Should as in they ought to, or will? (Any inside scoop?)
Star Trek XII Release Date & Box Office Discussion Thread
- Thread starter MvRojo
- Start date
Should as in they ought to, or will? (Any inside scoop?)
No, just thinking that they should soon, and really they should have done it earlier this summer.
I wish I could get inside scoop, but the only person I know at Paramount works for a production company that just has their offices there.
May 13.
With the kind of competition that month in the same or similar genre? Not sure about that.
Trek wouldn't get IMAX in that case; at least not the same weekend as its regular release.
It was the lowest grossing domestically ($336 million), but the most successful internationally ($890 million worldwide).
It actually did break records. It set the opening weekend record of $151 million over the 3-day weekend.
And judging by its performance in IMAX, it would probably be best to have the release coincide.
Yup, and I think that that definitely hurt HP6 .
WB should move Green Lantern to May 20th if they're smart. Marvel is only moving Thor to June so as not to compete with another one of their characters.
This as in Transformers or Trek?
This as in Transformers or Trek?
Trek. It doesn't seem like they are rushing the movie (which is good), and might explain why they haven't pegged a release date yet or even said it's being released in 2011.
Count on it. No way it'll be ready in a year and a half. Keep dreamin', people.
This as in Transformers or Trek?
Trek. It doesn't seem like they are rushing the movie (which is good), and might explain why they haven't pegged a release date yet or even said it's being released in 2011.
That'd be a shame, speaking on a strictly selfish level. But I suppose dreck like Transformers II is easier to rush to production.
Edited to ask--if the producer, director, actors, sets, fx company are all set to go at pretty much a moment's notice, why would it be so difficult to shoot the movie in that time, even within a year?
Spider-Man will be.
Last edited:
That'd be a shame, speaking on a strictly selfish level. But I suppose dreck like Transformers II is easier to rush to production.
Edited to ask--if the producer, director, actors, sets, fx company are all set to go at pretty much a moment's notice, why would it be so difficult to shoot the movie in that time, even within a year?
Spider-Man will be.
They aren't all ready at a moment's notice. They all need to be scheduled in, and several key actors are presently in TV series and appearing in other upcoming movies.
You can use a lot of the old sets, but you will need new ones - you can't build them until you have a script - something I actually hope they take their time with.
Plus, they will need plenty of time in post, if the FX are to be up to XI's high standards. Moreover, Abrams did a lot of recutting and refininf in post, which was all to XI's betterment.
I'd rather they not rush, frankly.
Well nobody wants a rush-job, I agree... grumble.
That'd be a shame, speaking on a strictly selfish level. But I suppose dreck like Transformers II is easier to rush to production.
Edited to ask--if the producer, director, actors, sets, fx company are all set to go at pretty much a moment's notice, why would it be so difficult to shoot the movie in that time, even within a year?
Spider-Man will be.
Because they still haven't started writing yet. Spider-man 4 should be done soon since they're already set filming to begin in January.
Well shit, 2012 it is, then...
Similar threads
