• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is Star Trek A Rebirth Or Just A Reunion?

Aike

Commander
Red Shirt
Yes, the movie is a success: over 30 million tickets have been sold worldwide.

But the week after the movie opened, I read that the core audience was people aged 30-49, according to Paramount´s marketing research.

People in that age span are basically those who watched the rerun´s of TOS in the 70s or grew up with TNG. They seem to have showed up in large numbers, especially in the US and the UK.

So is it a real rebirth of Trek or is it just a reunion of old trekkers? What is your take on it?
 
Yes, the movie is a success: over 30 million tickets have been sold worldwide.

But the week after the movie opened, I read that the core audience was people aged 30-49, according to Paramount´s marketing research.

People in that age span are basically those who watched the rerun´s of TOS in the 70s or grew up with TNG. They seem to have showed up in large numbers, especially in the US and the UK.

So is it a real rebirth of Trek or is it just a reunion of old trekkers? What is your take on it?
I don't know what the statistics are, but from what I've been seeing on IMDB, various Trek forums, Youtube, blogs, etc., there are lots of new fans who have been introduced to Trek via this movie. People who did not know anything about Trek or very little, and who loved the movie and are now asking old fans for info, renting DVDs or watching TOS online, asking in which order to watch the various series and movies. New fans watching TOS after having seen the movie, and writing about it in their blogs. Livejournal communities and bunch of new Youtube videos dedicated to Spock, Spock/Uhura, Kirk/Spock, Kirk/McCoy, with the clips from the movie (somehow I don't think it's the 40-somethings and 50-somethings who are making those fanvideos). Girls/young women starting threads on IMDB describing how they have fallen in love with Spock and asking "Is it weird that I find him so hot?", now knowing that there had previously been at least 10 threads with other females asking exactly the same thing. :D
 
This is a rebirth. I know a lot of people who had never seen Star Trek go out and watch it and love it. It's going to do huge numbers on DVD. It's back!
 
This is a rebirth. I know a lot of people who had never seen Star Trek go out and watch it and love it.

I'm inclined to agree with this.

Even judging by my personal experience, I've had friends in their early 20s who had never cared for Trek before bug me to go see it with them.
It was the main reason for 3 of the times I've seen ST.
And even in my youtube page which is 99% about the movie I get lots of people who claim this was their first Trek and they loved it.
The girly love over Quinto/Pine in particular is quite big too.

But to be honest I think that, in the end, it was both a rebirth and a reunion.
Because as the numbers suggest the majority of old trek fans was there and liked what it saw.
 
...I read that the core audience was people aged 30-49, according to Paramount´s marketing research.

Well then, that must be the whole truth and the beginning and end of it.

What this movie is, is the beginning of whatever future Star Trek has.
 
Yes, the movie is a success: over 30 million tickets have been sold worldwide.

But the week after the movie opened, I read that the core audience was people aged 30-49, according to Paramount´s marketing research.

People in that age span are basically those who watched the rerun´s of TOS in the 70s or grew up with TNG. They seem to have showed up in large numbers, especially in the US and the UK.

So is it a real rebirth of Trek or is it just a reunion of old trekkers? What is your take on it?

The research is accurate. It's qualitative, anecdotal evidence I know--but my audience was skewed older. It may bring in new fans none-the-less, but the majority of viewers were as the report described in my estimation. This reboot needed to be done, but it may have been 10 years too late--sort of like the cool new Dodge Charger design. Might of helped a little more for Chrysler in 1993 instead of waiting until 2009 to introduce something like that.
 
Considering that on-screen Star Trek was, plain and simply, dead before this film, I'd call it rebirth.
 
What research is this?

I think it was exit polls done on the opening weekend. I don´t have a link to the article, but it also said that the average audience rating of the movie was an "A".

I know tons of people who watched it without knowing shit about Trek. Everyone who I saw the picture with called it amazing, all of them saw TWOK but that was it. I'd be surprised if it made 250m on that audience alone.
 
B & B ran into the ground and there it was still laying until recently. If the info on the early script ideas for the Berman Trek XI are accurate, I think it would have done alot more harm to keep him going at the helm.

So, its a rebirth for the franchise.
 

Agreed.

This film isn't entirely a reunion (I do think that the previous generation of fans have brought a lot of revenue) but there are new fans who were introduced by this film. In my area Trek merchandise rarely - if ever - sells. Prior to the release of this film I visited a store called Saturday Afternoon Matinee (or something to that effect) that sold DVDs. The store had a section of Trek films and TV series that, literally, had quarter of an inch of dust settled on top of them. After the release of the film they are currently sold out of Trek.

Book stores are once again stocking Trek merchandise as opposed to Star Wars, toy stores have trek stuff again, there are actually teenagers that aren't considered geeks talking about Trek. It's a rebirth in that sense.
 
So is it a real rebirth of Trek or is it just a reunion of old trekkers? What is your take on it?


I think its both, I think it is a reunion for old trekkers, but also a rebirth. LOts of young people too. Everyone went and saw this movie!
 
Speaking as one of the "Old" :guffaw: Trekkers...... I think the NuTOS has a shot.
This is my first post so if the uberMods feel it needs to be moved elsewhere then so let it be written, then let it be moved...

From the opening scene, canon is out the window. Time travel is an old ST standby but at the end the timeline is normally restored thus making the boo boo all better. Not Now.

I like Canon. It allows the creation of a shared universe and allows other creators to get involved without mucking it up. That is one reason why the movies and TV series' have lasted so long and so well.

But, by leaving the movie as it was, all the canon is gone. McCoy likely will never save (or not) Edith. Spock isn't gonna ponfar all over Vulcan either. This movie actually paves the way for a ST:NuTOS without canon issues. They can boldly go places etc. Why the exceptionally young Capt JTK could discover the Borg since Scotty now knows Transwarp works.

On the movie itself, weaving opinion and possibly flawed logic.

Plot.
- Time Travel. Old standby. Almost ho hummed it and went for the second large popcorn.

Characters.
- I liked em all. But, I am one of the guys who are willing to suspend disbelief and cut some slack. Shatner will always be JTK, but the new kid does a great job on his own. Hope the Orion Girl comes back. She's hot.

Special effects.
-- Not the TOS Enterprise. I heard a lot of people in the audience complaining that the NuTOSEnterprise wasn't right. Those are purists. I know that TOS had buttons and sliders and levers. That was a logical progression from the 1960's tech. These FX were a logical progression from todays tech. I liked it. I really liked Archers enterprise where they tried to make it look less advanced than JTK's.

-- Imploding Vulcan was cool. Besides. Too much of ST was based on Vulcan. Now they will focus on something else.

Canon - Covered Above.

Logical Flaws.
- Spock /Uhura? What changes in the timeline fracture caused them to hook up. JTK was changed due to birth and a lack of Kirk Sr in his life. But, was there a reletive on the Kelvin that somehow didn't point Spock or Uhura in a direction that originally avoided thier getting all hot and bothered.
- Chasm in Iowa? No way. I lived in Iowa as a kid. Was this an aftereffect of Xindi Superweapon?

-- Military Structure: I personally served 22 Years on Active Duty as a US Marine. So anything off about the military gets me quick. Here goes. Please help me if you can. This is the only flaw that can possibly turn me off.

Ages: 17 Checkov / Sulu were way too young to have gone thru the academy and been commissioned. Noting the uniforms, they were not cadets.

The Ranks all out of alignment w/naval tradition. Spock was a Commander while Uhura and Kirk were cadets. While it makes great Movie, it would not work in real life. Even being awared the Congressional Medal of Honor equivelient would only bump JTK ONE RANK. There is no way that command of StarFleets newest ship would pass from Pike to Kirk based on a cadet who got lucky and showed some natural ability. I've personally mentored Marines with natural skill so as to fast track them. But, there is no track as fast as what was seen at the end of the flick. Part of JTK's greatness was how his experiences as a junior officer shaped him to become SF youngest captain ever.

- Escape from black hole: 1 drop "red matter" implodes a planet but a huge sphere of it only makes a small hole the enterprise can escape from?

Questions: - Assuming history was stable up to Kelvins destruction, what happened to crew? Not every member of SF would have been affected by the change. See the uhura spock question above.

Oh, and what happened to the moon by Vulcan? It was a moon that the TOS Spock was hiding on right? No planet should have sent the moon reeling or sucked it into the hole created etc. Would love to figure this out.

Likely that was too much for a first post. Off to work, great to meet y'all.
 
Yes, the movie is a success: over 30 million tickets have been sold worldwide.

But the week after the movie opened, I read that the core audience was people aged 30-49, according to Paramount´s marketing research.

People in that age span are basically those who watched the rerun´s of TOS in the 70s or grew up with TNG. They seem to have showed up in large numbers, especially in the US and the UK.

So is it a real rebirth of Trek or is it just a reunion of old trekkers? What is your take on it?

It's both! Why does it have to be either or?
 
I vote for re-birth.

I am a high school teacher in Elk Grove, CA. I teach at a fairly diverse suburban high school, and many of my students went to see this movie. Some multiple times. They enjoyed it, and BTW, these are the same students that gave me unending grief for my ST wallpaper on my computer, and my open excitement about this movie. They know that I am a "Star Trek Nerd" and although they still think a lot of the ST universe is nerd central, they enjoyed this movie, and if the next one looks as compelling, I am sure they will see it.

The NEXT story will determine the future of the franchise, they have them on the hook-they need a compelling next chapter to reel them in.

MRE
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top