• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

The reboot makes sense to me. Alternate universe means that the current franchise can still exist and spawn stories and/or that the timeline can be righted. If it's true that Old Spock stays in NuTrek universe, then this forms the bridge between the two universes that makes us give a damn in the first place. Just suppose there hadn't been a reboot/alternate universe... OK, we KNOW everything is going to work out predictably, and that everyone is going to be okay... so then why should we even GIVE A DAMN? But it's been established that anything can happen. Nuking Vulcan creates more story potential, IMO. And no, I haven't seen the movie.

That's a pretty callous comment-- everyone is NOT going to be okay. And some of us do give a damn about killing an entire planet that has played a very important part in the mythos.
 
In the death of Star Trek, It is reborn into something different yet fundamentally the same. Which is what this movie is all about, and I cant help but hope the loss of Vulcan will ruin your enjoyment of what is essentially a brilliant movie.

That is the one hang up for me. I don't mind small changes, but this is an awfully big one that changes the dynamic of Star Trek completely.

Agreed, although I'm sure that's exactly the point. ;)

What I'm worried about is how this will change Spock's friendship with Kirk. I know Spock is Vulcan, trained to logic, but will he see Kirk as a failure because Kirk and the Enterprise couldn't save Vulcan? I know it was Nero who actually destroyed the planet, but Kirk could have stopped him - and failed. Will Spock hold a grudge against Kirk? The emotional wallop of having your entire race pretty much wiped out could do that to anyone, even Spock.

Um from what I've heard Spock was in command of the Enterprise at the time, so under Trek Captain rules he'd be the one that failed.

Someone on the TOS board just suggested that JJ should recast T'Pring for a sequel movie.

I made a comment about the hopes of something "unfortunate" happening to her in the new timeline before Spock's Pon Farr, then I realized...

With Vulcan being destroyed, wouldn't it be a SHAME if a certain someone didn't make it off the planet in time? (Throw Stonn in while you're at it, if you like.)

Plus if Uhura and Spock stay together he's set for Pom Farr.

The reboot makes sense to me. Alternate universe means that the current franchise can still exist and spawn stories and/or that the timeline can be righted. If it's true that Old Spock stays in NuTrek universe, then this forms the bridge between the two universes that makes us give a damn in the first place. Just suppose there hadn't been a reboot/alternate universe... OK, we KNOW everything is going to work out predictably, and that everyone is going to be okay... so then why should we even GIVE A DAMN? But it's been established that anything can happen. Nuking Vulcan creates more story potential, IMO. And no, I haven't seen the movie.

That's a pretty callous comment-- everyone is NOT going to be okay. And some of us do give a damn about killing an entire planet that has played a very important part in the mythos.

A planet that they visited maybe 3 or 4 times, yeah very important planet to the mythos.
 
The reboot makes sense to me. Alternate universe means that the current franchise can still exist and spawn stories and/or that the timeline can be righted. If it's true that Old Spock stays in NuTrek universe, then this forms the bridge between the two universes that makes us give a damn in the first place. Just suppose there hadn't been a reboot/alternate universe... OK, we KNOW everything is going to work out predictably, and that everyone is going to be okay... so then why should we even GIVE A DAMN? But it's been established that anything can happen. Nuking Vulcan creates more story potential, IMO. And no, I haven't seen the movie.

That's a pretty callous comment-- everyone is NOT going to be okay. And some of us do give a damn about killing an entire planet that has played a very important part in the mythos.


The fact that you give a damn is the whole point they did it.

Christ, its basic Drama 101. The whole tedium of everything being just nice and left alone is the whole reason Trek died a death in the first place.
 
apparently, Human women don't fare so well during Pon Farr ;)

Well, how does one explain Spock, then? Amanda seems to have come through it all right.

Reverse cowgirl, perhaps?

Sarek was in his late sixties to early seventies when he and Amanda had Spock, well past Sarek's youthful prime (at least that was the case in the mainline Star Trek universe; who the hell knows in this case).

And, as noted, who said Spock was conceived during pon farr? Vulcans are quite capable of mating anytime they damn well please.
 
I think Vulcans' "youthful prime" may well be in their 50s through their 70s, or even 80s. remember, Spock is not the typical Vulcan. as such, his aging process is "tainted" by his human half. Sarek is a full Vulcan. he may well have married Sybok's mother in his youth, and Amanda in his youngish-middle age.

agreed about the Pon Farr/conception point. who knows, mayhap nuTrek can and will answer some of those hitherto pesky and largely unanswered questions.
 
You know, this is something that has always fascinated me about Vulcans...

On the one hand, they're stated as being naturally much more emotional than humans, so much so that their passionate nature drove them to near destruction and as a result they've (or at least the majority we've seen!) adopted a life of stoicism...

And then you see characters like Spock and Tuvok...they turn their noses down at "illogical , emotional humans", but when cornered, cannot deny they feel the same things humans do...I remember one instance where Tuvok was asked about whether or not he "loved" his children...he stated something to the effect that his family is a part of him, and he cannot imagine living without them (in other words, yes, he does love his children! lol) Sarek apparently went against the grain and married Amanda because "it was the logical thing to do", but when Picard was given the chance to peer inside of Sarek's mind, so to speak, he told Amanda that he "loved her more than she knows" (or something, again, I'm paraphrasing)

So to try to make this rambling post shorter, I think throwing the Vulcans in this alternate universe in the situation of being an "endangered" species will play out very interestingly...they may have to re-think some of their philosphies..the constant haughtiness and condescension (sp?) with which they've been shown treating other races in the past will not serve them well if they are to become refugees on a planet like, say, Earth...will their logic really suffice to keep the race alive? 10,000 people may seem like alot, but I have two very good friends who are both biology grad students, and they have told me that 10,000 is not a promising number in terms of survival..

I know what I'm saying is blasphemous to some, there are so many of you who have taken the loss of Vulcan as a serious blow...I think it proves your dedication to this franchise, and I admire you...so many people don't understand how emotionally involved people can become by art...thats why such people never produce much creatively..

My only hope is that out of this loss, many intriguing storylines will follow...
 
I think Vulcans' "youthful prime" may well be in their 50s through their 70s, or even 80s. remember, Spock is not the typical Vulcan. as such, his aging process is "tainted" by his human half. Sarek is a full Vulcan. he may well have married Sybok's mother in his youth, and Amanda in his youngish-middle age.

agreed about the Pon Farr/conception point. who knows, mayhap nuTrek can and will answer some of those hitherto pesky and largely unanswered questions.

Grist for the mill. Just a hunch on where this is headed....

What do you want to bet, WHAT DO YOU WANT TO BET, T'Pring was off-world at the time of the movie and survived. I will bet you dimes, dollars, to doughnuts that T'Pring, instead of running off with Stonn (who is conveniently not around anymore,
because he was absorbed by the singularity
...), comes back into the picture in 12 to claim what is hers by Vulcan Law.

The script writes itself, you realize this don't you?

Instead of Kirk vs. Spock in Amok Time, we get T'Pring vs. Uhura in a female version of the Ponn Farr battle. I lay better than 50% odds that Orci and Kurtzman will do this.
 
"Vulcans gone wild?"

"Vulcan girls do it once every seven years?"

Hmm...makes me feel all tingly....
 
Lighting storm in space?

Reminds me of....

"Captains log...Stardate...two...four..sevensixpointfive!!...While passing through an energy cloud, I have begun...to notice...some peculiarites...in my crew's behavior...whilethefacesremainthesame!...their personalities...their...PERSONAAAAALITIESS...have. been. altered."

And my work here is done

Don't worry. I got it. Kevin Pollak's Star Trek is astounding.
 
Yes Pollak does Shatner justice...so unless the writers can shoehorn Shatner into another installment, I fear that the art of the Shatnerian impression may be lost...
 
It sort of breaks my heart to see some of the comments made about the movie already, by people who presumably haven't even seen it yet. As a fan who has loved Star Trek since he was a kid, religiously watching original series episodes every Saturday evening, this film is nothing short of a gift. A dying franchise on life support, that was bereft of newness and creativity has now been invested in heavily and given a new direction. They have made what appears to be a fantastic movie from what I have seen so far and read, about the original and my personal favorite crew. To me, this isn't just "good enough", this is wonderful, any Trek fan should be ecstatic.

It just seems to me that because the plot-lines or details of the movie don't meet certain people's preconceived notions of what a new Trek should be, or what should happen in the Trek "universe", that they refuse to have anything to do with it. To me this is the epitome of close-mindedness and the antithesis of what Trek is all about. I just feel badly that some people are already determined not to like it without even seeing it when this really should be a great time for all of us.
 
* Incidentally, does anyone have a clue as to what the population of Vulcan is, at this or any other time? Is it large? Are they not a numerous people? Has it ever been stated, generally or explicitly how many Vulcans there are at any given time?
I don't know, but I'm pretty sure that there are a lot of Vulcans living offworld, working on spaceships or living on some colonies.

I wouldn't even consider them to be an endangered species. Even if only around 50,000 of them would survive, it'll be more than enough to rebuild their civilization.

I mean, they're part of the Fedaration. These aren't the Colonials from nuBSG. They have friends and allies and many planets to go to. They'll be alright. Physically, at least.

I'm sure the population of Vulcan was logical for its size, climate, availability of food, and the make up of the (now extinct) flora and fauna. ;)

This whole idea of whether or not offing Vulcan was a good idea, bad idea, overkill (literally), or poignant and fitting for this movie is an interesting discussion in both story telling and Trek history. It'll probably become even more interesting after the movie comes out and the currently unspoiled chime in.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top