I would; I don't distinguish between attacking a country and providing safe haven and operating grounds for those who do. So, no, I do not and have never objected to the United States's war in Afghanistan -- though I add that I believe that the U.S. needs to develop a clearer sense of achievable objectives, a willingness to allow Afghanistan to have its own internal conflicts so long as they do not threaten the U.S. or our allies, or constitute genocide/chattel slavery-level human rights abuses, and a game plan to know how to leave when it becomes clear that al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations will simply no longer be able to use Afghanistan as a base of operations against the U.S. or its allies.Hmm...outta curiosity...would you be willing to extend that statement to ”unless that society has attacked foreign societies...and/or provided safe haven for those who do"?However, foreign societies do not have a right to interfere in their domestic politics unless that society has attacked foreign societies.
Also, out of curiosity, would you also accept that given what we know about safe havens for terrorists in Pakistan (both on its Eastern and Western borders), that the U.S., Europe and India have the right to root out these elements by force (even though they're choosing not to exercise that right for whatever reasons) ?