^Who had no lines.
That stupid "synthehol" was taking Political Correctness TOO FAR! I mean, what's the point of something that tastes like alcohol but doesn't get you drunk?Roddenberry was aware that smoking was an unhealthy habit, and yes, he was very forward-thinking in choosing to present a future that had eradicated it . . . In TNG, he tried to do the same with alcohol by postulating that harmless "synthehol" had taken its place.
But Roddenberry dug in his heels and held to the idea that smoking would likely be eliminated by the time of Star Trek. Much like keeping Spock, having a asian navigator, and casting a black woman, he won the battle.
The idea that Roddenberry was a champion of racial inclusion battling a prejudiced network is part of the myth Roddenberry generated himself. Inside Star Trek reveals (and backs this up with actual network memos) that NBC was in fact strongly in favor of more diverse casting in their shows, and indeed one of the reasons they rejected most of the cast from "The Cage" is that it fell short of the diversity Roddenberry promised them. It's true that they objected to Spock, but otherwise they were on the same page as Roddenberry when it came to diversity, and in fact pushed him to do better in that regard. (I mean, the only hint of diversity in the "Cage" cast is that the blond navigator Tyler has a Hispanic first name -- which is never even used onscreen!)
That stupid "synthehol" was taking Political Correctness TOO FAR! I mean, what's the point of something that tastes like alcohol but doesn't get you drunk?
BINGO!!!Do they allow smoking on board ships in the Navy? Or specifically, inside the ships? Could be a point of realism for crewmen to be forbade smoking due to unnecessary strain on the life support system (wouldn't be much, but it would be a logical reason to ban smoking on board starships).
I was unaware that we have starships at the moment... unless you are posting from the International Space Station?I'm stuck on a starship that only uses recycled air, but I smoke.![]()
He wasn't serving on a starship.Of course, let's not forget St. John Talbot--a Federation ambassador no less!Big smoker.
I don't know what Navy policy is regarding smoking aboard surface ships, but as to submariners indulging the habit, check out this thread (starting with post #7):Do they allow smoking on board ships in the Navy? Or specifically, inside the ships?
I was unaware that we have starships at the moment... unless you are posting from the International Space Station?I'm stuck on a starship that only uses recycled air, but I smoke.![]()
![]()
He wasn't serving on a starship.[/QUOTE]Of course, let's not forget St. John Talbot--a Federation ambassador no less!Big smoker.
Morale. It made them look cool.This was one of the things that annoyed me about Battlestar Galactica. They're in a rag-tag fugitive fleet with limited food, limited water, limited ability to purify and recycle air and yet they think it's a good idea to turn over a significant part of hydroponics to keep growing tobacco?
Oh, you're on the Russian space station?Hell of a view from here.I was unaware that we have starships at the moment... unless you are posting from the International Space Station?I'm stuck on a starship that only uses recycled air, but I smoke.![]()
![]()
![]()
When did they get one of those?Pauln6 said:Plus they only have one toilet.
Morale. It made them look cool.This was one of the things that annoyed me about Battlestar Galactica. They're in a rag-tag fugitive fleet with limited food, limited water, limited ability to purify and recycle air and yet they think it's a good idea to turn over a significant part of hydroponics to keep growing tobacco?
According to The Making of Star Trek:. . . In TOS at least the ship did not have unlimited resources - they had protein synthesisors but much of their fresh food was grown in hydroponics (at least I'm aware that in TMP the ship had a hydroponics bay and some crew on the Rec Deck are in Luke Skywalker-style hydroponics outfits).
Of course, with Star Trek, nothing is ever set in stone.. . . the Enterprise has extensive food storage areas with preservation techniques that maintain food in "garden-fresh condition" over extended periods of time. Hydroponic food growing is not necessary and would use a disproportionate amount of manpower. There are, of course, hydroponics tanks aboard that are part of the botany laboratories. There is also a section where crew members can prepare individual dishes if they wish — an activity that comes under the heading of "recreation."
I assume you mean on the bridge, not on the entire ship!Plus they only have one toilet. Where would people go while on duty?
Do you really want an entire fleet going cold turkey?
Those people were near the breaking point already!![]()
Hell as far as that goes Earth of the future is more leinent than Ireland of the present, where any public indoor area is automatically no-smoking.
Morale. It made them look cool.This was one of the things that annoyed me about Battlestar Galactica. They're in a rag-tag fugitive fleet with limited food, limited water, limited ability to purify and recycle air and yet they think it's a good idea to turn over a significant part of hydroponics to keep growing tobacco?
Morale. It made them look cool.This was one of the things that annoyed me about Battlestar Galactica. They're in a rag-tag fugitive fleet with limited food, limited water, limited ability to purify and recycle air and yet they think it's a good idea to turn over a significant part of hydroponics to keep growing tobacco?
More infantile than cool, to my eyes.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.