hole and emerging in some fucked-up universe would've been a pretty great ending.

 

[RegFan]

I especially liked the part with the redshirts.

 

[captcalhoun]

i love the 'lens flare generators'...

 

[Orcus]

Nice...

 

[klingonmaquis]

Perhaps by never being filmed would have been the best ending.

 

[captcalhoun]

true.

 

[Warped9]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbJ-y6BWfUc

Perhaps by never being filmed would have been the best ending.

True.

 

[FalTorPan]

i love the 'lens flare generators'...

As I watched the cartoon, I thought that, once the lens flare generators had been switched off, the ship would have had enough power to blast free from the black hole. :-D

 

[Shatnertage]

Funny--thanks for sharing it.

 

[Sector 7]

Why is another ST09 bashing thread hiding in GTD?

 

[Warped9]

Why is another ST09 bashing thread hiding in GTD?

It's a gift that keeps on giving.

 

[Amaris]

Scotty's quick change to a yellow shirt.
As for the ending, meh. I'm a Trek fan more than a Star Wars fan.

 

[Alidar Jarok]

Why is another ST09 bashing thread hiding in GTD?

We don't really need any nattering nabobs of negativism at the moment. We got your notification. I'll find out if it was recently posted in Trek XI and, if not, we'll move it.

 

[-Brett-]

STAR TREK: 1982-2005

These sigs are getting stranger by the day.

Star Trek started with a sequel?

 

[caisson2delta]

The lens flare generators was classic.

 

[I am not Spock]

STAR TREK: 1982-2005

These sigs are getting stranger by the day.

Star Trek started with a sequel?

I know.. its weird. For me, its Star Trek (1964-) (twas born with 'The Cage' in 64). It aint dead yet. It had a pretty serious cardiac failure with the cancellation of Enterprise back in 05, but its doing well at the moment, thankyou!

 

[Admiral Shran]

STAR TREK: 1982-2005

These sigs are getting stranger by the day.

Star Trek started with a sequel?

My reason for the sig is that TOS is my least favorite series.

Orginially it read "STAR TREK: 1979-2005".

However, I feel that there more of a connection between TOS and TMP than between anything that came after. So, I changed it to 1982.

Mostly, it's just to get a rise out of people.

Why is another ST09 bashing thread hiding in GTD?

We don't really need any nattering nabobs of negativism at the moment.

Spiro Agnew's alliterative epithets live on.

 

[Alidar Jarok]

Glad somebody got the reference. TrekXI informs me that this video has appeared there many, many times, so, rather than give it to them again, I am going to close it down. Send questions or comments via PM.