Is it really the solution to Americas health care problem?
I can assure you no doctor is getting ''rich'' unless there plastic or brain surgeons. (my mom's a M.D. and my family aint livin in the lap ''O'' luxury)As long as no one sees it s a get rich quick scheme (like your current system) it certainly is an improvement.
Is it really the solution to Americas health care problem?
Is it really the solution to Americas health care problem?
Is it really the solution to Americas health care problem?
Is it really the solution to Americas health care problem?
No. It is not. I shouldn't have to pay for crackheads to have medical care or for people to have government funded sex change operations.
However, healthcare options need to be made affordable. That much is certain.
Is it really the solution to Americas health care problem?
No. It is not. I shouldn't have to pay for crackheads to have medical care or for people to have government funded sex change operations.
However, healthcare options need to be made affordable. That much is certain.
UHC is one solution but reform is needed US, I'm going to lose my insurance next month so I'll have no coverage just as 50 million other Americans have nothing unless I get a new job or get into a university I'll have no coverage.
The reason reform is needed is because 60% of all bankruptcies are due to medical expenses! and the vast majority of those people roughly 78% had insurance! So even if you are insured you can have gaps in your coverage that can leave you just as screwed as someone with nothing!
A source for my statistics:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/06/05/bankruptcy.medical.bills/index.html
This is absolutely disgusting:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/19/begala.health.care/index.html
Who would have thought providing healthcare to sick children for free wasn't very profitable?:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/06/08/shriners.hospitals/index.html
If you think doing nothing is the best thing you have your head in the sand, I also wouldn't blame the government either.
UHC is one solution but reform is needed US, I'm going to lose my insurance next month so I'll have no coverage just as 50 million other Americans have nothing unless I get a new job or get into a university I'll have no coverage.
The reason reform is needed is because 60% of all bankruptcies are due to medical expenses! and the vast majority of those people roughly 78% had insurance! So even if you are insured you can have gaps in your coverage that can leave you just as screwed as someone with nothing!
A source for my statistics:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/06/05/bankruptcy.medical.bills/index.html
This is absolutely disgusting:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/19/begala.health.care/index.html
Who would have thought providing healthcare to sick children for free wasn't very profitable?:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/06/08/shriners.hospitals/index.html
If you think doing nothing is the best thing you have your head in the sand, I also wouldn't blame the government either.
Well that's why me and they wife filed out 1st bankruptcy: She lost her insurance, and the medical bills from my son's birth left us no choice. Example: We paid ahead and up front for most of the procedures, insurance got the rest. Jump to 60 days latter and the bills come flooding in for stuff the insurance refuses to pay: Emergency deliver fee cause my son was not born at his predicted time on his predicted date ($6,000+ just for the Dr alone), aspirin: $150 each, 6 meals in hospital $75 a meal, formula and diapers for our son $300 for 2 days. All in all it ended up being around $17,000 to $18,000 due within 30 days.
UHC is one solution but reform is needed US, I'm going to lose my insurance next month so I'll have no coverage just as 50 million other Americans have nothing unless I get a new job or get into a university I'll have no coverage.
The reason reform is needed is because 60% of all bankruptcies are due to medical expenses! and the vast majority of those people roughly 78% had insurance! So even if you are insured you can have gaps in your coverage that can leave you just as screwed as someone with nothing!
A source for my statistics:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/06/05/bankruptcy.medical.bills/index.html
This is absolutely disgusting:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/19/begala.health.care/index.html
Who would have thought providing healthcare to sick children for free wasn't very profitable?:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/06/08/shriners.hospitals/index.html
If you think doing nothing is the best thing you have your head in the sand, I also wouldn't blame the government either.
Well that's why me and they wife filed out 1st bankruptcy: She lost her insurance, and the medical bills from my son's birth left us no choice. Example: We paid ahead and up front for most of the procedures, insurance got the rest. Jump to 60 days latter and the bills come flooding in for stuff the insurance refuses to pay: Emergency deliver fee cause my son was not born at his predicted time on his predicted date ($6,000+ just for the Dr alone), aspirin: $150 each, 6 meals in hospital $75 a meal, formula and diapers for our son $300 for 2 days. All in all it ended up being around $17,000 to $18,000 due within 30 days.
Ok why aren't you breast feeding the kid? You know how much you can save with that???
Is it really the solution to Americas health care problem?
In my family's case it would be.
We're going to be short every month now due to my wife's employer sponsored insurance bumping up the costs and reducing coverage; with another hit coming this fall when we get the 2nd half of the rate increase and reduction. To put it bluntly: Health insurance is going to force us into a Chapt. 13 or Chapt. 7, and there's not a damn thing we can do about it.
No. It is not. I shouldn't have to pay for crackheads to have medical care or for people to have government funded sex change operations.
However, healthcare options need to be made affordable. That much is certain.
and yet while you're denying those people, you're punishing innocent men, women, and children whose only "crime" is being on the bottom of the totem pole for whatever reason. And by all means lets not provide medical care for drug addicts, after all there's no chance that they'll spread a disease that could have been contained or treated, into the wider populace.
Is it really the solution to Americas health care problem?
No. It is not. I shouldn't have to pay for crackheads to have medical care or for people to have government funded sex change operations.
However, healthcare options need to be made affordable. That much is certain.
And hypothetically, if it could be shown that the best way to reduce healthcare costs was for everybody's taxes to pay into a shared system by which everyone got "free" healthcare organised by the state doing away with insurance companies, would you still reject it on the grounds that you were incidentally paying for the healthcare of people you don't think deserve it?
No. It is not. I shouldn't have to pay for crackheads to have medical care or for people to have government funded sex change operations.
However, healthcare options need to be made affordable. That much is certain.
And hypothetically, if it could be shown that the best way to reduce healthcare costs was for everybody's taxes to pay into a shared system by which everyone got "free" healthcare organised by the state doing away with insurance companies, would you still reject it on the grounds that you were incidentally paying for the healthcare of people you don't think deserve it?
No I would not. I don't believe effective state run healthcare is possible. It's been shown time and time again that people do not get the services they need in a timely manner, if at all.
Yeah right, there are no rich doctors except for surgeons. Give me a break.I can assure you no doctor is getting ''rich'' unless there plastic or brain surgeons. (my mom's a M.D. and my family aint livin in the lap ''O'' luxury)As long as no one sees it s a get rich quick scheme (like your current system) it certainly is an improvement.
And hypothetically, if it could be shown that the best way to reduce healthcare costs was for everybody's taxes to pay into a shared system by which everyone got "free" healthcare organised by the state doing away with insurance companies, would you still reject it on the grounds that you were incidentally paying for the healthcare of people you don't think deserve it?
No I would not. I don't believe effective state run healthcare is possible. It's been shown time and time again that people do not get the services they need in a timely manner, if at all.
And having no insurance and being unable to get any improves this situation how? For that matter, even people on insurance have died waiting for authorizations or being denied cause a bean counter decided that it wasn't medically necessary.
No I would not. I don't believe effective state run healthcare is possible. It's been shown time and time again that people do not get the services they need in a timely manner, if at all.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.