As I've said repeatedly if you argue with me, I'll argue with you. If you stop, I'll stop. I will NOT be told to just wait and see without speaking my mind. Plain and simple.
So you'll only stop writing about Janeway if we stop writing about Janeway first?

If Janeway's your only character of interest in all of ST, you must have hit many bbs threads in your time that were totally irrelevant to your case.
Oh and you're doing and awfully good job ignoring the very real fact that Janeway fans like me won't be picking up a Star Trek book in 5-6 years just because Pocket Books by some miracle suddenly decides that they want us back as customers at that time.
I am a Janeway fan, and I am an appreciator, collector and reader of the Pocket Books licensed ST books. I put my faith in the authors and editors to deliver compelling interesting stories, and they deliver that in spades. I'm not going to demand that they start providing me only with happy endings, where all characters' growth and change is ritually reverted back to the status quo within one or two story instalments. We had that time (and particularly enforced in 1989-early 2000s), and it faded out after the ST Office was closed at Paramount.
Pocket's team has chosen to kill off a main character, and to keep them dead, perhaps for longer than we've been used to. Pocket has also elected to keep Data dead. For now. And to resurrect Trip. And Kirk. They've given themselves an "out" with Janeway, in case another story concept comes along to restore that character to life in an interesting way. We've seen how the Voyager crew work with Janeway. Now, maybe for just a while, some of us will live through the crew's collective grief. Interesting to many, abhorant to a few.
One day,
maybe we we least expect it, Janeway will return from the Q. Or maybe there'll be an amazing hardcover novel featuring Janeway's new experiences with the Q Continuum?
I'm not going to blackmail Pocket Books and announce that I'm withholding my money until they do
my bidding. I trust them, based on their amazing track record since 1979, to continue delivering mostly-excellent ST literature. That includes stories with shock endings, mixed with happy endings.
My favourite "New Frontier" character was Ensign Janos. What PAD did with that character essentially killed off Janos but, had he just been written out, or promoted to Admiral, to appease Janos fans, I'd never have been able to read that wonderful tearjerker of a bittersweet ending in "Stone and Anvil". Had PAD taken note of his Internet fanbase, maybe Janos would still be a lowly security guard. Ho hum. Instead, we got the amazing "Stone and Anvil", and the rest of the characters continue their journeys. I trusted in Peter David, and he delivered.
In fact, then he delivered stubborn ol' Admiral Janeway a most ironic death at the hands of the Borg. While many disliked how it was done, or why it was done, it was also controversial. And controversy certainly sells books. I have a feeling "Full Circle" is gonna be a ST blockbuster. We probably haven't had one of those for the VOY line since... "Mosaic".
This is where the argument is and so therefore this is where I am as well.
Caveat emptor. You may well run into many more arguments you find patronizing. You already know this for a fact.
I'm not really all that sensitive about her death. I have a choice there and that's to not buy the books, which is exactly what I'll do. I can live with that. What I AM sensitive about are the 'just wait...' remarks over here. I'll stop when you stop saying things like that so it's really up to you guys.
Then have some faith in the stories, and the authors. And if you've never had faith, don't expect it to suddenly change.
You're assuming that I'll be wanting to read about all those other characters. They've cannibalised my favourite show and killed of my favourite character. I don't think I'll be worrying about the other series.
Then you'd do better writing pen-and-paper complaints to Simon & Schuster, and organising a campaign that Pocket might notice. Not just bitchin' on a bbs.