• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Do you still follow the religion you were raised with?

Do you still follow the religion you were raised with?


  • Total voters
    160
Another raised Catholic turned Atheist here. There seem to be a lot of us. :techman:

That's probably just because there are so many Catholics.

Protestants tend to identify with their own little splinter rather than with Protestantism. They'll say "Northern Conservative Fundamentalist Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879" instead of "Protestant."

Either that, or they'll say "Christian," when they really mean "Protestant"--or even when they mean "Northern Conservative Fundamentalist Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879."
 
Last edited:
Soft agnosticism is actually compatible with theism.

What I like about you, Camelopard, is that if I wait long enough, I can guarantee that you post what I want to in a thread and save me the trouble. ;)

I drift between soft agnosticism and vague theism depending on how much I choose to think on any given day.

Philosophers have offered a variety of solutions for this problem, and the book is about "how philosophers have died and what we can learn from philosophy about the appropriate attitude toward death and dying."...
"Christianity," he says, "is about nothing other than getting ready to die."

Personally, I believe that it's not that Christianity per se is about getting ready to die, but that human life itself is about getting ready to die. The human mind is not designed to cope with the knowledge of our mortality. The curse of sentience is a keen awareness of our own inevitable mortality - it's probably driven us to greater heights of achievement, allowed us to largely rid ourselves of evolutionary pressure, and yet is an ever-present cloud over our heads and a challenge we are all forced to confront.

Religion, Philosophy, Politics, Family, Money, Art - all ways of sidestepping death (or rather, convincing ourselves that we have done so).
 
What I like about you, Camelopard, is that if I wait long enough, I can guarantee that you post what I want to in a thread and save me the trouble. ;)

What? Nonsense!

...

...

...

"Margaret Thatcher's free-market reforms, while painful in the short-term, were absolutely essential for Britain's long-term prosperity."

:eek:

:shifty:

*Reaches for tinfoil hat*
 
There was no religion in my upbringing, and I'm still of the non-religious persuasion. I am fascinated by religion and what it says about people/society/humanity, though.
 
There was no religion in my upbringing, and I'm still of the non-religious persuasion. I am fascinated by religion and what it says about people/society/humanity, though.
I'm the same, but I can't be arsed to read any of the books... whenever I try they make me feel dirty, and not in a good way.
 
There was no religion in my upbringing, and I'm still of the non-religious persuasion. I am fascinated by religion and what it says about people/society/humanity, though.
I'm the same, but I can't be arsed to read any of the books... whenever I try they make me feel dirty, and not in a good way.
In that case it's away to The Order Of Apathetic And Metaphorical Soap-Dodgers for you, young Bob!
 
What I like about you, Camelopard, is that if I wait long enough, I can guarantee that you post what I want to in a thread and save me the trouble. ;)

What? Nonsense!

...

...

...

"Margaret Thatcher's free-market reforms, while painful in the short-term, were absolutely essential for Britain's long-term prosperity."

:eek:

:shifty:

*Reaches for tinfoil hat*

We'll make a Tory out of you yet. :cool: :p
 
I was raised in the LDS Church but left at the age of 16 when I realized that I had only been going through the motions for the last several years.

I didn't leave because I had no belief in God, I left because there had been a part of me that was never sure. Because of this doubt, I felt it was inappropriate for me to take part in the sacrament.

I could and would never claim atheism. Years ago my Grandfather, a man who has never been big on faith and stopped going to church after World War II, expressed an opinion that stuck with me, "There is no such thing as a true atheist. To be truly atheist is to know everything." I could see his reasoning behind this and I agreed with it. Personally the most wacky explanation for existance that I have heard is "We're just here and then we die." But then again, to each thier own.

I'm not going to go into any detail here but over the last year I have begun incrementally making my way back. After many questions and much soul searching I believe I have made the right decision.
 
I was raised Jewish, and try and put in an appearance in Shabbat services on a Friday night. However, I'm not so good at the entire keeping kosher thing as I can't resist cheeseburgers.
 
I was never raised with any religion - Christianity looks as equally bizarre (god comes to earth to be nailed to plank of wood) to me as Scientology.
 
The only religion to which I was exposed as a child was Catholicism, primarily at my grandmother's insistence. At no point was it a part of our lives, and I certainly don't recall ever being told anything about the mythology as if it was something to be credited.

My mother made a few half-hearted and totally arbitrary swipes at actually practicing for a while there when I was about 8-10, but gave up pretty quickly as it was clear than no one was interested, including her. I was sent to Catholic school for 5-8th grades, but that was not religiously motivated; it was simply the best financial option following my parents' divorce when money was too tight to afford the significantly more expensive private school I attended before that. Fortunatley, they found a pretty liberal one that took people of many backgrounds and excused people from most of the religious crap if they weren't down with it.

And yes, I'm still a devout non-theist.
 
I was raised without religion, though kind of took God's existence for granted when I was young and didn't have better explanations for things. Got older, more intelligent, and more educated and dropped the idea, even going so far as to become opposed to it altogether.

Raised Catholic. Currently Christian.
Point of curiosity - aren't Catholics Christians? What distinction are you making, exactly? I realize that there is some infighting between sects, and some don't consider others to be true Christians. When I told a nice couple who helped me with a blown tire that my girlfriend attended a Seventh-Day Adventist Church, they replied that they went to a "Christian church". Is this what you're getting at?
 
Interesting responses so far everyone, thanks. I did kind of wonder about individuals who follow a different sect of a belief system (like Christianity) than the one their parents did; I see there are a few such people here. As to whether or not the current sect/denomination is so fundamentally different from the old one as to constitute a wholly new religion, well... I leave that for you to decide.

Well, my faith differs in that while I believe Jesus as the central figure of my faith, I consider Jewish Mystics, Sufi Mystics, Buddhists and Hindus to be correct in many things, also, and that God is one God but with many facets. Mysticism also involves direct communication with God. Church is not required, neither is many other traditions held today in Mainstream Christianity. I meditate on the spirit, which is a little different than what others may do. I believe that the universe is an extension of God's awareness, and that we can affect this universe by connecting with God.

J.

I too have a very open-minded view of Christianity and a bit of an unexpected 're-awakening' of that faith in the past year.

Church may not be necessary but, it can be useful for social contacts. That's why I started going to one last summer. However, I quit going there in January. It was a very left-leaning church and they went too far one Sunday. Having some useless petition to impeach George Bush was something I could ignore. Having guest speakers from the ACLU one week allowed me the opportunity to see an issue (in this case, the 'Driving while Black' problem in some rural Louisiana communities) from someone else's view. However, the MLK sermon on the Sunday before MLK day was too much.

The reverend was a woman who grew up in the 1960's and took part in the Civil Rights movement. One would think she'd like to leave the differences between Whites and Blacks in the past. She's not willing or able. She actually said (albiet politely) that we White people need to 'deal with our Whiteness' and that we can't see things from the Black man's point of view.

I call B.S. on that for 3 reasons.

1.) Despite being White, I can see things from the Black man's point of view.

It's the same view that anyone in their place would have and I haven't always been Mr. Popular. I can imagine just how angry some of them are because I have had that anger myself. I know what it's like for everyone to have pre-concieved notions about you and distrust/hate you. Trust me, it sucks.

2.) I don't need to 'deal with my Whiteness', she needs to deal with her misplaced White Guilt.

She is not responsible for Slavery, Jim Crow or Apartheid. She also took part in dismantling both Jim Crow and Apartheid. There's no reason for her to feel guilty about anything at all.

3.) The current-day problems of the Black Community are problems they created on their own without Whitey's help.

Lord knows that if I had sway over them they wouldn't have 70% of their kids out of wedlock.

Me and my Whiteness are just peachy.

Frankly, that church didn't talk about Jesus enough anyway...

EDIT TO ADD: I was brought-up in a Non-denominational church that we quit attending when I was 12. The pastor wanted more money and my Father didn't agree with that proposition.
 
No. I was raised Baptist, and I went Athiest several years back. It was a variety of things that kinda got me turned off religion... for starts, it was a very hateful group of people. If you were gay, you were wrong. If you were of another religion (including other sects of Christianity) you were wrong. If you were Muslim or Mormon, you were doubly wrong. If you didn't believe exactly the way we believed, you were going to hell, end of story. I also had issues with the fact that there were things that didn't click with me, but I was discouraged from asking questions. They would try to make my questions go away by giving me answers that directly contradicted science and everything else i had come to learn. It had just reached a point that between the hate and the inconsistancies and questions that I couldn't explain away, I decided I needed to jump ship.

That sounds like the Southern Baptists to me. IIRC, that's also the same thing Roddenberry thought about the Southern Baptist faith his parents tried to give him. I can understand why that POV would be rejected. Hating other people that are different is not what Gene & Jesus were all about at all.
 
Raised Catholic. Currently Christian.
Point of curiosity - aren't Catholics Christians?

According to most people, yes.

According to narrow-minded Protestant zealots, no.

Hence, the following:

Camelopard said:
Raised Catholic. Currently Christian. And no bashing forthcoming from our side.

Oh, the irony...
I suspect as much myself, but I'd like to hear it from TLS for clarification.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top