• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Although I have to mention the Enterprise Warps to Vulcan in a rather short amount of time - Around 10 minutes at "Maximum Warp"

oh wow. Now that's not a good thing imo.
I mean how can there be any feel of the vastness of space when planets are just minutes away?
I realize that similar stuff was on ENT (4 days to Kronos), Star Trek V and TOS "That which survives", but things like that shouldn't happen anymore. Not in a movie where you establish a new Star Trek.
10 minutes between planets is too little imo.

And also, what's that about Scotty beaming people to the moving Enterprise lightyears away? Won't we ask in future installments "Hey, why don't they just do this Scotty long-range beaming now?"
isn't that part of why the "old Trek" didn't work anymore.

I don't think it was a total of ten mins to Vulcan. but it's where that particular dialogue took place. I didn't take it to mean that the whole journey took ten mins.

as to long-range beaming: yes, that is exactly what it is all about. anything and everything is unpredictable now.
 
The reason that doesn't work for me either is if any of the next two movies deals once again with time travel/alternate reality... then that's just creative bankruptcy. They might as well just call the movies and the franchise TIME TREK.

In a universe where time travel is casually easy, one would *expect* all of the stories to be time travel stories.

Is there any reason Vulcan *shouldn't* be restored?

Yes, that's another one of the major problems I have... the time travel device has become way too easy and it's becoming a rather silly joke too. There are so many more stories to tell in the galaxy, can we please see a few of those as well?

Why not restore Vulcan? What's done is done. Vulcan is gone. I don't like it, but that's the decision the creators made. It's a cheap shot for sure, used in TREK many times in the past, but no cheaper or over used than: re-treading time travel; re-treading a revenge plot; re-treading an origins story; re-treading blowing up planets; re-treading putting earth in peril, with yet another universal destructive device by yet another mad man. There are so many more stories to tell in the galaxy, can we please see a few of those as well?
 
Perhaps this is an age thing, I don't know. And people PLEASE don't take this as a beligerent or confrontational post because I seriously don't mean it that way. But I'm genuinely confused as to how someone who professes to be a fan of TOS can possibly be okay with Vulcan being destroyed. It just boggles my mind. :wtf:

But as I said, it's probably (at least partially anyway) an age thing. I'm 48 and probably a lot older than most of you here. I was 5 when the TOS debuted, and I'm not 100% certain if I ever saw a first run episode in "real-time" or not, but I know I became a regular viewer of the syndicated reruns in the very early 70s and have been hooked ever since.

I was thinking about my childhood from that point on, about my friendships I formed and how ST played a role in that. Even into high school and college, I can remember how much ST affected my life. Yet at the sametime I wasn't overboard with it. I've never been to a convention (although I did go see Gene Rodenberry when he came to our campus back in 84) and I've never worn a uniform, or put on spock ears or whatever. I've always been a fan, but not a fanatic.
Hey, gh4chiefs, sounds like your experience mirrors my own almost exactly. And I agree with you. It's probably at least partly nostalgia. But to me it's also about artistic integrity; this cavalier, adolescent approach to a reboot is just thematically wrong for Trek. It's like bringing back Peanuts by Robert Crumb (could happen-- nothing would surprise me at this point :rommie:). There's no reason they couldn't have put all this effort into telling us the story of how the crew met and the story of their first mission together.

Personally, I think the Summer Blockbuster Star Wars approach is entirely wrong anyway; they should have taken the same route as Stargate and Futurama.
 
An epic is one big sprawling story with a big wide scope and enoromous setting.

"The Iliad" is an epic.

"Lawrence of Arabia" is an epic.

"Doctor Zhivago" is an epic.

"Star Wars" is an epic.

"Star Trek" is not an epic!

"Star Trek" is a collection of stories, some epic, some intimate, some deathly serious, some borderline slapstick.

And it is this fundamental misunderstanding of Star Trek, starting with the various pinheads who have held the position of chairman of Paramount Studios, that have resulted in Star Trek being so badly mishandled over the years, especially with regard to the movies, and their idiotic attempts to turn Star Trek into Star Wars.

Well, it looks like they've finally succeeded. Star Trek, at least as far as the movie side is concerned, has now been forced into the dumbed-down, explodapalooza mold that in previous years it managed to avoid.

Enjoy your new version of Star Trek. It won't last.
 
Although I have to mention the Enterprise Warps to Vulcan in a rather short amount of time - Around 10 minutes at "Maximum Warp"

oh wow. Now that's not a good thing imo.
I mean how can there be any feel of the vastness of space when planets are just minutes away?
I realize that similar stuff was on ENT (4 days to Kronos), Star Trek V and TOS "That which survives", but things like that shouldn't happen anymore. Not in a movie where you establish a new Star Trek.
10 minutes between planets is too little imo.

And also, what's that about Scotty beaming people to the moving Enterprise lightyears away? Won't we ask in future installments "Hey, why don't they just do this Scotty long-range beaming now?"
isn't that part of why the "old Trek" didn't work anymore.


Thinking Back (There was an awful lot to take in at the premiere and then 2 hour packed film :p) The fleet warps away, Enterprise is stopped by Sulu's unfamiliarity with the controls, THEN they go to warp. Then we cut to kirk, who is being treated by McCoy for the alien flu he gave Kirk to get him on the ship, and then he injects kirk with a sedative. We cut to Pike and Chekov giving the annoucement about Vulcan, during which Kirk comes too. I assumed this cut was immediate, but it could as easily be hours later. Kirk hears about the "Lightning Storm in Space" comment and then rushes to Uhura for confirmation, Then they all rush to the bridge where Chekov states they are 3 minutes away from Vulcan when Kirk is saying its a trap and they should stop.
 
Although I have to mention the Enterprise Warps to Vulcan in a rather short amount of time - Around 10 minutes at "Maximum Warp"

oh wow. Now that's not a good thing imo.
I mean how can there be any feel of the vastness of space when planets are just minutes away?
I realize that similar stuff was on ENT (4 days to Kronos), Star Trek V and TOS "That which survives", but things like that shouldn't happen anymore. Not in a movie where you establish a new Star Trek.
10 minutes between planets is too little imo.

And also, what's that about Scotty beaming people to the moving Enterprise lightyears away? Won't we ask in future installments "Hey, why don't they just do this Scotty long-range beaming now?"
isn't that part of why the "old Trek" didn't work anymore.

I don't think it was a total of ten mins to Vulcan. but it's where that particular dialogue took place. I didn't take it to mean that the whole journey took ten mins.

as to long-range beaming: yes, that is exactly what it is all about. anything and everything is unpredictable now.

Besides, there was that Enterprise episode where the inventor of the transporter had been testing it decades prior when he lost his son. Who is to say Scotty didnt perfect and enhance this technique in the prime universe?

Also its always nice to mention, Enterprise is the only series not affected by this movie. Everything that happened in Enterprise happened in this timeline. :D
 
Lighting storm in space?

Reminds me of....

"Captains log...Stardate...two...four..sevensixpointfive!!...While passing through an energy cloud, I have begun...to notice...some peculiarites...in my crew's behavior...whilethefacesremainthesame!...their personalities...their...PERSONAAAAALITIESS...have. been. altered."

And my work here is done
 
Star Trek XII (if it comes) will be interesting. We can't just judge this new take on Trek by this reboot alone. The movie obviously managed to make something great with the characters and at the same time delivered a story so fast paced and exciting that its shortcomings are easily overlooked. For a good reboot that's really all you can ask.

The next movie might be more about that new universe they are creating.
This isn't Star Trek 's TDK, it's Batman Begins.
 
An epic is one big sprawling story with a big wide scope and enoromous setting.

"The Iliad" is an epic.

"Lawrence of Arabia" is an epic.

"Doctor Zhivago" is an epic.

"Star Wars" is an epic.

"Star Trek" is not an epic!

"Star Trek" is a collection of stories, some epic, some intimate, some deathly serious, some borderline slapstick.

And it is this fundamental misunderstanding of Star Trek, starting with the various pinheads who have held the position of chairman of Paramount Studios, that have resulted in Star Trek being so badly mishandled over the years, especially with regard to the movies, and their idiotic attempts to turn Star Trek into Star Wars.

Well, it looks like they've finally succeeded. Star Trek, at least as far as the movie side is concerned, has now been forced into the dumbed-down, explodapalooza mold that in previous years it managed to avoid.

Enjoy your new version of Star Trek. It won't last.

I will enjoy it, and it will make shitloads of money, and then there will be sequels and you will be forced to deal with it for years to come.

Accenting the action portion of Trek, which has been there since day one, and using that in order to draw in a larger audience, is a smart decision, and according to almost EVERY review, the movie is still able to capture the adventurous spirit, and wonderful character interaction that mad TOS so great.

But of course I should know that you would NEVER give this movie a fair chance, since it isn't your fanboy vision of what the movie should be. Go cry in you TOS DVDs some more.
 
Lighting storm in space?

Reminds me of....

"Captains log...Stardate...two...four..sevensixpointfive!!...While passing through an energy cloud, I have begun...to notice...some peculiarites...in my crew's behavior...whilethefacesremainthesame!...their personalities...their...PERSONAAAAALITIESS...have. been. altered."

And my work here is done


Gah,

Random Science Officer: "It Looks like a lightning Storm in space"

Badass Robau: "Thats impossible."

Random Science Officer: "Sir theres a ship emerging from the anomaly!"

Badass Robau: "What?"

Thats how the exchange happens in the movie. Sorry for paraphrasing.

*loads shotgun*
 
Hey I just had a thought. For years back in the 1990's there was alot of debate as to wheather Vulcan circled 40 Eridani or Epsilon Eridani. Maybe BOTH sides of the arguement were right. Perhaps 40 Eri was the star for the original and Epsilon Eridani was the Star for the new homeworld of the Vulcans.
 
I hate to open a can of worms...but why is Vulcan so important? Its not as if the Vulcan RACE has been wiped out. They still exist as a species. An endangered species yes, but its not the be all end all of Vulcan society. In the context of the story, Vulcan was a big enough target on the characters to elicit a powerful emotional response, but in other stories set in this universe? What is the significance of the planet Vulcan that im missing out on?

Well again, I guess I can't keep a promise because I said wouldn't post anymore, but here I am.

Dac I just think it's either something you feel or you don't. I've said again and again that I don't understand the point of view that's it okay to blow it up, but I also recogonize, as you're pointing out, that you don't really understand why someone like me opposes it.

For me at least, it was just a part of the legend, the mythos, a part of the Star Trek universe that should not have been tampered with. I didn't get caught up in all the discussion about where the Enterprise was built, and so forth. But this discussion drew me in, because it seemed more important to the Trek universe and seemed a little more personal to me. But I readily recogonize I'm in a small minority of fans that feels that way.

Something Starship Polaris said made me rethink what I said about it being my age. That's probably a crutch. It's probably more about my personality and resistance to change. I was able to accept a lot of the changes to the ship, and I wasn't particularily caught up in the back story of the characters. So I can roll with the punches on that. But to think of a TOS Star Trek universe going forward where the planet Vulcan does not exist . . . I'm sorry but I just see that as just wrong.


A fair point indeed. Just like the look and feel of the ship has a resonance with me, I can understand how Vulcan would have the same impact.

However, what I want to make clear is that, Yes, while Vulcan is destroyed, it DOES have a lot of the screen time devoted to its destruction after the fact, its something which makes this universe what it is. The original trek universe still continues on which is part of the beauty of this remake. Its a remake without actually being one. Which means only the first minute or so takes place in the original series. The second the Narada pops into existence, the new universe is created and anything from that moment on is possible. Its Chaos Theory. One simple event starts a chain reaction from which anything is possible. Just so happens, Drama is born from stuff happening out of the ordinary, and Vulcan getting blown up - well, from the very passionate reaction generated by this thread, it evokes the right emotions the writers wanted. Grief and sorrow, but also hope in the face of evil. Life from the jaws of death. Something which Star Trek has prided itself upon for many many years. And in the death of Vulcan, Earth is saved which if you want to go all poetic about: Earth is the home of the federation, the new beacon of hope in the galaxy, whereas Vulcan is history symbolised in the fact that it has existed for so long. Its allegorical for the franchise. In the death of Star Trek, It is reborn into something different yet fundamentally the same. Which is what this movie is all about, and I cant help but hope the loss of Vulcan will ruin your enjoyment of what is essentially a brilliant movie.

Thanks for the thoughts Dac, I appreciate your insights. You've given me a lot to ponder.
 
Enjoy your new version of Star Trek.

Thanks, I will.

It won't last.
We'll see.

Ironically, if this crowd pleasing, reasonably intelligent rebirth succeeds, it will lead to a renaissance of Trek, with several sequels to come that be able to fit in more of what reflects your criteria of what Trek should be.

And CBS might just commission a new series in light of the success.

So even if the movie is flawed in your opinion, the vistas it opens up are...

epic.
 
I don't have a problem with the writers destroying Vulcan in this movie. Not in the slightest. It's simply a different and new version of the Trek story, and the first version still exists.

You know what bothers me about the changing world, at my age? The decline of the American automobile industry bothers me greatly. It's not a political thing - it was just a cornerstone feature of the world I grew up in as I experienced it, and what's happening now is much more real than Star Trek.

Well said...I myself have watched the show from the beginning and to be honest this incarnation/version/movie doesn't bother me, if it breathes new life into a franchise torn by general ridicule, an inconsistent continuity and a divisive fanbase, it's fine by me. I have to chuckle with all the hate and discontent over a movie based on a show whose philosophy includes "Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations". Me I accept the diversity....:vulcan:

As far as the US automobile industry, it's a sad state of affairs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Enjoy your new version of Star Trek. It won't last.

Nothing does. But then, there will be another version. :techman:

The one you insist upon is done.

Which is fine, because I can still enjoy it as often as I want. :)

But, I suppose "it won't last" is as good a backpedal as any away from the discredited "these guys don't have a clue what they're doing." :lol:
 
Random Science Officer: "It Looks like a lightning Storm in space"

Badass Robau: "Thats impossible."

Random Science Officer: "Sir theres a ship emerging from the anomaly!"

Badass Robau: "What?"

Thats how the exchange happens in the movie. Sorry for paraphrasing.

*loads shotgun*
Robau actually loads his shotgun when he sees the Narada? YEA!!!
 
"Star Trek" is not an epic!

Clarification: Star Trek "isn't" whatever this movie is in your world. What's funny is you don't know what this Star Trek is or isn't.

and their idiotic attempts to turn Star Trek into Star Wars.

Yes, how many times did that happen?

Well, it looks like they've finally succeeded. Star Trek, at least as far as the movie side is concerned, has now been forced into the dumbed-down, explodapalooza mold that in previous years it managed to avoid.

So you start off saying that they've tried to make Star Trek into Star Wars in the past, now you turn around and say they've tried to avoid making it similar. Gotcha.

Enjoy your new version of Star Trek. It won't last.

Just like your old version of Star Trek. :techman:
 
Random Science Officer: "It Looks like a lightning Storm in space"

Badass Robau: "Thats impossible."

Random Science Officer: "Sir theres a ship emerging from the anomaly!"

Badass Robau: "What?"

Thats how the exchange happens in the movie. Sorry for paraphrasing.

*loads shotgun*
Robau actually loads his shotgun when he sees the Narada? YEA!!!

:lol:
 
An epic is one big sprawling story with a big wide scope and enoromous setting.

"The Iliad" is an epic.

"Lawrence of Arabia" is an epic.

"Doctor Zhivago" is an epic.

"Star Wars" is an epic.

"Star Trek" is not an epic!

"Star Trek" is a collection of stories, some epic, some intimate, some deathly serious, some borderline slapstick.

And it is this fundamental misunderstanding of Star Trek, starting with the various pinheads who have held the position of chairman of Paramount Studios, that have resulted in Star Trek being so badly mishandled over the years, especially with regard to the movies, and their idiotic attempts to turn Star Trek into Star Wars.

Well, it looks like they've finally succeeded. Star Trek, at least as far as the movie side is concerned, has now been forced into the dumbed-down, explodapalooza mold that in previous years it managed to avoid.

Enjoy your new version of Star Trek. It won't last.


Awww QQ...

Somebody needs a hug! ;)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top