After reading through this thread, I'm mostly just shocked at the things people expect others to know!
Yeah, there's some interesting extremes here.
After reading through this thread, I'm mostly just shocked at the things people expect others to know!
Here we're taught that both North and South America are one single continent (As long with Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania) , however when seeing through a economical POV, North and South are "separate".
Here we're taught that both North and South America are one single continent (As long with Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania) , however when seeing through a economical POV, North and South are "separate".
Neither had I.Here we're taught that both North and South America are one single continent (As long with Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania) , however when seeing through a economical POV, North and South are "separate".
I honestly hadn't heard of the word Oceania (prior to your post) outside of the George Orwell novel "nineteen eight-four."
Here we're taught that both North and South America are one single continent (As long with Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania) , however when seeing through a economical POV, North and South are "separate".
I honestly hadn't heard of the word Oceania (prior to your post) outside of the George Orwell novel "nineteen eight-four."
"Nitpicker." Now there's a word I haven't heard in a long, long time... Some happy times, some sad times. Now gone.And, since we're in the nitpicker thread, I believe you mean to use the word "along" rather than the words "as long."
Here we're taught that both North and South America are one single continent (As long with Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania) , however when seeing through a economical POV, North and South are "separate".
And what of Mexico? It is on the North American continent yet has more in similar, economically and culturally with South American countries.
Here we're taught that both North and South America are one single continent (As long with Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania) , however when seeing through a economical POV, North and South are "separate".
I honestly hadn't heard of the word Oceania (prior to your post) outside of the George Orwell novel "nineteen eight-four." And, since we're in the nitpicker thread, I believe you mean to use the word "along" rather than the words "as long."
Weird, because we North Americans claim Mexico as part of OUR continent!Here we're taught that both North and South America are one single continent (As long with Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania) , however when seeing through a economical POV, North and South are "separate".
And what of Mexico? It is on the North American continent yet has more in similar, economically and culturally with South American countries.
When I was younger I was taught that it was actually North America (US, Canada etc), Latin America (Mexico etc) and South America (Brazil and etc) that consisted the American Continent, than at some point in little before High School they started saying that it have changed to only North and South America, being Mexico part of South.
And of course you're all forgetting the term Central America, which I have seen on several maps to include Mexico and everything down to Panama.
And of course you're all forgetting the term Central America, which I have seen on several maps to include Mexico and everything down to Panama.
I don't believe that's ever been taught as a separate continent. It's just another geographic grouping (similar to the phrase Latin America).
And of course you're all forgetting the term Central America, which I have seen on several maps to include Mexico and everything down to Panama.
I don't believe that's ever been taught as a separate continent. It's just another geographic grouping (similar to the phrase Latin America).
I think counting South America as part of North America (making one super continent of "America") is... odd.
Especialy considering South America is clearly it's own seperate, huge, landmass attahced to North America only by the tiny spindle of Mexico.
It makes about as much sense to me as considering Africa as being part of Eurasia.
I was always taught that Mexico is part of North America, and that Central America consists of the seven small countries between Mexico and Colombia: Guatemala, Belize (formerly British Honduras), El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama.I think counting South America as part of North America (making one super continent of “America”) is... odd.
Especialy considering South America is clearly it's own seperate, huge, landmass attahced to North America only by the tiny spindle of Mexico.
If North and South America, which are connected by a very skinny isthmus less than 50 miles wide at its narrowest point, are a single continent, then why is Africa considered a separate continent when it's joined to the Eurasian landmass by an equally narrow isthmus?Here we're taught that both North and South America are one single continent (As long with Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania) , however when seeing through a economical POV, North and South are “separate”.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.