• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done differently?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Since I loath Enterprise I might as well put my very first post here.

1. Change the name of the ship. I could just leave this at "It wasn't on the Wall in ST:TMP", but there's more to it. To me, naming the ship "Enterprise" was nothing more than an attempt for Berman and crew to mold Star Trek into what they thought 'their' idea of Star Trek was. Granted, there have been some great stories thanks to our man Rick, but the Star Trek universe shouldn't revolve around the name "Enterprise" like this series does. The scope of names should be bigger than that.

2. Sorry if you find this silly, but I would like to have a female majority for once. Ya, it's a long shot. Sue me.

3. No phase pistols. I don't really know what a good substitute for this would be, but for being 100 years before Kirk, it's just too soon to have hand held phasers like weapons.

4. No view screen. This is a little detail I thought was interesting from "Balance of Terror" where during the Earth/Romulan war there was no ship-to-ship visual communication where no vessel could see each other. Since the view screen is such a pinnacle aspect to the story telling of some series, I thought having no view screen at all would present some interesting ideas. I think the new Battlestar Galactica did a good job with this, so it's not impossible.

5. Phaser use being VERY limited. I'm not against phasers, but I like the earlier posts involving atomic phasers and how primitive that would sound and look on a Star Trek ship. I would have the ship's phasers take up so much power that half the ship's systems would have to be taken off line, including propulsion. And they can only fire it two to three times or else risk a power core burnout. Just something to that effect.

6. If anyone is going to be captured, they're gone for at least half a season. No exceptions. I do not accept a quick 'one episode" resolve no matter how convenient the writers may write them.

7. No reset switch. If you're going to write an episode, it must matter in the long run. Sure that sounds hard, but it's easy to skip a lot of episodes from previous shows and not miss anything relevant. If you're going to kill the captain, the captain remains dead. Actor contracts be danged.

8. If we haven't made contact with a species post this era, we're not going to see the species. No Borg and no Ferengi.

9. When you're serving on board a ship and manning a post, you wear a freaking uniform. No skin tight suits. If your qualified to work a ship, you're going to be represented as such.

10. And I cannot stress this enough. We ARE going to have an appropriate opening intro to the show, dangit! Some handsome guy singing about faith is a Star Trek mood killer!

Good first post, Jeyl. I quite agree with your thoughts, and in particular the first five.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

#3 hurt the show intensely.

Phase pistols. Meh.

In the earlier Diane Carey novel about Kirks dad, they used a gun called a hand cannon, which from description was like an old fashioned breech loading sawn off shotgun, you fired off one "round" which was a devastating energy blast that nothing was likely be able to avoid or have a defense against, then your cracked open the barrel took out the used shell and put in a new one. I was thinking while reading how "sure" were they in the shear death blow of this single serving killery that they would give up the security of continuous fire you get form a machine gun?
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

I would go with BSG semi reboot concept, hire Manny Coto. I however did like the Enterprise cast(specially Jolene.) with exception of Scott Bakula I would have used Enterprise XCV 330 design as inspiration instead of Akira class for the new Enterprise.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

I would have set the whole thing during the Romulan war.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Wouldn't have worked. From what we know of the Romulan War it wouldn't have been very impressive to see on screen, especially after the FX bonanza that was the Dominion War.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Yes, because if RDM's BSG has proven anything, it's that FX without phasers and photon torpedoes is boring... :shifty:
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

It would have seemed repetitive from DS9 either way, and from what I understand of TPTB behind 'Enterprise' it probably would have been almost verbatim.

I would have settled for a miniseries or even a finale movie about it.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

If ti would have been repetitive, than it would have been the fault of the people making it, but the concept itself isn't flawed. As n=much as I like DS9, it had a major flaw when it came to the war arc anyway - they did far too much telling instead of showing.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Agreed, I guess I'm just betting on the consistency of TPTB.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Yes, because if RDM's BSG has proven anything, it's that FX without phasers and photon torpedoes is boring... :shifty:

The capital ship fights ARE boring in Battlestar. Battlestar works as entertainment in battles because they have fighters, which Trek doesn't and never did.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

All of the capital ship fights I've seen on that show have been awesome.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Well, I think they're boring and wouldn't work if they were the main focus of the space battles. But they aren't, the fighter battles are and those fighters are small, quick and maneuverable in the way Romulan War-era battles wouldn't be.

Of course, this is all without taking into consideration that the Romulan War would use "atomic" weapons and floating bricks for ships which would make it even MORE boring.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Surely the excitement level of a space battle is due to how it is written and directed? A low tech (in Star Trek terms) battle might not feature violent manoeuvres and flashy special effects, but if well planned out it could be just as tense. Think more Hunt For Red October, and less Star Wars.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

I have, and all I see is two blockish spaceships in space that barely move when one fires a rocket at the other. We see an interior shot of the crew all sweaty and tense thinking of various ways out of it, and when we return to the outside it's the same shot as before only with the blocks having moved a few inches while the rocket is slowly inching towards the other block.

The "submarines" comparison has never made sense to me since Trek fighting has shown it to be more like dogfighting in the air and not the water. Only in the Romulan War case it would be watching two Zepplins fight each other, IE boring as Hell.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

lebowskiopinion.jpg
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

...Which also happens to fit better with what we know about that era in Trek than any of the "battles in the Romulan War would be cool!" stuff we hear.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Except the ships in ENT didn't move like bricks or submarines.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

No, it's just your opinion that battles like the kind shown in BSG are boring.
 
Re: If you were the creator of ENT, what would you have done different

Except the ships in ENT didn't move like bricks or submarines.

Yeah, because they realized that if they had stuck to what Spock said in "Balance of Terror" the show would've been too constrained and crippled to last one episode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top