I have this weird feeling the new one won't have the sort of satrical comical take that Stallone's film had
Eh? The whole point of
Dredd is that it's satire. It's a conglomeration of sci-fi tropes (and others, like
Dirty Harry) thrown together in utterly over-the-top fashion, what else could it be than a comedy? They don't expect us to take it seriously, do they?
Maybe I've sold Stallone short here. I should check out his version. I got the impression it sucked precisely because he didn't realize it was supposed to be satirical and he played it straight.
Anyway, my vote for Dredd is Vin Diesel. He's already more of a comic book character than a human being, and he can do comedy (as well as being a better actor than most folks realize). What we don't want is any "normal" type action hero. This is the role that Diesel was born to play; he's had way too many movies that just weren't right for him (silly kiddie comedies for example). Diesel is perfect for an action-hero who is the most insane, absurd example of the type.
The Stallone film just kind of threw that arty farty cynicism out the window and satirized the hell out of it.
I never got the impression from the comics that there was any "arty farty cynicism" about it. It's always struck me as more of a gleeful wallow in how flat-out fun it is to take sci-fi, the revenge-cop genre, even Westerns, and mash them all together.
If there's anything finger-wagging or nannyish about
Judge Dredd, I sure as shit missed it. That sort of thing would have killed all the fun dead, dead, dead, and then what's the point?
Dredd is all about wish fulfillment fantasy and cultural tropes, nothing real about it at all. How can you "critique" the unreal? Which is there to critique precisely because it is popular, so what does that say about the people who like it, eg, all of us except for the stick-up-the-ass types?
Screw the stick-up-the-ass types. I sure hope this new bunch isn't that, because they'll fuck this up for sure and create another misfired abortion like
Sunshine.