I don't really care about explanations in Doctor Who - the "science" has always been rubbish. Just say a nanogene did it and be done. 

Doctor Who isnt Voyager, expect for that one episode that was all about nanogenes.I don't really care about explanations in Doctor Who - the "science" has always been rubbish. Just say a nanogene did it and be done.![]()
Doctor Who isnt Voyager, expect for that one episode that was all about nanogenes.I don't really care about explanations in Doctor Who - the "science" has always been rubbish. Just say a nanogene did it and be done.![]()
to be fair that was a good episode.Doctor Who isnt Voyager, expect for that one episode that was all about nanogenes.I don't really care about explanations in Doctor Who - the "science" has always been rubbish. Just say a nanogene did it and be done.![]()
Except for that brilliant episode that was all about nanogenes.![]()
At least there was a decent explanation there. Through her admitting to be his mother they recognized that his DNA and physiology should be like hers and could fix their mistakes.No, that's a Moffat trope, too. I mean, the nanogenes just happen to figure out that they weren't supposed to turn the Human race into gas-mask zombies because Nancy finally said she was the Child's mummy and that she loved him? Seriously? If that's not a "the power of love conquers all" moment, I don't know what is.written specifically to be the "moment" in the episode where "emotions conquer all" is, by plot definition, Russel Davies.
And more effective from a storytelling viewpoint. It may not be entirely logical, but a bomb turning itself off because it can love has no logic whatsoever.At least there was a decent explanation there. Through her admitting to be his mother they recognized that his DNA and physiology should be like hers and could fix their mistakes.No, that's a Moffat trope, too. I mean, the nanogenes just happen to figure out that they weren't supposed to turn the Human race into gas-mask zombies because Nancy finally said she was the Child's mummy and that she loved him? Seriously? If that's not a "the power of love conquers all" moment, I don't know what is.
Yeah, that's a bullshit explanation. Why would the nanogenes recognize the basic "Human" template rather than the specific "Injured Little Boy" template then instead of any of the other five million Humans they'd encountered?
Let's face it -- it was just a "power of love triumphs" moment, just like in "Victory of the Daleks." The one in "The Doctor Dances" was just more emotionally effective.
That's where I've seen the actor who played Churchill before. He looked very familiar and I knew I had seen him before. He was Fulton Greenwall in Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls. That's awesome.
there is an article where Moffatt says that RTDs gets criticism for stuff, but he himself does it all, just worse. Actually it might have been Confidential.
Fans are going to have to live with those things in the 11th Doctor, and learn to detach them from RTDs.
Some already are, claiming that the show has lost it's heart and soul, and that RTD could write characters so beautifully well, while this season so far has failed to do so.Hmm, I wonder how soon people will start missing RTD.
...RTD could write characters so beautifully well...
...while this season so far has failed to do so.
The plot is still pretty ridiculous and nonsensical of course, but somehow... I didn't really mind as much. Once you accept it as just a crazy adventure, it actually kinda works.
The plot is still pretty ridiculous and nonsensical of course, but somehow... I didn't really mind as much. Once you accept it as just a crazy adventure, it actually kinda works.
Isn't this kind of the epitath for DW in general?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.