That's it? From all the fuss I thought the guy ran over a little girl or something.
That seemed to be the majority of the country's reaction too. But the tabloids kept trying to stir it up, and it dominated the news for ages, when basically any sane person couldn't give a shit about it.
Always be wary of thinking you know what 'the majority' or 'any sane person' would think about things, when none of us really know any more than what a fe dozen friends and relatives think.
Personally, I thought that when Ross'n'Brand started going into belly laughs about how Andrew Sachs might be so upset he'd kill himself, and the stuff about how they ought to break into his house to wipe the answerphone tape to avoid that, and if it turned out Sachs was already there, then they could try shagging him too and see if it made him any happier, was so far over the line that I couldn't understand anyone thinking it was funny - and whereas I'd defend bad taste to the hilt when Chris Morris does it on somethign like Brass Eye, this just seemed pointlessly nasty.
But equally, I don't listen to the show, and I'd never have heard about this if it hadn't been all over the papers. So you can pay your money and takes your choice as to whether it was unacceptable, or just stuff Brand's audience would expect and which nobody else would have heard about if the Daily Mail hadn't needed something to get angry about that week.
Or even both.
Anyway, regardless of whether 'Sachsgate' deserved to be such a big fuss, it's had a lot of lasting effects on British radio - the other chap involved, Jonathan Ross, had his two main series (the BBC's main movie review programme, Film 2009, and his big end of week chat show) taken off air for three months; the controller of the radio station it was all on, which is the highest rating one in the UK, took responsibility and resigned; and there's a bunch of new rules been brought in to avoid the situation that had apparently developed on the Brand show (basically, that the show was made for the BBC by his company, so the producer who was supposed to say no to the star if he went too far was also working for the star, who could sack him...).
And we now return you to discussion of whether he'd be any good in Pirates IV, and I'll stick with 'Who'd pay attention to the knock-off with the real thing in the same movie?'