• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Judge allows UK couple to keep "Q" as their child's legal name

jefferiestubes8

Commodore
Commodore
Judges have overturned a legal ban on science-fiction fans naming their son "Q" after their favourite Star Trek character.

The parents, from Jamtland, Sweden, appealed to the Swedish Supreme Court

Appeal judges have now lifted the ban saying there was no proof the boy - now nearly one year old - would suffer because of the name.

Dad Rickard Rehnberg said: "He's been called Q almost since day one. He listens to the name and can actually say his own name.
October 5 2009

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?art_id=iol1254705418983A551&click_id=29&set_id=1

A legal one letter name!
 
I'm not sure what to think of that one...

I suppose it's not indentifiable as a strictly Trek name, so on that front less likely to have the piss taken, but there are probably a lot of other ways this will go horribly wrong.
 
Though he was named after the Trek character, I wonder how many people will mistakenly assume he was named after Q from James Bond.
 
Q! How Qt. :)

I think the idea that someone once successfully argued in front of a judge that one letter names is "harmful" to the development of the child humorously absurd, btw.
 
Can I just point out that Sweden is not, and never has been part of the UK :p

The article says London at the start becauise they probably ripped it off a London news agency, but this has nothing to do with the UK.
 
I know a couple who's child's name is Quentin, but they've always called him Q.
Aside from ending up a serial killer, he's really quite normal.

No, really, he's fine.

I still kick myself for not giving my son the middle name Tiberius. Seriously. How cool would that have been?
 
I dunno, a lot of people might think he was named after the arguably the worst of the Julio-Claudian emperors. It's a pretty weird name regardless.
 
You never know, it could allow the kid to fill the rest of his first name to whatever he wants.
 
I don't think this can be in the UK, since, unless I'm very much mistaken, no restrictions have ever been placed here on what you can name a child.
 
If people think such names are "cute", they should change their own names -not force their kids into a future of playground beatdowns. :confused:
 
As someone with a name that, while normal, lead to a lot of unpleasantness as a kid... I'd like to smack these parents with the broad side of a barn.

People -- all people, whether celebrity or average folk -- need to stop naming their kids whacked out things for whatever naive and idiotic reasons they do such.

Children are inherently cruel. I don't know why. I just know they are. Everyone knows this -- except, perhaps, the people who name their kids Apple, or Kal'el, or Q...

When you give those inherently cruel children, now with mob mentality, an easy target like an eccentric name? My god, you might as well give them loaded hand-guns! How can any parent be that naive, that stupid, that ignorant, as to knowingly put their child through what's sure to be a torturous childhood?

Can you imagine how bad it's going to be for all the kids out there with insane names? I'm sure Gwyneth Paltrow's kid Apple won't have to face too much scorn, being born and bread into the Hollywood community. Eccentricity is applauded there. But for your average individual?

I pity these poor kids, I scorn and question the credentials of these idiotic judges, and I want to sterilize and commit the naive and ignorant parents.

/\ Didn't you ever hear A Boy Named Sue? An embarrassing name could be a positive advantage!

Please. Go back in time, become a child, and live with a name like that, and THEN repeat your assertion that it could be a positive advantage. I've been there. I've done that. I can speak from experience. My name may be fairly run of the mill, but an inoppertune kids tv show made it hell to have, so I know full well what kids with whacked-out names will endure. It's never an advantage.

Want to give your kid an advantage? Name them a common name. John, Bill, Sarah, Jennifer, whatever! Let them live in peace!
 
Everybody here had the same thought I did. I hope little "Q" is about 6'0" and 180 lbs when he goes to junior high and 6'5", 260 lbs of pure muscle and has attained his black belt when he hits high school. Otherwise Q's gonna be F'd.
 
I bet that child will grow up to be devious and amoral and unreliable and irresponsible and... and definitely not to be trusted.
 
As someone with a name that, while normal, lead to a lot of unpleasantness as a kid... I'd like to smack these parents with the broad side of a barn.

People -- all people, whether celebrity or average folk -- need to stop naming their kids whacked out things for whatever naive and idiotic reasons they do such.

Well said, Fuzzybottom, well said.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top