• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Castle: "The Late Shift" 4/12/10 - Grading & Discussion

Grading

  • Excellent

    Votes: 3 23.1%
  • Above average

    Votes: 7 53.8%
  • Average

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Below average

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Poor

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    13

Aragorn

Fleet Admiral
Admiral
castlecst.jpg


Castle appears on a late-night talk show to promote his new book, Heat Wave. In a commercial break the host Bobby Mann whispers to Castle, "They want me dead". The next day he is found dead of natural causes and its up to Castle to convince Beckett to investigate the case as a murder. Meanwhile, Castle is seduced by Ellie, the guest star to appear on the show the night he died.
 
The premise here seemed a bit too Murder, She Wrote to me -- the protagonist goes somewhere and someone he meets just happens to die. I guess it's acceptable, though, since the talk-show host was specifically hoping to solicit Castle's help, so he could've arranged to book Castle for just that reason. That makes it less of a coincidence. Still, after the earlier episode where the husband-to-be of the ex-love-of-Castle's-life was murdered, it's nudging a li-i-ittle close to Jessica Fletcher territory.

I'm glad there wasn't as much bouncing between suspects as usual; instead a lot of the detective work was about, first, determining whether it was a murder, and after that, trying to reconstruct the victim's activities and find out where and when he was poisoned. That was a nice break from the formula.

Unfortunately, it was a very easy mystery to solve. As soon as they showed that Mann had crossed out "boys" in his signoff line in favor of more gender-neutral alternatives, I knew it meant he was going to ditch Fred Willard and that that was a motive for murder. And the longer Beckett and Castle went without addressing that clue, the clearer it became that my conclusion would turn out to be right. That's a problem with this show's writing sometimes -- the characters overlooking an obvious clue in order to stretch out the mystery to an hour. It doesn't make them look good when they spend several days in-story before catching onto something that the viewer sees instantly.

How many times has Fred Willard played a talk show co-host? That was the very first role I ever saw him in, as Martin Mull's co-host on Fernwood 2 Night way back in 1977.

I just bet the July release date they mentioned for the paperback of Heat Wave is the real release date. I wonder if there's any chance they'd actually make a movie out of it. It'd be a bit redundant, but it'd score points for commitment to the metafiction.
 
Tonight's episode really ... didn't work for me. And next week's trailer - yeah I know how misleading those can be - seems at first glance to suggest nothing more than "Beckett's turn to make Castle jealous".
 
And next week's trailer - yeah I know how misleading those can be - seems at first glance to suggest nothing more than "Beckett's turn to make Castle jealous".

The difference being that
Michael Trucco's character is signed up for the remaining four episodes of the season, and might return next season.

By the way, the thread title has the episode title wrong. It's "The Late Shaft." (As in being given the shaft, which is kind of a clue to the murderer and motive.)
 
I just bet the July release date they mentioned for the paperback of Heat Wave is the real release date. I wonder if there's any chance they'd actually make a movie out of it. It'd be a bit redundant, but it'd score points for commitment to the metafiction.


Yep, I checked on the amazon. That's the real pub date for the paperback.
 
Hm, so Conan was the bad guy and he wanted to kill Leno? No wait, Eubanks killed Leno. Or was it Letterman who got killed? I'm confused. ;)
 
Was it just me or did the M.E. come up with those complicated toxicology reports amazingly fast, even by tv standards? The way they staged it, it's like she walks out of the room for a few minutes, then comes back with the data.

Or did I miss something?
 
Hm, so Conan was the bad guy and he wanted to kill Leno? No wait, Eubanks killed Leno. Or was it Letterman who got killed? I'm confused. ;)

Well the victim was more like Carson with a Conan buyout. The sidekick was definitely McMahon over Richter. The replacement host was like a Fallon version of Conan. :p
 
Hm, so Conan was the bad guy and he wanted to kill Leno? No wait, Eubanks killed Leno. Or was it Letterman who got killed? I'm confused. ;)

Like Aragorn said, it was more of a Carson/McMahon thing.


Was it just me or did the M.E. come up with those complicated toxicology reports amazingly fast, even by tv standards? The way they staged it, it's like she walks out of the room for a few minutes, then comes back with the data.

Or did I miss something?

I had the same impression, but I figured maybe she'd started the tox workup a few hours before the scene started and was just going off to get the results. Still, the staging was odd.
 
And next week's trailer - yeah I know how misleading those can be - seems at first glance to suggest nothing more than "Beckett's turn to make Castle jealous".

The difference being that
Michael Trucco's character is signed up for the remaining four episodes of the season, and might return next season.
True that, but then I was unaware of that when we saw the trailer last night, hence why I drew the parallel I did.



Was it just me or did the M.E. come up with those complicated toxicology reports amazingly fast, even by tv standards? The way they staged it, it's like she walks out of the room for a few minutes, then comes back with the data.

Or did I miss something?

I had the same impression, but I figured maybe she'd started the tox workup a few hours before the scene started and was just going off to get the results. Still, the staging was odd.

Ditto. The pace seemed awfully quick, given what usually transpires. But I can buy what you you've posited, Christopher.
 
I gave it an average, but average for Castle is still better than any other police procedural. I just didn't get into this episode that much, and like others have said, that 30 second toxicology test made no sense.

I love Fred Willard, and they really should have had Martin Mull as the host for the whole Fernwood 2-Nite angle.
 
I love Fred Willard, and they really should have had Martin Mull as the host for the whole Fernwood 2-Nite angle.

Better that than the gimmicky ABC-lineup crossover with the talk-show host being played by the host of the Dancing With the Stars show immediately preceding Castle, followed by Fillion appearing on a real late-night talk show half an hour after Castle.
 
"Gimmicky" is a good way to describe it. I had been searching for the right word to describe that "line up", and that just about does it. While this episode was by no means a bad one, it's the first time I've been truly disappointed in the series. That comes mostly from Castle's rather casual romps with the actress. It's not naivete so much as it was hopefulness that he wasn't the sort. And while the coming episode(s) may not be a tit-for-tat... I am sincerely hoping we aren't seeing the second coming of "Moonlighting". I loved the series but the "will they or won't they" playing around did become old after a time. True, once you have Castle and Beckett hook up the show could lose much of its "drama", but I'm still not a fan of these games the writers may be playing with the characters.
 
I thought this episode was below average. The show has been on a downward trend for the past three weeks in my opinion.

I think the use of the word "gimmicky" in this thread is spot on to describe the events in this week's episode.

I am also beginning to get tired of the sexual innuendo and will they won't they flirting going on between Castle and Beckett. I think it would be much more interesting if they remained friends. Shows tend to tank when the main stars begin to hook up.
 
I think the use of the word "gimmicky" in this thread is spot on to describe the events in this week's episode.

I didn't intend it to refer to the events of the episode, merely to the casting and the network's attempt to cross it over with the previous and subsequent shows that night. Taking the episode as a self-contained entity, ignoring the broader context, there's nothing particularly gimmicky about it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top