• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Grading MATT DECKER...

Rate MATT DECKER

  • A+ right up there with the best. Sure, a hard ass, but a great captain

    Votes: 13 52.0%
  • B: mmmmmm...seemed a bit narrow minded in his approach

    Votes: 8 32.0%
  • C: the crew would have been split 50/50 on whether he was a good captain or not

    Votes: 3 12.0%
  • Mutiny on the Bounty!!!

    Votes: 1 4.0%

  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .
As such, the best course of action would have been for Decker to power down the Constellation and wait for sufficient distance from the DDM to then power up and get out of there. Clearly one starship on its own was no match for it.

It was totally senseless for Decker to beam his crew down to a nearby planet. The DDM was in the business of chopping up all planets within range, so surely being on any planet in that area is a death sentence. Matt stayed behind to "go down with the ship", not to try anything else against the DDM... remember when Kirk was the last member aboard the Enterprise in "This Side of Paradise"? He distinctly stated that one person can't run the ship. Decker couldn't have done anything... certainly not without any help. If he was destined to die, he should have recruited a volunteer and then the two of them could have maneuvered the ship into the DDM and perform a self-destruct. Why just die without making a last ditch effort to destroy the thing?
In essence, this. (Neutronium hull, btw. ;))

I do wonder if the whole idea of having Decker's entire crew die was really just an easy way of reducing the cost of shooting the episode (less background actors to manage). If I were to rewrite the episode, I'd have it where most of the crew perished due to environmental failures aboard the ship... and we'd see some of them revived by McCoy, in addition to Decker's rescue. Then Decker wouldn't have been made to look like such a fool for sending his entire crew to a senseless death. He still could have a screw loose and do what he did aboard the Enterprise, thinking a fresh bank of phasers might do the trick... even though Spock reminded him that the hull couldn't be pierced by them. It is interesting that there was no mention of trying photon torpedoes. Weren't they already put to use in earlier episodes?
I think having the crew be dead might have been an added budget bonus, but I think overall having them all die was to make him uber-Ahab. Having some survivors may have indeed made for a more dramatic scenario, and I don't know about photorps. Given the thing's size, as you point out, they might have been rather inaffective.
 
There were some gaping holes in this episode, some as wide as the maw of that DDM. ;)

First, the DDM was designed as a planet destroyer, digesting the leftover planet rubble as its fuel. A starship is a significantly small item in comparison to a planet. For the device to navigate and "swallow" a starship would probably be more effort than it is worth.

We don't really know what the DDM was designed to do. All we have is Kirk's frankly rather far-fetched guesswork. If the machine really was a berserker designed to erase civilizations, then it would make eminent sense to attack starships in addition to planets...

Second, the DDM is designed to defend itself. If a starship attacks, it will attack back until it no longer measures any power levels posing a threat. As such, the best course of action would have been for Decker to power down the Constellation and wait for sufficient distance from the DDM to then power up and get out of there.

Many a submarine movie, a cloakship Trek episode, and recently also Matrix, reiterates this theme: going quiet is a good idea if you can do it fast enough, but it costs you your life if the enemy has already seen you and behaves against expectations. I doubt Decker would have been ready to disarm his ship when the enemy bore down on him: it would call not only for nerves of duranium, but also for extremely reliable intelligence on how the enemy behaves. Decker probably didn't have the latter...

Logically the only way to do anything to the DDM is by sending a bomb down its intake port, whether its a thermonuclear warhead or a matter-antimatter device.

Even when said intake port consumes incoming matter, including planets, with ease? The maw might have been the most impenetrable part of the beast for all Decker and Kirk knew, until further analysis. It sure was worth a try, but it was also one of the riskiest maneuvers Decker or Kirk could attempt - the enemy might have been vulnerable there, but it was also deadly there, and harmless from any other angle!

Remember when Kirk was the last member aboard the Enterprise in "This Side of Paradise"? He distinctly stated that one person can't run the ship.

Running the ship, and piloting the ship to a suicide dive, are completely different things. I'm convinced I could navigate CVN-65 to a catastrophic collision with a San Diego pier with zero training if I were handed that ship all powered up and pointed in the right direction. I sure as hell couldn't get the ship going if she were idled and moored on said pier.

There must be a continuum of things one can do with a starship, from a single-person kamikaze run, to a five-person interstellar hop, to a fifty-person refueling, to a hundred-person combat sortie, to a 300-person prolonged combat sortie that involves repairs, reloading and casualty replacement.

It is interesting that there was no mention of trying photon torpedoes. Weren't they already put to use in earlier episodes?

Yeah, torps were first season stuff, and this was from the early second.

Yet Washburn reported that "somehow the antimatter in the warp drive pods [of the Constellation] has been deactivated". Supposedly, this would preclude torpedo use if it happened to the Enterprise, too.

The DDM then proceeds to hit the Enterprise while her shields are down. Warp drive becomes useless at that point. We might thus speculate that the hit involved this nasty antimatter-deactivation effect, rendering the torpedoes useless.

Timo Saloniemi
 
People also tend to forget that the Constellation went in with ZERO intel and information on the PK. The Enterprise, for her part, got everything that Decker knew, including the Constellation's disabling. Many people here are demanding the Decker knew as much as the audience, which is hardly a fair measure of the character.

This isn't the first time. With the Interprid, the Enterprise survives because they knew the Intrepid's fate. With the Exeter, the Enterprise knew HER fate. The idea is 'can we avoid winding up like THEM somehow', and they do it armed with more knowledge.
 
OTOH, we do know that Decker, too, followed a trail of utterly destroyed star systems. He had the same intel as Kirk or Spock did. And later, Spock was able to determine the invulnerability of the DDM's neutronium shell quite without input from Decker, suggesting there was no real tactical advantage to be gained from Decker's fateful trailblazing.

Nor does it seem that intel from the Intrepid would have played much of a role in "Immunity Syndrome". Rather, the heroes at one point comment that they really are in no different a position from the ill-fated Vulcans, in terms of hardware or knowledge or odds of success.

Timo Saloniemi
 
OTOH, we do know that Decker, too, followed a trail of utterly destroyed star systems. He had the same intel as Kirk or Spock did. And later, Spock was able to determine the invulnerability of the DDM's neutronium shell quite without input from Decker, suggesting there was no real tactical advantage to be gained from Decker's fateful trailblazing.

Exactly my point.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top