I suspect the culture of the 24th century is mostly porn.
On Star Trek, they don't really talk about current Earth culture. (such as music, entertainment, art, etc.) They only reference culture from before the 21st century.
If they tried to show future civilian culture, it could very well look silly a mere 5 years later. Remember this is a franchise created by people in the 20th/early 21st century, and for audiences of that time.
Two reasons:
1. The Beastie Boys totally rock
3. The "Vulcancore" genre which dominated the 21st-23rd centuries doesn't have the pizazz.
That game with the Zakdorn from "Peak Performance" still looks pretty sweet, though.
If they tried to show future civilian culture, it could very well look silly a mere 5 years later. Remember this is a franchise created by people in the 20th/early 21st century, and for audiences of that time.
^Well every Trek incarnation up to Abram's Trek XI had plenty of stilted, formal dialogue in it which is rarely the way real people speak. (unless you are a Vulcan)
/\"Is this the kind of wife you want, then? Not someone to help you — not a wife to cook, and sew, and cry, and need. This kind — selfish, vain, useless. Is this what you really want? All right then, here it is."
^ Riker said "we don't enslave animals anymore", maybe that horse was mechanical?
If animals aren't enslaved anymore, than what the hell was Spot?
/\"Is this the kind of wife you want, then? Not someone to help you — not a wife to cook, and sew, and cry, and need. This kind — selfish, vain, useless. Is this what you really want? All right then, here it is."
I find it a little hard to believe that people will be talking like this in the 23rd century.
If animals aren't enslaved anymore, than what the hell was Spot?
I would imagine Spot, or Archer's beagles, etc. would have been considered "companion animals" and not "slaves." While extremist animal defense groups* (both in the future and today) may not make a distinction between a beloved animal considered as a family member with no labor or quid pro quo expected, clearly the rest of the galaxy does.
* Please do not take this as an opening for an anti-animal experimentation rant. I am extremely anti-vivisection, animal experimentation, you name it, and as a psychology major (where animal experiments are done) actively campaigned against it. I just don't think that most people, myself included, feel that including a dog or cat in the family is the moral equivalent of pre-civil war American slavery, and that attempts to do so diminish both the horror institution of slavery (and modern human trafficking) and the legitimate positions of those non-extremists who devote themselves to protecting the rights of animals.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.