• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Back To The Future: 2015?

J

Jetfire

Guest
Should Back To The Future be remade for a 2015 release? If it is I wasn't aware. I know BTTF is a classic however if done right it could be even more epic...if done right and not starring Will Smith's son. :guffaw:

Thoughts?

[edit] http://www.fusedfilm.com/2009/04/back-to-the-future-re-make-on-the-way/

Found that article...??? [Edit] According to Gaith it is a joke. The article has nothing to do with starting the thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hope not. The original films still hold up quite well. And I don't see nostalgia for the 80s supporting a film in the same way that nostalgia for the 50s did.
 
it could work, but it could also suck major balls.

i'd rather they just did a 30th anniversary re-release in cinemas so i could see it in cinemas.
 
I'd always wanted a 4th movie taking place in 2015, but that's never going to happen with MJF. :(

I'm not so certain of that.

With the tech they'll futher develop over the next 5 years and the material they have to work from, they really could make an off-the-walls followup.

I wouldn't expect Fox to be the main character, but since it would obviously be a digital-1985-Fox that would work out.

---

Now the nonsense in the first post is just awful. Fortunately it's all bullshit.
 
I would not wanna live in THAT 2015....that was more materialistic than the 80's. :p

Plus I am NOT wearing double neckties.
 
I'd like to see more of a sequel than a remake as well.

Plus, 2015 is the year in the future that Doc Brown took Marty and Jennifer to at the beginning of BTTF2. Seems like a good point to maybe just pick up Marty Jr. and send him back in time 30 years, where Jennifer mistakes him for Marty Sr. or something.
 
I always thought that 2015 as shown in BTTF 2 is intentionally over-the-top and an obvious joke that Marty was meant to fix. Meaning, the BTTF-verse's 'new' 2015 won't be that ass-ugly, it won't look like somebody threw up My Little Pony.
 
^
I started the thread before seeing the article...chill out.

I will take it out.
 
Well, to answer the question, no, BttF shouldn't be remade. The differences between 2015 and 1985 are nowhere near as big or interesting as those between 1985 and 1955, which was a key factor in making the first two movies so excellent.

That said, I would like to see a "serious" take on the concept. It'd have nothing to do with the trilogy; it'd just be about a modern college-age kid irretrievably warped back to the 1950s. What would s/he do? How would he live? What, if anything, would he try to change?

I also wouldn't mind seeing a movie about Doc between 1955 and 1985, but apart from that, the franchise should be left alone, IMO. :)
 
The differences between 2015 and 1985 are nowhere near as big or interesting as those between 1985 and 1955, which was a key factor in making the first two movies so excellent.

I can only assume you're under this impression because you were alive in 1985.
 
Nope. ;)

Well... never mind, I was, for part of it. I couldn't see much, though, if you follow me...

But the key 1955-'85 difference is the cultural tumultuousness of the sixties and seventies, which were far more impactful than anything that happened in the nineties or the aughts. We've even started to forget about 9/11, in everyday life at least (or else 2012 would never have been greenlit), but no one in the 80s could ever forget about Vietnam, or the Cold War.

In the 80s, people were going to Star Trek and 007 movies, watching TV, starting to use cell phones and computers and were dealing with hostile Middle Eastern governments and terrorists. In 2015... we'll likely still be doing all of that.
 
It's just as brilliant an idea as remaking Space: 1999 in 1999 or 2001: A Space Odyssey in 2001 (They'd probably had to have to called it 2001: They Don't Go To Jupiter And Hal Doesn't Go Nuts, It's All Rather Uneventful.)
 
I think the Back to the Future movies stand on their own, and a sequel shouldn't be made. Frankly, I wish someone would adapt Poul Anderson's Time Patrol stories. -- RR
 
It's not needed, and I don't think the concept would work as well with 1985.

This, of course, won't stop someone from trying. The problem is the original trilogy was the Michael J Fox and Christopher Lloyd show. They were the ones that made the films work (if you don't believe me, try to imagine the films with Eric Stoltz as Marty, as was originally planned). Now, i could see the potential of doing a fourth film with Fox and Lloyd, except that as we know Fox has had major health challenges and while he still works as an actor (and good on him), I can't imagine him being able to do another turn as Marty McFly. So they'd have to introduce a new pair of actors, or maybe pair Lloyd with someone else -- very risky.

All that said, it has been 25 years since the first film (incredible to imagine), and given Hollywood's timeline for remakes, it's actually overdue for a do-over. I just don't know if people will take to a time-travelling Smart Car the same way they latched onto the Delorean... ;)

It's just as brilliant an idea as remaking Space: 1999 in 1999 or 2001: A Space Odyssey in 2001 (They'd probably had to have to called it 2001: They Don't Go To Jupiter And Hal Doesn't Go Nuts, It's All Rather Uneventful.)

LOL (sad but true). There actually was some talk of redoing Space: 1999 about 10 years ago, too. Fortunately sanity prevailed, and we got the Message from Moonbase Alpha mini-episode that year instead. I think 2001: A Space Odyssey falls into an "untouchable" category. There are a few films that Hollywood studios, though they may be rumoured to be thinking about it, ultimately shy away from remaking. There's a reason the Casablanca remake has never happened. Nor have they attempted a remake of Gone with the Wind (a sequel, yes, but that doesn't count). Or Citizen Kane. Nor has anyone even considered remaking any film that had Chaplin's name on the credits (even though the Great Dictator would be easy to update for today, and The Immigrant would have made a great Robin Williams vehicle 20 years ago). The Wizard of Oz technically falls into this category too, because while the original book has been readapted several times, the original 1939 musical has never been remade (The Wiz doesn't count as it was a new score). No one will ever attempt to redo The Godfather. And while it will continue to influence the look of movies forever, I don't see any likelihood of someone attempting a redo of Fritz Lang's Metropolis anytime soon except maybe as a CGI experiment in 3-D.

2001 is one of these untouchables, and the fact the sequel 2010 didn't do very well at the box office has probably made the studios shy away from tackling the original again - or doing any of the other books in the series.

Alex
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top