We could call them "snotty little newbie shit heads" and just save any confusion..
Any wanker who decides to call themselves a Trek fan just because they like this movie will be considered a poser by me. And I consider posers to be less than human.
Come on, mate, don't be such a harsh judge.
Give the nippers a chance. Take them under your wings, share your vast knowledge with them, be their mentor. They might turn out all right!
You might be onto something there. My knowledge of what Trek truly is and what it should be is vast and unquestionable. I do have much to teach them. But I would decide when they can call themselves a fan, and it will be well after they've seen more than this movie.
Besides, thanks to a gross oversight by Abrams and Cohorts, anyone introduced to Trek via this movie won't know who Dr. M'Benga is. I don't see how anyone can call themselves a Trek fan without knowing who Dr. M'Benga is.
Your modesty is your most endearing trait...
Your modesty is your most endearing trait...
That's what the many squillion of girls I score with say.
Also, did I mention I have quite the imagination?
BTW, the "neo-trekker" nomenclature = mega dumb. the last thing you want to do is exclude people who want to be trekkies. the irony is a little too rich.
I dont know, I seem to remember things such as TNGers, Niners, Voyagers, etcHmmm...What was that name we gave to all those new Star Trek fans that came on board after 1987 because of TNG?
I remember now -- Star Trek fans.
If this does happen, I insist that we refer to these people as 'Neo-Trekkers' - just to differentiate them from older fans.
Yes. After all, what's a little more division amongst Trek fans?![]()
Any wanker who decides to call themselves a Trek fan just because they like this movie will be considered a poser by me. And I consider posers to be less than human.
Come on, mate, don't be such a harsh judge.
Give the nippers a chance. Take them under your wings, share your vast knowledge with them, be their mentor. They might turn out all right!
Our ultimate goal should be drawing them deeper into the fold, not pushing them out.
Any wanker who decides to call themselves a Trek fan just because they like this movie will be considered a poser by me. And I consider posers to be less than human.
But then again, all of them are Star Trek fans. All of these names just express a particular affectation for one of the series. Neo-Trekkers implies that they aren't legit Trek fans at all. At least the term sounds that way to me.I dont know, I seem to remember things such as TNGers, Niners, Voyagers, etcHmmm...What was that name we gave to all those new Star Trek fans that came on board after 1987 because of TNG?
I remember now -- Star Trek fans.![]()
Oh, and you forgot about the NX-01ers.![]()
It strikes me that TNGers, Niners, Voyagers and the like are all labels by which people tend to self-identify, perhaps because [that show] was the one which was in original run when they first started getting into Trek. By contrast, the proposed "Neo-Trekkers" would be a label applied to one group by members of another, as a way of establishing that "those people are different from us" and emphasizing separation rather than inclusion. Seems a little unfriendly and unwelcoming, doesn't it?But then again, all of them are Star Trek fans. All of these names just express a particular affectation for one of the series. Neo-Trekkers implies that they aren't legit Trek fans at all. At least the term sounds that way to me.I dont know, I seem to remember things such as TNGers, Niners, Voyagers, etcHmmm...What was that name we gave to all those new Star Trek fans that came on board after 1987 because of TNG?
I remember now -- Star Trek fans.![]()
Pfft, we don't have to count them, do we?Oh, and you forgot about the NX-01ers.![]()
I would really like to know what we TOS fans are called...
TOSsers?![]()
nix-ons (stress on second syllable).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.