• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Lawyers are coming...!

USS KG5

Vice Admiral
Admiral
Hi All,

I what is certain to become a protracted campaign over the next few years, a law firm is now sending letters to 15,000 users in the UK it has supposedly identified as sharing illegal movies and games. Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8381097.stm

The question is, will this see the end, gradually of "casual" file sharing? Ultimately the industries will never care about a techie hardcore who continue to share with masked IP addresses, but they do care about kiddies in their bedrooms downloading the latest Leona Lewis single instead of buying it.

Tied-in with the new "three strikes" system the government is certain to introduce, will this be the end of unlimited "free" music, films and games albeit obtained on a morally dubious and technially illegal basis?

More crucially, will this lead to the end of the "free" Internet? While there are good arguments for surveillance (after all, who really thought Townsend was writing a book) it also has a big brother element to it that frankly turns my stomach.

Personally, I was a little shaken by this sudden campaign. I have never downloaded whole movies (porn or otherwise) and never a game, and I buy a lot of music DVDs and Games legally all the time, but how many people will be hit if this campaign continues?

A recent campaign on TV for PC World caught my eye, a rather annoying couple talk about downloading movies all the time! Surely the implication is they are doing this illegally, not legally? Additionally despite the current poor market share of legal downloads we are constantly sold faster and faster connections, for legal downloading only?

There needs to be a frank and fair exchange between all parties IMHO. Downloading is morally wrong, legal arguments and technicalities aside. This does not however justify threatening letter from lawyers, draconian actions by government and well, downright oppression to put it mildly.

I know a lot of posters here both will agree and disagree with me, but the "battle" over downloading looks to be ending, and with a firm victory for the establishment. I think the biggest casualty of this will be the freedom of the Internet.
 
Ultimately, I think the model they need to switch to is generating revenue directly from ISPs, and indirectly from consumers. I wouldn't mind paying an extra $100 a month for my Internet access if it meant I can download any nonsense I wanted; it'd be a lot more convenient.
 
AFAIK, only uploading is legally wrong. So, how goes one about proving that said person uploaded, instead of downloaded? Simple answer: You can but it is a long and costly thing to, one thing that lawyers have nether the patience nor the time to.
In fact, they're trying to scare you into paying them a quote unquote modest fee and be done with it. It's an all-new business model. And one which I cannot endorse.

If the major labels had been quick enough to get a good digital distributing infrastructure in place they would not have to fight tooth and nails ie. sue random people.
 
Actually I think in the UK we don't even have a "fair use" clause in our copyright law, so technically it is illegal to even copy music onto your ipod, which is utterly ludicrous.

Sadly when receiving these letters you only have four options: -

1. Pay up - therefore admitting guilt and a bad idea.
2. Ignore it, therefore risking summary judgement against you, an EXTREMELY bad idea.
3. Write a reply yourself, denying everything and it might well go away.
4. Get your solicitor to write them a letter which will cost you but definitely make it go away.

Sadly there are no GOOD options, and it seems in these cases that the most extreme method has been tried first, something I could never approve of.

If it must be this way for gods sake lets get the "three strikes" law passed and kill file-sharing softly, not this, anything but this.

People in the UK have little enough faith in the law as it is trust me!
 
Part of the problem is the lower standard of proof required in civil cases -which this is essentially about.

It is just so misguided and counter-productive it just makes me feel rather shocked.
 
Anybody here heard about the ACTA Treaty? It's to be concluded in 2010...

You should seriously read about it, Wikipedia itself has some interesting information regarding the treaty. This is not a good treaty and I think more people need to know about it.
 
Yes, I've been keeping an eye on ACTA news via michaelgeist.ca.

A major concern, to put it mildly.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top