Does it mean Matt Smith has arrrived when
- Thread starter Marc
- Start date
I'm not sure if I want to record it now or not, but what was the category and $ amount?
Did they get it right?
Except on SNL, when Jeopardy contestants ARE pop culture.
"I'll take anal bum cover for $1000"... "No, that's AN ALBUM COVER"Yep they got it right and it was the oldest player & current champ who answered.
That would be the correct answer.
The character should only be called "The Doctor" within the fictional confines of the show and on geeky message forums. In the real world, he should be referred to as "Doctor Who."
Just saying "Dr. Who" could be considered answering in the form of a question 
"Who is Dr. Who" is just redundant.
"Who is Dr. Who" is just redundant.
Just saying "Dr. Who" could be considered answering in the form of a question
"Who is Dr. Who" is just redundant.
I wonder if they would of taken "who is the Doctor?" - especially as the the character has been creditted in as The Doctor since the late 70s iirc
IS THIS A RERUN -$800
MATT SMITH
IS THE LATEST ACTOR
TO BE THIS
SCI-FI "DR."
PREVIOUSLY PLAYED
BY PETER DAVISON
AND TOM BAKER
"Who is Doctor Who?"
(p.s. i typed this on my wii)
MATT SMITH
IS THE LATEST ACTOR
TO BE THIS
SCI-FI "DR."
PREVIOUSLY PLAYED
BY PETER DAVISON
AND TOM BAKER
"Who is Doctor Who?"
(p.s. i typed this on my wii)
Only in this day and age could ON be the most important word in that sentence. As opposed to with.
I wonder the same thing. If I were them, I would say both answers would be acceptable.Just saying "Dr. Who" could be considered answering in the form of a question
"Who is Dr. Who" is just redundant.
I wonder if they would of taken "who is the Doctor?" - especially as the the character has been creditted in as The Doctor since the late 70s iirc
Still, this is pretty cool. Any sign of a YouTube video yet?
Only in this day and age could ON be the most important word in that sentence. As opposed to with.
Hey hey, cut him some slack. For all we know, he jammed his Wii into a typewriter.
I bet a lot of people who don't watch the show would be able to figure it out from the "Sci-Fi Dr.(Doctor)" clue.
Not trying to rain on the parade, but has anyone else noticed the sharp decline of both the quality of questions and the quality of contestants on Jeopardy? The questions just seem to be SO much simpler than they used to be, questions about British sci-fi shows notwithstanding...
At one point when I was watching recently, all three contestants were in negative territory late in the first round! That never seemed to happen before...and they do seem to be hitting more pop culture/entertainment categories as opposed to the more academic stuff the show used to cover...or is it just me?
(Edited for the irony of me complaining about the decline in intelligence on the show...then promply misspelling the name of the show in the post...)
At one point when I was watching recently, all three contestants were in negative territory late in the first round! That never seemed to happen before...and they do seem to be hitting more pop culture/entertainment categories as opposed to the more academic stuff the show used to cover...or is it just me?
(Edited for the irony of me complaining about the decline in intelligence on the show...then promply misspelling the name of the show in the post...)
Similar threads
