• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Hey, is that ghost lady naked?

1) That's not a ghost. It's a really crappy photoshop. Either that, or this ghost's left shoulder is about 6 inches longer than her right. Look at it again, it's more apparent in the further out shot. Looks like they took a photo of some girl, pasted it into the photo, then sliced it in two and moved the right 1/4 (her left) on to the other side of the window frame.

2) The non-ghost woman is clearly wearing a V-neck something with really short sleaves. Looks like a dress.
 
1) That's not a ghost. It's a really crappy photoshop. Either that, or this ghost's left shoulder is about 6 inches longer than her right.
2) The non-ghost woman is clearly wearing a V-neck something with really short sleaves. Looks like a dress.

That's a necklace, not a V-neck.
 
No, it's a V-neck. You'll notice that there is more color in the area above the V than there is below. It's a white, or nearly white colored dress.

That, and the aforementioned sleeves. They stop about 2-3 inches below the shoulder.

Oh, and no ghost nips.
 
You can see the puffy but somewhat sharp shoulders of a period style dress. And what looks like wrinkling on the sleeves, unless it's a short sleeve and this part is just effects on the "photo".
 
I found this article from the Sun(where I also found the Argentina gnome story). A guy snapped a picture of a lady in a castle window. Supposedly there is no floor there to stand on. whether it is a hoax or not, I'm just trying to figure out if that girl is naked.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...d-castle-in-a-photo-said-to-show-a-ghost.html

She clearly isn't. You can see the "V" neck of he collar and the... "bulkiness" of the shoulders, the line under the boobs and many, many, other things. Were she naked, her body would seem to be made of poorly molded bread dough.
 
1) That's not a ghost. It's a really crappy photoshop. Either that, or this ghost's left shoulder is about 6 inches longer than her right. Look at it again, it's more apparent in the further out shot. Looks like they took a photo of some girl, pasted it into the photo, then sliced it in two and moved the right 1/4 (her left) on to the other side of the window frame.

2) The non-ghost woman is clearly wearing a V-neck something with really short sleaves. Looks like a dress.

Yeah her shoulder looks weird and too long, she also looks like a character cut out from a video game.
 
She is clothed. I can tell this because I am a product of the cable box adult channel scrambler generation, and am quite adept at knowing what is a booby and what is an elbow when viewing highly distorted images.
 
She's wearing a shift-and probably standing in front of a sign that says :

Located on this spot-The World's Largest Ball of Twine or something like that. What a lousy fake.
 
She is clothed. I can tell this because I am a product of the cable box adult channel scrambler generation, and am quite adept at knowing what is a booby and what is an elbow when viewing highly distorted images.


Me too. Ah I miss those days of hoping for a split second clear image during the scramble. LOL
 
One comment says it looks like Emma Watson. I'm not sure who she is. Is it her, from a movie or something?
 
One comment says it looks like Emma Watson. I'm not sure who she is. Is it her, from a movie or something?

Emma Watson is the young woman who plays Hemorrhoid in the Harry Potter movies.

The woman in the window looks nothing like Emma Watson who's slighter and has much lighter hair.
 
I actually thought it looked like Rachel Weisz when I saw it.

I agree - it's either fake or a reflection. I'm not going to go into the debate over whether ghost photos are real or not, but I've seen enough of the "who knows?" variety (as in ones declared "maybes" by people other than tabloid newspapers) that you don't tend to get images are clear as this unless it's a) a fake, b) some weird reflection, or c) something else involving a living, breathing person getting caught on camera.

We also only have the story's word for the fact there's no floor in that room.

Alex
 
What's silly are those so-called ghost photos that are clearly just a photographic image double-exposed to make it look "translucent." Logically, if there really were a translucent person-shaped entity walking around, you wouldn't just see the side of them facing you; you'd see their rear through their front, their skin through their clothes (and why would a ghost have clothes anyway?), and if they were anatomically correct, you'd see their innards too.
 
She is clothed. I can tell this because I am a product of the cable box adult channel scrambler generation, and am quite adept at knowing what is a booby and what is an elbow when viewing highly distorted images.
You too, huh? Good times. Good times.:eek:
 
She seems to be a painted illustration, actually - probably a figure clipped out of a book cover to be photoshopped in here. Oh, and the two posters arguing over the V-neck vs necklace thing are both right - there's a necklace with a neckline below it.
 
One comment says it looks like Emma Watson. I'm not sure who she is. Is it her, from a movie or something?

Emma Watson is the young woman who plays Hemorrhoid in the Harry Potter movies.

The woman in the window looks nothing like Emma Watson who's slighter and has much lighter hair.

Actually, Emma Watson was the first person I thought of when I saw the pic first time.
 
It's pretty easy. In this day and age where practically everyone has a camera in their pocket, there's no way something as "common" as a ghost -- especially a manifesting one that can be captured on film -- wouldn't be a regular occurrence.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top