For its purpose its not bad, but there is no way its going to replace godzilla.
Wrath of Kahn was so much cheaper than The Motion Picture, and I know which was the better film.
And found it to be emotionally poor, story poor and pointless.
Its not a bad b grade movie.
Luckily Star trek is made 6 times the budget.
Wrath of Kahn was so much cheaper than The Motion Picture, and I know which was the better film.
I actually disagree with that. TMP was a much better Sci-fi film, but WOK was better Space Opera.
I do know that, but I know nothing about Abrams and he talks alot about this (a lot of the star trek Q and A's were in link with cloverfield.) and i needed another dvd to watch...Just to be clear; you are aware Abrams did not direct this, correct? And you are aware the writers for Trek were not involved, correct?
^Does your use of the preterit imply you no longer like it?
![]()
There was no need of an explanation as to why the monster was too strong, it's a movie about an alien coming to earth and wreaking havoc, and we're suck with some twenty-somethings trying to save their own skin. The point is, they've got to get the fuck away and don't give a rats ass as to why nothing is working.
IMO I think the exploding victim was because that's what the smaller monsters do, they may not have a lot of attack, but give it 20 minutes and you're sure going to be fucking feeling it.
Wrath of Kahn was so much cheaper than The Motion Picture, and I know which was the better film.
I actually disagree with that. TMP was a much better Sci-fi film, but WOK was better Space Opera.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.