number6
Vice Admiral
OK, fine. For the defenders, let me say this: It was a stumble that should have occurred in season ONE. By now, he should be a lot better at this. He's always telling T'Pol to be open-minded to how humans think and feel, yet he trashes the social customs and practices of other species.Which could easily have been done in a different manner that didn't further harm his already strained credibility as Captain.
There was nothing strained about it. He was the first Captain, the prototype. That was the point. This was a big stumble for him and he had to learn from it.
Honestly, what was SFC thinking when they named this petulant brat humanity's ambassador to the quadrant?
There's no written rule of law that dictates what season that should have happened. Season One for all intents and purposes was an introduction to the characters and to the new ship.. Season Two delved deeper into the characterizations and gave them some purpose. Season Three they were given a life or death mission, and Season Four we see the seeds of the founding of the Federation. I don't think ANIS was out of place in season two as it was certainly a character study of Archer, how far he's come and how far he needs to go. And we do see how much he learns in Season Two that gives him the confidence to be what we see in season four.
I don't need to defend what I like. I do think explaining the intent of the episode makes me appreciate it more.
I think the anger for this episode is so over the top as to be disturbingly laughable.