• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Beverly vs. Katherine

I prefer...

  • Crusher

    Votes: 77 68.1%
  • Pulaski

    Votes: 26 23.0%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 10 8.8%

  • Total voters
    113
Definitely Pulaski! She was a real character whereas Crusher felt like a faceless cypher most of the time.

Actually this questions comes up here quite often. There are a great deal of Pulaski fans in this forum. I hope they'll make themselves heard in your poll. :)
 
I had to go Undecided. While I like Dr. Crusher, I think Pulaski had lots of potential that would have been realized if she'd stayed.
 
I voted Dr.Crusher. Its easy to just dismiss Dr. Crusher as not having as much personality as Pulaski but I think the mutual yet repressed attraction and close relationship between Dr. Crusher and Captain Picard added alot to the show that would have been lost if Dr. Pulaski was there the whole time instead of Dr. Crusher.
 
I agree with Falcor5.

However, back in the day I really wanted to dislike Pulaski, but she made that pretty hard. I liked her too. She was definitely different than Beverly.
 
I went with Bev....not because of any great acting talent, but I somehow thought that eventually Picard/Beverly would had a sex scene. Unfortunately they seemed to write Picard as either 'sexless' or gender 'unaware'...but back in the day, I actually thought Gates McFadden was pretty hot...

So I had to compare in my mind: A love scene between Picard and Bev (with some nice shots of Bev...oh yeah) or, who knows, they have might have had a love scene between Picard and Pulaski and the thought of having to endure that possible sex scene is enough to make me throw up...

so...Bev for the possible but never fullfilled lust for seeing her and Picard "as one".

Rob
 
Pulaski. Every scene with Crusher is sapped of any energy and emotion. Gates McFadden is IMO so wooden and shows nothing in any of her performances. However, if any Crusher fans can point me to any of her best moments, I'll give them another look.

Diana Muldaur is a superior actress and has the poise, voice, and Trek history to keep me interested in her. Muldaur is one of my favorite TV actresses, especially during the late 60s-early 70s period. Love her.:techman:
 
Pulaski. Every scene with Crusher is sapped of any energy and emotion. Gates McFadden is IMO so wooden and shows nothing in any of her performances. However, if any Crusher fans can point me to any of her best moments, I'll give them another look.

Diana Muldaur is a superior actress and has the poise, voice, and Trek history to keep me interested in her. Muldaur is one of my favorite TV actresses, especially during the late 60s-early 70s period. Love her.:techman:

Yeah...but who would you rather see naked? thats what my choice came down too, not acting ability. Thats why Patrick was there, to act...Bev was set up as a potential love interest. And thats why I liked Bev...Gates is sexier than Diana (though, in her prime, Diana was hot)

And if you dont think sex appeal dictates casting, I give you proof #2 and proof #3...Denise Crosby and Mirina Sirtis...

Rob
 
Pulaski. Every scene with Crusher is sapped of any energy and emotion. Gates McFadden is IMO so wooden and shows nothing in any of her performances. However, if any Crusher fans can point me to any of her best moments, I'll give them another look.

Diana Muldaur is a superior actress and has the poise, voice, and Trek history to keep me interested in her. Muldaur is one of my favorite TV actresses, especially during the late 60s-early 70s period. Love her.:techman:

Yeah...but who would you rather see naked? thats what my choice came down too, not acting ability. Thats why Patrick was there, to act...Bev was set up as a potential love interest. And thats why I liked Bev...Gates is sexier than Diana (though, in her prime, Diana was hot)

And if you dont think sex appeal dictates casting, I give you proof #2 and proof #3...Denise Crosby and Mirina Sirtis...

Rob

I love Muldaur in her prime but that's not how I made my choice.

Yes, sex appeal does dictate casting, but they must have made an exception in McFadden's case--she radiates nada-- at least for me-- but if others like her, then go to it, boys! :lol:
 
Pulaski. Every scene with Crusher is sapped of any energy and emotion. Gates McFadden is IMO so wooden and shows nothing in any of her performances. However, if any Crusher fans can point me to any of her best moments, I'll give them another look.

Diana Muldaur is a superior actress and has the poise, voice, and Trek history to keep me interested in her. Muldaur is one of my favorite TV actresses, especially during the late 60s-early 70s period. Love her.:techman:

Yeah...but who would you rather see naked? thats what my choice came down too, not acting ability. Thats why Patrick was there, to act...Bev was set up as a potential love interest. And thats why I liked Bev...Gates is sexier than Diana (though, in her prime, Diana was hot)

And if you dont think sex appeal dictates casting, I give you proof #2 and proof #3...Denise Crosby and Mirina Sirtis...

Rob

I love Muldaur in her prime but that's not how I made my choice.

Yes, sex appeal does dictate casting, but they must have made an exception in McFadden's case--she radiates nada at least for me, but if others like her, then go to it, boys! :lol:

to be honest, I am glad Diana didn't stay. She went on to a better gig on LA LAW. The writing for TNG had yet to prove to be anything other than light-weight fare in TNG's 1-2 season.

My favorite performance of Mudlaur's was as Steve Mcgarretts ex-lover in Hawaii Five-0. And let me state, pure and simple, she could act circles around any, and I mean ANY, Trek actress....she was that good IMO.

Rob
 
Pulaski was great! :techman:
I loved her interactions with Worf (the tea ceremony) and her mispronounciation of Data :D
and in general her 'getting used to' Data . . . like she didn't hate androids, but didn't really know what to make of Data
 
Pulaski is a far more interesting character than bland Beverly, but I'm not sure she fitted the TNG ethos as well - she was more like a female McCoy. Nevertheless, I've gone for her.
 
I voted undecided because I like both characters.

Unfortunately they seemed to write Picard as either 'sexless' or gender 'unaware'...

:wtf: What?
Patrick Stewart was voted Most Bodacious male on TV in 1993 by the readers of TV Guide.


kiss02.jpg



And Picard sure doesn't seem sexless or gender unaware in these screencaps. ;)

Warmest Wishes,
Whoa Nellie
 
Picard proved that fairly short bald men could be REALLY sexy. It's mostly the voice, of course, but not entirely.
 
Woah Nellie, you totally have the code for those 'caps on permenant standby lest PS's studliness or horndoggery be called into question, right? :lol:

I think Crusher got shafted by the writers almost as badly as Geordi for most of Next Gen, but she was always my favourite character. I'd love to have seen at least one episode with both of them in it though, preferably ganging up on Picard.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top