^Oh, gosh, I hope not. 

^Was that a masturbation joke?
"Jim lightly brushed Spock's arm as they passed each other on the bridge. A knowing look was exchanged. Jim could tell that Spock was using every last bit of his fabled Vulcan-control to keep his Warp-Core from overloading..."
^Was that a masturbation joke?
I'm fairly certain he means he was literally trying to keep the warp core of his game-play ship from exploding.
I don't know, I think that could possibly just make things more confusing. I really think as long as the different timelines are left alone to do their own thing, it would be ok.I wonder if maybe the various timelines should be explicitly split up? Establish a Nero-style temporal incursion in a forthcoming novel to say “this is the point where it changes”. Or even have the characters later discover an incursion occurred shortly prior to Destiny, which seems to be the branching point.
Hell, if you want to be really clever you could make it an STO/TrekLit crossover with a ship from the STO timeline travelling back and creating the schism in the first place.
(I’m aware from Christopher’s Memory Beta link that there are discontinuities other than Destiny between STO and TrekLit, mostly the dates of a few events being slightly different and the occasional death/nondeath of a background character. IMO deal with the big events, and leave the rest to the reader’s imagination)
Risa in STO? I dunno... I doubt an all-ages game could come any closer to doing Risa justice than the TV shows could. If anything, Risa stories would work better in the novels, which are freer to touch on more adult subject matter.
Are the Trek novels set in the prime continuity in any way compelled to acknowledge the destruction of Romulus and disappearance of Spock in 2387? Would it be possible to simply ignore all that?
Are the Trek novels set in the prime continuity in any way compelled to acknowledge the destruction of Romulus and disappearance of Spock in 2387? Would it be possible to simply ignore all that?
^ They were wearing that much? Were they attending a formal function of some kind?
That might be a problem though, if we see all those non canon continuities as parallel realities (something I've been doing for a while now).The books are bound by canon, so everything in the movie that Spock said happened in the original timeline has to still happen in the original timeline.
The books are bound by canon, so everything in the movie that Spock said happened in the original timeline has to still happen in the original timeline.
That might be a problem though, if we see all those non canon continuities as parallel realities
There is. Nero and Spock came from one specific timeline/reality.That might be a problem though, if we see all those non canon continuities as parallel realities
If there are infinite parallel realities, there is no problem.
Unless of course, I missed a second Nero and a third Spock running around in ST IX...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.