The Federation is full of bullshit. There are people around who are fully devoted to its ideals, sure, but there's always seemed to be just as many who pay lip service to its ideals while doing what they feel is necessary under the radar. Not just Section 31-type stuff, either -- normal starship captains, doctors, ensigns, enlisted, etc. -- even admirals, though they tend to be noisier about it. I won't argue that one side or the other is right because I see both sides. But not everyone in Starfleet is a "true believer."
That's part of my interpretation. I was discussing TNG with a friend the other night and we both hated their idealistic view of things. Not only does a flawed government seem more believable, it's also far more interesting.
The great thing about having a detailed outline is that you know exactly what you have to write next and that makes things very easy once you get going. And even though everything is nicely outlined it doesn't mean everything is necessarily written in stone.
I've done that and I agree with the time it takes... I still do it to an extend, though much like
hellsgate's flow chart idea it gets chopped up and mixed around as time progresses in the actual writing.
I think thats why I end up with so many notes - I said on my site when I started uploading Year One that there would likely be more notes than there would story as the overall and personal outlines, concepts, pieces of dialoge and even sketches and reference materials (mostly made so I don't write things like names/dates etc differently) took up a hel of a lot of time. It seems pointless to some, though it helped me a great deal.
Now I have the outline scribbled in a folder and track alterations on my laptop as I'm editing/re-writing.
Style-wise, I like to write in "real life", and what I mean by that is, that I write dialogue with the same pacing and feel as if you were seeing someone speak in a real conversation.
I think thats one reason I was very cautious or hesitant to even contemplate putting my stuff online until I was nagged into it - I'll have conversations in my head to try and work out the most natural way to speak. When I decided to do Trek I took on board the dialogue styles (acting always seemed more stage than screen) and opted to disregard it for the type of conversations I'd have.
I tend to have a clear vision of what people look like, accents etc which helps... well, it helps me figure out what words sound good to the imaginary voice they have in my head. One being the easiest as he has my own accent
At the same time I don't take myself seriously whatsoever. I don't expect anyone to read or care about what I've done - which free's me a little to add little things that will amuse me, or write whole scenes where conversations have very little point. Just two people chatting and hopefully whoevers foolish enough to read getting to know the chracter before anything happens to them.