You don't even have to come back in a year. It's a success.jeez come back in a year and then say whether its a flop or not. Its way to early to tell. Fight Club was a "flop" but made its money back through rental and is regarded as a classic.
. Flop. Big fat flop.
Not really. There's enough data that if you know something about box office patterns one can say that it's highly likely to end up as a hit and to lead to a sequel.Its way to early to tell.
This isn't even a debate; the movie is a runaway success. It's a fact.
Plus, the sequel has already been green-lit, so they knew they'd have a success even before it was released. While they were predicting a $50 million opening weekend.
This isn't even a debate; the movie is a runaway success. It's a fact.
Hasn't been officially greenlit, but I'm sure it won't be long before it happens.
As Paramount Pictures readies the May 8 release of its "Star Trek" franchise relaunch, the studio is moving forward with a sequel, and has hired Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof to pen the screenplay.
J.J. Abrams, who directed and produced the latest chapter, is onboard to produce the follow-up alongside his Bad Robot partner Bryan Burk. No decision has been made yet on whether Abrams will return behind the camera for the sequel. Orci, Kurtzman and Lindelof also are receiving producing credit on the sequel
THIRDEDUse your search engines. The original production cost proposal was 120 million. The movie ended up costing 160 million fact. The advertising costs reach somewhere in the ballpark of 100 million. These numbers are all over the internet. Deny it all you want, it doesn't change the fact that many websites are reporting the same numbers. Use your search engines and stop calling people idiots.
Nobody's denying anything, dude. Why don't you show us some links? And while you're at it, why don't you give us some links to some projected returns and actual returns? And while you're at it, why don't you do some research into DVDs, merchandising, tie-ins, and promotional fees? And then why don't you put it into a handy spreadsheet with some other movies' statistics for comparative analysis? Maybe put in successful and unsuccessful film performance one week, one month, and six months out.
After you do all that, why don't you present your work to Paramount's marketing department so they can marvel at your genius?
Seconded. Odo's_Bucket, if you have hard data, please present it, otherwise you are wandering in the land of supposition.
J.
Sorry, I might have used the wrong term; that's the article I was thinking of. "Moving forward" then.
It cost 160 million to produce and God knows what to advertise. Some estimate that the advertising cost up to 100 million. It's only made 86 million of that back. Without counting for advertising, it's still 74 million dollars in debt. Add the unconfirmed estimate for the advertising and it's 174 million dollars in debt, which is more that the original production cost. Flop. Big fat flop.
It cost 160 million to produce and God knows what to advertise. Some estimate that the advertising cost up to 100 million. It's only made 86 million of that back. Without counting for advertising, it's still 74 million dollars in debt. Add the unconfirmed estimate for the advertising and it's 174 million dollars in debt, which is more that the original production cost. Flop. Big fat flop.
Odo's Bucket, why do you think the box office is the totality of the revenue?
So am I.Odo's Bucket, why do you think the box office is the totality of the revenue?
That's what I'm wondering.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.