Just Kate, your and Thor Damar's story had such amazing scope for the word limit and conveyed a great deal of what I like to call "painting around the edges". There was much more implied than was said, and I loved that. I found the interview with Spock dead on to Spock's voice and the illusion that there were all these different documents and interviews out there really compelling.
Thanks so much - that's exactly what we were hoping for, really, and we are talking about doing more along those lines. It was
Thor's idea entirely - it's one of the things that lured me into this little project, although that it was Thor doing the asking didn't hurt any either - but it immediately made me think of one of my favorite mystery books,
The Documents in the Case by Dorothy Sayers and Robert Eustace. It isn't one of Sayers' most popular books - I expect because there's no Lord Peter Wimsey in it - but I've always loved it, so when Thor proposed something similar...well, I just fell for it.
Hmmm, I've heard of Googledocs - never used it, though, and I never thought of using it for this. I shall ponder this further. Thanks,
Gibraltar.
And thanks for the kind words,
Rob.
Which does bring up something else -
PS and
Nerys as well as
Count Zero and
_r_ tried (or so it seems to me) for a seamless construction where you couldn't tell, stylistically, who had written what. I couldn't, anyway, although in the case of PS and Nerys I could make a reasonable guess at some parts based on the themes and characters. Thor and I deliberately decided not to do that - which turned out to be a good thing since he is so good at speechwriting, whereas I most certainly am not (sounding like the precise and logical Spock comes a lot more naturally to me than rousing oration, alas

), and of course there are few things that feel more natural to me than a journalism-style interview.
But how did the rest of you divvy up the writing?