Seeing I can't find a thread about this yet, thought I'd start.
Since the late 90s, the Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) has been a great source of amusement, ever since I flicked past the show one night and saw a pop group that looked like the Outer Mongolian version of the Spice Girls. There has been some weird and whacky stuff over the years, as well as some really good pop songs. Plus one year 2000, there was this interval act that just blew me away - street perfomers from Stockholm, plus a bunch of other dancers and drummers, with video footage that captures a brief but brilliant snapshot of a nation and a culture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kulVHmJOjXU
For me, the ESC reached a peak in, iirc, 2005 or 6. The last couple of years have been, to me, pretty bland, and the block voting was getting old.
So with some trepidation I looked in at the setup for this year, and found a few things out.
One the voting this year will be half telephone, half jury. This could be a good idea, as it should break the monopoly of block votes and award the song some points on the merit of its quality alone.
Which brings me to my other point. Here in Australia we've been getting a ahlf hour show over 3 nights 'Countdown to Eurovision', which has snatces of all of this year's songs. While there are some I don't like, there aren't really that many duds. Some aren't great, but the quality is way up on the last few years. I'm a bit sad about that, as some of the left-of-field stuff was bloody funny.
I have to add that the UK entry, I think, is a bit so-so, but wow, talk about pulling out the big guns! The songwriters are Andrew Lloyd Webber and Diane Warren!
They must really want to win after the fiasco of the last 3-4 years (Scootch and Jemini, I'm looking at you!).
And no Terry Wogan!!
He really hasn't enjoyed it the last few years, but still...
So, right now, I haven't seen any of the semi-finals, we're getting them Down Under Friday and Saturday, the final on Sunday. Ummm, don't be too spoilerish, is all I ask.
For those who want to know more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurovision_2009
What are your thoughts?
Since the late 90s, the Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) has been a great source of amusement, ever since I flicked past the show one night and saw a pop group that looked like the Outer Mongolian version of the Spice Girls. There has been some weird and whacky stuff over the years, as well as some really good pop songs. Plus one year 2000, there was this interval act that just blew me away - street perfomers from Stockholm, plus a bunch of other dancers and drummers, with video footage that captures a brief but brilliant snapshot of a nation and a culture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kulVHmJOjXU
For me, the ESC reached a peak in, iirc, 2005 or 6. The last couple of years have been, to me, pretty bland, and the block voting was getting old.
So with some trepidation I looked in at the setup for this year, and found a few things out.
One the voting this year will be half telephone, half jury. This could be a good idea, as it should break the monopoly of block votes and award the song some points on the merit of its quality alone.
Which brings me to my other point. Here in Australia we've been getting a ahlf hour show over 3 nights 'Countdown to Eurovision', which has snatces of all of this year's songs. While there are some I don't like, there aren't really that many duds. Some aren't great, but the quality is way up on the last few years. I'm a bit sad about that, as some of the left-of-field stuff was bloody funny.
I have to add that the UK entry, I think, is a bit so-so, but wow, talk about pulling out the big guns! The songwriters are Andrew Lloyd Webber and Diane Warren!

And no Terry Wogan!!

So, right now, I haven't seen any of the semi-finals, we're getting them Down Under Friday and Saturday, the final on Sunday. Ummm, don't be too spoilerish, is all I ask.
For those who want to know more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurovision_2009
What are your thoughts?