Hello. I've been racking my brain for a few hours now, trying to figure this out and I need some help.
I've recently purchased a HDMI capable computer monitor. I believe it's capable of running 900p, if I've understood everything correctly. Meanwhile, my 360 is working on my old TV through composite cables (the non-HD wires). It does not have a HDMI port nor am I able to use the component cables (HD wires) because I don't have anything that works in HD besides the new monitor.
Those who know what the hell I'm talking about, did I get that all right?
Now MadCatz came out with this highly expensive HDMI Converter Kit. Would it pay for me, who is unable to use the component cables, to get this? I'm already aware that if I could use the component cables, this converter would be pointless. Meanwhile, the damn thing would probably cost anywhere between $70-90.
The other option is to "trade in" (see also being robbed) my current XBox and shelling out whatever in order to get an HDMI capable box ALONG with the mandatory $50 for the HDMI cable. This doesn't sound cost effective at all, but I've read it being argued that it's the only way to guarantee the best video performance. I can't help but think that my monitor's 900p limitation kind of moots this point, no?
My dilema is really...is HDMI, or Hi-Def in general, worth all this headache? I just don't quite grasp exactly the whole thing and while searching through the internet, I was constantly stumbling upon articles and what-not that are made from people who DO understand and, really, it just caused me to confused more. I took a good half hour before I noticed the different uses for the terms "composite" and "component".
So, please, if you've been graced with the ability to firmly grasp all of this, give me your opinion. I'd really appreciate it.
I've recently purchased a HDMI capable computer monitor. I believe it's capable of running 900p, if I've understood everything correctly. Meanwhile, my 360 is working on my old TV through composite cables (the non-HD wires). It does not have a HDMI port nor am I able to use the component cables (HD wires) because I don't have anything that works in HD besides the new monitor.
Those who know what the hell I'm talking about, did I get that all right?

Now MadCatz came out with this highly expensive HDMI Converter Kit. Would it pay for me, who is unable to use the component cables, to get this? I'm already aware that if I could use the component cables, this converter would be pointless. Meanwhile, the damn thing would probably cost anywhere between $70-90.
The other option is to "trade in" (see also being robbed) my current XBox and shelling out whatever in order to get an HDMI capable box ALONG with the mandatory $50 for the HDMI cable. This doesn't sound cost effective at all, but I've read it being argued that it's the only way to guarantee the best video performance. I can't help but think that my monitor's 900p limitation kind of moots this point, no?
My dilema is really...is HDMI, or Hi-Def in general, worth all this headache? I just don't quite grasp exactly the whole thing and while searching through the internet, I was constantly stumbling upon articles and what-not that are made from people who DO understand and, really, it just caused me to confused more. I took a good half hour before I noticed the different uses for the terms "composite" and "component".
So, please, if you've been graced with the ability to firmly grasp all of this, give me your opinion. I'd really appreciate it.
