• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"Museum" comedy beats "Terminator" at box office (Reuters)

thaniyo

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Red Shirt
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Ben Stiller beat Christian Bale in the North American weekend box office duel between their respective "Night at the Museum" and "Terminator" sequels, according to studio estimates issued on Sunday.


The 20th Century Fox comedy "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" sold $53.5 million worth of tickets during the three days beginning Friday, far exceeding the $30.4 million debut of its 2006 predecessor.



"Terminator Salvation" earned $43.0 million. The film fell short of the $44 million start for the previous entry in the cyborg series, 2003's "Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines," the swan song of franchise star Arnold Schwarzenegger.



But the race between the two new sequels was closer than it appeared because Warner Bros. got a head start on the U.S. Memorial Day holiday weekend by opening "Terminator" on Thursday, when it earned about $13.4 million. That takes the film's four-day total to $56.4 million.


The studios generally try to avoid each other when they roll out their big movies. In this case, "Night at the Museum" played to a broad audience, while "Terminator" was more targeted at male moviegoers.



Time Warner Inc-owned Warner Bros. said "Terminator" was likely more affected by competition for older men from the National Basketball Association playoffs, which hurt business in cities like Los Angeles.


Fox, a unit of News Corp, said the "Night at the Museum" opening set a new live-action record for Stiller. The film also opened in most international markets, earning $50.5 million.


Last weekend' North American champion, "Angels & Demons," slipped to No. 3 with $21.4 million, taking the 10-day total for Columbia Pictures' Tom Hanks religious thriller to $81.5 million. By contrast, its 2006 predecessor "The Da Vinci Code" had earned $136.5 million after the same period.


But the Sony Corp unit has said it never expected the second film to be as big, and noted it that it was the top choice internationally with sales of $60.4 million. Its foreign total now stands at $198.3 million.

(Editing by Alan Elsner)
:techman::techman::techman:
 
So, is Trek at #3 or #4? If the latter, that movie doesn't seem to be faring as well as many here would have us believe.
 
The article seems wrong.

Box Office Mojo has TrekXI at #3 ($21.9m) and A&D at #4 ($21.4m).

It's possible that the two are close that some places are getting conflicting numbers.

Even if Trek slips to #4 I'd still say that's a pretty darn good run for a 3-week old movie.
 
So, is Trek at #3 or #4? If the latter, that movie doesn't seem to be faring as well as many here would have us believe.

Star Trek is well on the way to becoming the biggest movie of the summer. Barring competition from entries later on...
 
I'd say Star Trek will end up as the #3 or #4 film of the summer in domestic box office, with Transformers 2, Harry Potter 6 and Up being the main contenders to fill the rest of the top spots. There's also Ice Age 3, but I think that'll come in below the aforementioned films.
 
So, is Trek at #3 or #4? If the latter, that movie doesn't seem to be faring as well as many here would have us believe.

Star Trek is well on the way to becoming the biggest movie of the summer. Barring competition from entries later on...

Pixar's Up and Transformers say hello.

I bolded the parts you missed.

I doubt "Up" will do Star Trek's numbers.

Transformers *might.*
 
So, is Trek at #3 or #4? If the latter, that movie doesn't seem to be faring as well as many here would have us believe.

Star Trek is well on the way to becoming the biggest movie of the summer. Barring competition from entries later on...

Star Trek has a shot at biggest movie in May. Transformers 2 and Potter will do better than Trek.

Those films have much broader appeal, and barring poor reviews, should easily knock New-Trek out of contention for biggest movie of the summer. Sorry, Trek ain't that big.
 
Shouldn't people be comparing Star Trek to MI3, as it is much closer to a Mission Impossible film than a Trek movie anyway?
 
So, is Trek at #3 or #4? If the latter, that movie doesn't seem to be faring as well as many here would have us believe.

Huh?

There is virtually no difference between 3 and 4 here in the numbers. In fact the reason there's no clear answer is because the margin is razor thin.

How the heck can One be good while the other bad? It's literally 21.9 m vs 21.4 m
 
Shouldn't people be comparing Star Trek to MI3, as it is much closer to a Mission Impossible film than a Trek movie anyway?

No it shouldn't because no, it isn't. It's a Trek film through-and-through.

Transformers is definitely competition and so is Harry Potter. I think Up will be neck-in-neck with Trek for 3rd place as Pixar's films seem to float around what Trek is estimated to land at ($225 mil - $250 mil.)

Here are the last few of Pixar's domestic takes for comparison...

WALL-E: $223,808,164
Ratatouille:
$206,445,654
Cars:
$244,082,982
The Incredibles:
$261,441,092

Some analysts have theorized the disadvantage Up has is marketability: how are you supposed to sell toys for a movie that stars "an old guy"? Stupid, I know but there might be some validity to that. However if the film gets good reviews (which is a guarantee, it's Pixar after all) I think it will still land around $210 mil., landing right in Trek territory.
 
So, is Trek at #3 or #4? If the latter, that movie doesn't seem to be faring as well as many here would have us believe.

Huh?

There is virtually no difference between 3 and 4 here in the numbers. In fact the reason there's no clear answer is because the margin is razor thin.

How the heck can One be good while the other bad? It's literally 21.9 m vs 21.4 m


Some people need this movie to fail, for whatever reason. It's gotten to the point in the Trek XI forum where you have posters pointing to negative reviews as proof they're right while attacking positive reviews because there's no way they can be right.
 
So, is Trek at #3 or #4? If the latter, that movie doesn't seem to be faring as well as many here would have us believe.

Huh?

There is virtually no difference between 3 and 4 here in the numbers. In fact the reason there's no clear answer is because the margin is razor thin.

How the heck can One be good while the other bad? It's literally 21.9 m vs 21.4 m


Some people need this movie to fail, for whatever reason. It's gotten to the point in the Trek XI forum where you have posters pointing to negative reviews as proof they're right while attacking positive reviews because there's no way they can be right.

Actually, I see the opposite problem: people jumping on any movie that might potentially threaten Trek's place in the rankings. The difference between #3 and #4 is slight, but Trek will be out of the Top 5 in a few weeks regardless. Some seem to think the movie will somehow stay at or near the top for many weeks, and that's just a pipe dream.

And my last time in the Trek XI forum, it was the detractors of the movie that were getting smacked around, though maybe that has changed with only an (overly) vocal minority left criticizing the film.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top