If we were to apply the standards of evidence necessary to convict someone of murder, as Finnegan suggests, then we would have to note that every one of the persuasively detailed accounts of saucer landings, etc. that he reports are nothing more than hearsay: stories that he has read or heard that were repeated as "reliable."
UFO 'filmed for 40 minutes' by Chinese scientists during eclipse
- Thread starter Bad Bishop
- Start date
But that's not really true. I took pains to reference reports from Police officers and Military personel--as well as trained commercial pilots with simultaneous radar and ground-based confirmation of the sightings. There are many, many similar cases the world over. In court, is the testimony of the police considered "hearsay"? I don't believe that it is--or the conviction rate for a whole host of offences would be practically nil. This is not the case, though, is it?
All Seeing Eye
Admiral
A fake--and not even a very good one.
Oh bollocks! It was an excellent fake. The splash looked a little off, but this was entertaining.
All Seeing Eye
Admiral
.
.
.
LINK
.
.
.
I've reposted the video because the person on youtube deleted the video I originally posted for some reason so i've posted a link to the same video but which was put on youtube by another user.
Last edited:
Apparently not. I thought exposing your (continuing) argumentative nature and your contradictory and conflicting Logic of "Convenience" was child's play.
Looking at the footage in the clip, I'd say its CGI on a video'd sky background. There's nothing else in the frame they showed but blue sky. If it was filmed for 40 minutes solid, and by different cameras, that would be something different.
It was seen by different people, like the disc over Chicago airport...that thing was seen by many. I remain open-minded on the subject, but the video in this Chinese story is not very compelling.
It was seen by different people, like the disc over Chicago airport...that thing was seen by many. I remain open-minded on the subject, but the video in this Chinese story is not very compelling.
Apparently not. I thought exposing your (continuing) argumentative nature and your contradictory and conflicting Logic of "Convenience" was child's play.
You're a legend in your own mind.
It doesn't take much to impress people around here, does it?
Apparently not. I thought exposing your (continuing) argumentative nature and your contradictory and conflicting Logic of "Convenience" was child's play.
You're a legend in your own mind.
Oh! OW!! *ZINGER*!! I am SO undone! How can I EVER post again?
(What are you, man? Like 14 years old? Grow up!)
Indeed you do. Now, would you care to pick a side and try to get BACK on topic? Or, for that matter, you could continue arguing whichever side suits your contrary mood of the moment. At least make an effort though to stumble your way back to the subject at hand. If nothing else, it would make you seem less of of a whiny little girl.