Post not poster dude. If you keep getting personal you're likely to end up with an infraction at some point.My quote still stands though, you didn't read it on the other BBS so I'll let that stand as your legacy. You can't deny it.
Uh huh. Well since I actually took the time to read the entire review, as opposed to simply quoting certain bits out of context to give a false impression, I think I can quite easily dismiss that particular statement. But really, whatever makes you sleep at night. *shrug*My quote still stands though, you didn't read it on the other BBS so I'll let that stand as your legacy. You can't deny it.
Not a clue. I was pretty impressed when I saw the finished scene.Did you even know how gory it was going to be when they filmed you or did they just tell you to wiggle around on the floor?
Post not poster dude. If you keep getting personal you're likely to end up with an infraction at some point.My quote still stands though, you didn't read it on the other BBS so I'll let that stand as your legacy. You can't deny it.
Thanks Middy.
Just noticed you're in San Diego. My wife and I were there just a couple of months back. Beautiful city.
From Trek Today BBS..read the last sentence..
TrekMovie.com reports that Star Trek: Phase II has released a new episode, Blood and Fire, Part 1. TrekMovie reviewed the episode, and they found that "'Blood and Fire' is another good entry from the Phase II team...."
Doesn't sound like a good one to me, says only the teaser was the best part..apparently you only read what you want and close your eyes to the other parts.
I found the teaser tedious. Yet another fan film with ships shooting each other and the camera shaking, and ships getting holes blown in each other. That was exciting when it was new like back in TWOK, but its been done to death. Um, STORY, guys.
I found the teaser tedious. Yet another fan film with ships shooting each other and the camera shaking, and ships getting holes blown in each other. That was exciting when it was new like back in TWOK, but its been done to death. Um, STORY, guys.
Story? In the teaser? I think one puts most of the story in the four acts that follow the teaser--and that the teaser should primarily tease and only secondarily offer some narrative. I don't subscribe to your false dichotomy. I think we did indeed tease first and offer a bit of narrative second, in order to get the story started. We opened with Ensign Peter Kirk being put in harm's way, setting the stage for a story about Captain Kirk's relationship with Peter and the Captain's ambivalence about having Peter on board.
It was indeed exciting when it was "new like in TWOK." But judging by the feedback we're getting, it's still pretty damn exciting to our viewers. I'm sorry you found the teaser tedious. For many, it seems to be the highlight of the episode. But then, not every viewer is as discriminating as you might be. It's hard to be all things to all viewers.
Greg Schnitzer
Co-Executive Producer
Star Trek Phase II
My only critique is that NV/PII has, in the last four episodes going all the way back to "In Harm's Way," hooked viewers with some sort of battle/phaser fight.... I would like other types of teasers to be explored in later episodes, and they probably will judging by what's in the pipeline ("The Child" and "Kitumba").
Nevertheless, the battle was thrilling to watch because of the effects
One review doesn't sum an episode up. I read the reviews but then I watch it and make my own mind up. After all, a review is still only one person's opinion, whoever and wherever it is.My quote still stands though, you didn't read it on the other BBS so I'll let that stand as your legacy. You can't deny it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.