A simple question that really bugged him when he watched the part when the Narada starts drilling Earth.
"Why have they no ground based anti-air/space defences? One little cannon and BOOM! evil drill is gone..."
So what would you say to him by way of answer?
ST2009 was, by admission of JJ, pure glitz aimed to attract large box office numbers and dollars, without substance or thought behind it. If you are looking for a good story or things to actually make sense, look elsewhere.
I would say "Deerrrr.... they just sent a fleet of starships with the best weapons they had at their disposal and didn't make a dent. It'd be a waste of time, when everybody should be evacuating, including those who would be shooting those cannons.
.
The scarcity of Earth's defences is an utter joke, and an increasingly tiresome and lazy plot device by movie makers.
Yes, Nero had the Earth's defence codes, but are we to beleive that earth had no weapons, ships or aircraft capable of functioning independently? If Earths weapons were all disabled by a single network, then by extension the Enterprise's weapons should also have been disabled, (otherwise the defence codes are useless).
In 'reality', Earth's skies would have been filled with fighters and Starships. It would be like driving into Washington DC with a bulldozer and trying to demolish the Pentagon- and meeting no resistance!
ST2009 was, by admission of JJ, pure glitz aimed to attract large box office numbers and dollars, without substance or thought behind it. If you are looking for a good story or things to actually make sense, look elsewhere.
"Why have they no ground based anti-air/space defences? One little cannon and BOOM! evil drill is gone..."
So what would you say to him by way of answer?
In 'reality', Earth's skies would have been filled with fighters and Starships. It would be like driving into Washington DC with a bulldozer and trying to demolish the Pentagon- and meeting no resistance!
Lol, no need to get so defensive.ST2009 was, by admission of JJ, pure glitz aimed to attract large box office numbers and dollars, without substance or thought behind it. If you are looking for a good story or things to actually make sense, look elsewhere.
So besides your rant fest over something you obviously didn't like, you don't have an answer?
In 'reality', Earth's skies would have been filled with fighters and Starships. It would be like driving into Washington DC with a bulldozer and trying to demolish the Pentagon- and meeting no resistance!
Well, Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, had a wacky old man deliberately drive his car into the lobby of the building a few years ago.
Where were the fighter jets when a plane crashed into the World Trade Center? And again, when a second one did the same?
Have you seen a Star Trek movie?In 'reality', Earth's skies would have been filled with fighters and Starships. It would be like driving into Washington DC with a bulldozer and trying to demolish the Pentagon- and meeting no resistance!
Well, Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, had a wacky old man deliberately drive his car into the lobby of the building a few years ago.
Where were the fighter jets when a plane crashed into the World Trade Center? And again, when a second one did the same?
I would say there's a difference between a brief, unforseen (and unpreventable) collision, and a sustained attack by a hostile alien vessel that had struck previously.
It just seems to me that -peacetime or not- the Earth should be as well defended with 23rd Century weapons as present day Britain or America are defended by 21st Century weapons. Starfleet is well aware of the threats posed by other races in the galaxy: there's no way they'd leave Earth so poorly defended.
Another point is, Earth would know of the destruction of Vulcan, and starfleet would logically have taken extra steps to bolster Earth security in its wake. For a start, they would have called the fleet home.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.