@DiaboiKate:
I have never once stated that anyone has a closed mind. You're inferring that I did. I would never claim to be so great that my perceptions are better than anyone in this existence or that anyone's are better than any other because they aren't.
Still I cannot help but argue that a Dukat and Kira relationship would have been far more interesting than the predictable and safe Kria & Odo.
So, saying that I (or we, since there are several of us involved in this debate) ought to "open our minds" differs from implying that you think our minds are closed? Really? How exactly?
As for Kira/Odo, I don't care much one way or another. Meh. There's nothing wrong with romance per se, but I really only care about it as it assists the plot or tells us things about the characters, so it's not a big thing for me when I watch Trek. But I agree with
DevilEyes that although it might have been predictable, I fail to understand what's so "safe" about it. Besides, who says she has to end up with either one? Who's to say what happens in the future?
I agree that the Kira/Dukat relationship is
very interesting. The thing is, as others have pointed out, it's interesting because it doesn't fit into easy categories. It's interesting
exactly as it was - fantastically convoluted and antagonistic and filled with animosity and conflict. Why - why - take that wonderful creation and turn it into anything as...as...as stereotypical as a romance? I don't get it at all.
There aren't that many really interesting, really bad guys out there. Most of them are pure stereotypes - cardboard cutout figures of guys in black hats twirling their mustaches. Dukat most definitely was not. In contrast, there are countless examples - literally countless - in TV and movies and books and plays of bad guys who turn out not to be so bad and who are saved by the love of a good woman.
So why does yet another one strike you as being so dang "interesting"? What's so interesting about
that?
I think that you want to see a romance where there is none because that would validate your dearly held belief that underneath it all, Dukat is a great guy. Why you want that since Dukat is such a wonderful character as a non-great guy, as the bad man he really is, I don't understand, but it's clear that is what you want.
Edit:
DevilEyes said:
I'm not sure that those aren't really two different sets of scenes. One might say that he's being a manipulative bastard in many or most of those "romantic" scenes.
Man, are you right - very good point. Being manipulative was, now that I think about it, Dukat's way of being "romantic." Brrrrrr....