• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Grade the movie...

  • Excellent

    Votes: 711 62.9%
  • Above Average

    Votes: 213 18.8%
  • Average

    Votes: 84 7.4%
  • Below Average

    Votes: 46 4.1%
  • Poor

    Votes: 77 6.8%

  • Total voters
    1,131
How does a giant brewer feel "realistic" for an engine room for a FTL starship?

Some of the wider shots were iffy, in that it was implausible that such a sprawling facility would or could be contained within a starship, but the basic aesthetic worked well enough.
 
At first I thought it needed to be at the center of a major gravity well for Red Matter to create a singularity. I thought that is why they bothered to drill. But then they created one in open space. Unless the mass and warp drive of his ship was creates enough of a gravity well to start the process.
Well, that's the convenience of using a plot device you never bother to explain in any meaningful detail!...

Hello to everyone on the boards!
This is my first post...

The New Look: Awesome 5/5
...a sense of epic scope rarely before seen in Trek...

The Cast of Characters: Excellent 5/5
I don’t see how this could have been better, reasonably speaking....

The Plot: Terrible 1/5
As much as I would like to be enthusiastic about every aspect of this movie, the plot is pretty bad...

Blockbuster Action and Comedy: Very Good 4/5
Some of the humor I could have done without, for example Scotty beaming into the pipes, but much of it flowed from the characters...

What it worth it to have Spock Prime around?
This is the main hypothetical I am left considering...

Intellectual Value
Star Trek can be thought-provoking, and this movie for the most part was not. This is not a criticism (a movie cannot do everything at once), but it is an important observation...
Great first post, Flemm, and I agree with a lot of your assessments (although I'd perhaps knock the grade down a point or two for "The Look": the production values were great, but IMHO the cinematography was eccentric, and the design aesthetic was wildly inconsistent.)

While the film isn't without redeeming qualities, though, what outweighs all the rest for me is the problems (as you acknowledge) with the story. Without a strong, well-written story at the center, all the pretty pictures and good acting in the world will amount to nothing. All else being equal, saying it's not thought-provoking is a criticism, a very serious one, there's no way around it. The most important take-away from your review, IMHO, is this: "I should not have to turn off my brain to enjoy a Star Trek movie, quite the opposite."

A lot of people seem to be defending it on the basis that it's impressive-looking and exciting. And for the most part, it is. But so what? What does all that amount to without a good story? It's all visceral thrills, no brain.

Well, I can see from reading this that there are some major plot points I must have missed, like Nero saying he had already saved Romulus (but only in the alternate timeline, not the original). Can someone answer me this, though: what was Nero and crew doing in the 25 years while they waited for Spock to fly through the singularity? And did the singularity close up after spitting out Nero's ship, then open up again 25 years later to spit out Spock's, or was it open for the whole 25 years? Did they explain either of these things?
Nope and nope, and I never noticed him saying anything about having saved Romulus, either.

...The production value was top notch. The acting was very good for the most part and the character moments were great.

However, the plot just wasn't very good at all. It ultimately suffered from the same problem every other Trek film has: little substance, massive plot holes, forced plot points, and trite villains.

I also don't like the rapid cutting. I know it's the new "thing" these days. But I've never liked it. To me that only thing that ends up getting cut is content.

This is a symptom of my biggest gripe: the awful pacing. It was like Star Trek for ADD kids.
Couldn't agree more with this. (Except that not every other Trek film is as badly plotted as this one. It really was worse than most.)

One thing I liked, Uhura saying an "alternate reality", it drives a stake in the ground that says yes, this is a new universe for sure. It works for me, our star trek still exists in an another reality, and now the audience is watching this new reality, we just aren't able to see the old one anymore, works for me.
You liked that? Not being able to see the old one any more is really not a selling point for me. To make it one, the new version would have to be better than what it's replacing, and this movie sure didn't make a case for that.

That said, I enjoyed the movie for what it was, a Star-Wars-esque summer action-romp.
Well, first of all, that's the last thing Star Trek should be trying to be (indeed, that "Star Wars" flavor is what many of us were fearing from Abrams from the start). But second, even on those terms, it really didn't manage to be enjoyable. Some people seem to think story logic and plausibility are optional features in summer movies, but I've never understood that POV.
 
Last edited:
Loved the characters...the f/x were awesome, and the movie never dragged. I'm looking forward to seeing these characters together again for a sequel or sequels...

What I hated was that the entire history of all this crew from the TV series, TWOK, through to TUC was just wiped out!!!

Yes, the possibilities are endless now, BUT, am I the only one who's terribly upset about this??!

No more Vulcan...no more Romulus??? I'm not taking this very well...
 
Loved the characters...the f/x were awesome, and the movie never dragged. I'm looking forward to seeing these characters together again for a sequel or sequels...

What I hated was that the entire history of all this crew from the TV series, TWOK, through to TUC was just wiped out!!!

Yes, the possibilities are endless now, BUT, am I the only one who's terribly upset about this??!

No more Vulcan...no more Romulus??? I'm not taking this very well...

The Romulans are still there in this universe at this point in time.
 
How does a giant brewer feel "realistic" for an engine room for a FTL starship?

It just didn't work for me when Kirk is running past huge vats of something.

hmm did you say vats

tubes??

Those vats look nothing like the brewery vats we saw in the movie.

Those tubes are less invasive. Here we can see the actual walls, and they are well covered. In the movie, pipes and tubes are everywhere, not just embedded into walls.
 
So, I liked the movie as a big bombastic action movie but unfortunately it didn't really tread any new ground. But I think that's fine - I'm sure it was written to establish the characters and the new actors rather than try to tell any new interesting stories and I'm okay with that. I also don't mind that it was very similar to ST2 - at least it was better than Nemesis, which tried to do the same thing.

I guess the Trek fan in me just doesn't understand why the reset button wasn't hit. I mean, I don't want them to hit the reset button - but the way time travel has been used as a catchall solution to any problem in Star Trek (save the whales!), I felt that they needed to introduce a real reason why these characters wouldn't try to do their best to stop Vulcan from being destroyed.

The other thing is just the anime convention of having kids with extraordinary abilities being promoted to positions normally filled by adults. I guess I don't really know my TOS history, but it seems almost preposterous that a cadet would suddenly become Captain of the flagship of the fleet, regardless of his exceptional showing on this one particular mission.
Given that people HATED HATED HATED Wesley Crusher, I can't understand how anyone would let this go.

But oh well, as a reboot, I'm fine with it. I don't care enough about Trek nowadays to worry about timelines and whatnot. As long as you can tell a decent story, I'm fine with it.

That said, I would rather that this movie led into a new TV series than a new movie franchise. I guess it's too much to ask, given that they'd probably make more money with a trilogy than a new series, but I think television suits Star Trek more than film... especially because Star Trek shouldn't be about the space battles and on film, it's almost unavoidable that the ship will be forced to fire phasers at some point or another.
 
How does a giant brewer feel "realistic" for an engine room for a FTL starship?

It just didn't work for me when Kirk is running past huge vats of something.

hmm did you say vats

tubes??

Those vats look nothing like the brewery vats we saw in the movie.

Those tubes are less invasive. Here we can see the actual walls, and they are well covered. In the movie, pipes and tubes are everywhere, not just embedded into walls.

The Enterprise is a big damn ship. Surely you don't think what you see here is all of Engineering?

J.
 
Read my latest reply in my other thread about the tubing, I agree with you on having tubes in engineering, I just think it was overdone.
 
^ Replied. Plus, we need to focus this somewhere. I hate having to cover two locations on the same subject. :p


J.
 
All I can say tonight....is HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!1!@#!@!!! Abrams.......FUCKING EXCELLENT!!!

More tomorrow, I am wiped.
 
All I can say tonight....is HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!1!@#!@!!! Abrams.......FUCKING EXCELLENT!!!

More tomorrow, I am wiped.

Glad you loved it. My reaction is the same to yours. :D

I'd much rather have movies like this than a new TV series, right now.

I agree

Movie land is better IMO, bigger budget, bigger stories, less drawn out

Agreed! Plus they have more time to flesh out a script, rather than trying to write a new one for each week.

J.
 
Hey, what's up with the "phasers" ?

They are now disrupter style instead of beam weapons!
 
Hey, what's up with the "phasers" ?

They are now disrupter style instead of beam weapons!

I'm okay with that, though. I liked the changeup, because even though phaser beams are pretty cool, a short burst uses less energy and can still do great damage.

J.
 
A lot of people seem to be defending it on the basis that it's impressive-looking and exciting. And for the most part, it is. But so what? What does all that amount to without a good story? It's all visceral thrills, no brain.

I think most of us agree that the backstory and time travel plots were poorly explained and executed. But that really only made up a small part of the overall story.

The MAIN story dealt with Kirk and Spock and their respective journeys, and the meeting of the original Enterprise crew. I thought that was all handled quite well.

The Nero/time travel stuff was just a backdrop to all that (although I agree, I wish it was handled better).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top