Watson's on 62??

The wicket must be as dead as the dodo. If he can make runs on it there isn't much chance of a result, even without the weather.
That wicket looks like the biggest featherbed of all time, bad bowling will get murdered out there - might have been an ideal wicket for Hughes to make some easy runs. Pity we have a team heirarchy incapable of seeing the all too obvious.
I am so irrationally mad at Hughes' axing. I mean I have never interviewed him, let alone know him personally, but I feel he is the victim of the worst selection decision probably since the days of Border. For god's sake who in the world can play Flintoff at his best? Anyone's gonna look outclassed facing that quality of bowling. This is a guy who scored over 400 runs in three tests against the Sth African attack, and was being touted as a left handed Bradman two weeks ago. He's been dudded.
I can only assume a clique dominates that team. Some are given every chance despite endless mediocrity/bad form/outright failure (Hussey, M. Clarke, Johnson, Watson), some get shafted without a second thought (Kreja, Hughes, McGain, MacGill, Casson).
I find it hard enough to get behind this current incarnation of the Aussie team - this sort of stuff makes it even harder.
Anyway, sorry, but I'm glad I got that out of my system
To today's play, and credit where it's due to Watson, his pulls and drives against some bad bowling were very easy on the eye last night.
England's attack looks to be in for a long day. Broad is out of his depth, Onions looks like he needs assistance to have any impact, Anderson struggles when it's not swinging, and Flintoff bowled poorly last night. Leaving out Harmison looks a huge mistake.
Ponting should take over from AB as our leading test runscorer. One more good home series and he'll easily have Tendulkar's all time record - maybe for a long time if the domination of 20/20 continues to crowd out real cricket from the schedule.