• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Anyone besides me annoyed by the original NF Excalibur blowing up.

Hartzilla2007

Vice Admiral
Admiral
While I know its been some time scince Peter David decided to blow up the original Excal, it's still annoying I mean We never get to see the Ambassador-class much so its nice that an Ambassador-class is used because I see it as a 24th century Connie. Then David goes and blows it up so he can use a Galaxy which we already saw a lot of in TNG series and the TNG novels set during the series. I mean I like the new Excal. but was it really necesary to destroy the old one.
 
It was a cost-cutting move. With NF and TNG in simultaneous production, it was more efficient to redress the Enterprise-D sets to stand in for the new Excalibur, thereby saving rental space for additional soundstages to house the sets for a separate ship.






What?
 
I'm just waiting for him to destroy the Excal-A and then get given a Sovereign for the Excal-B (following Enterprise's transition of ships...)
 
Plus, David's CGI just sucked for the Galaxy class. He should have used miniatures like he did with the earlier novels.
 
It would have saved us from the eye-rolling "hot rod" crap about the new one.
 
I wasn't annoyed... Just confused. As the first NF book I read was Requiem. The one straight after it 'blew up'.....

Which btw, made me buy all his novels, and basicaly start reading ST Fiction XD
 
While I know its been some time scince Peter David decided to blow up the original Excal, it's still annoying I mean We never get to see the Ambassador-class much so its nice that an Ambassador-class is used because I see it as a 24th century Connie. Then David goes and blows it up so he can use a Galaxy which we already saw a lot of in TNG series and the TNG novels set during the series. I mean I like the new Excal. but was it really necesary to destroy the old one.

That was nowhere near as annoying as having the Trident, Shelby's new command, as a brand-new Galaxy class ship, but with a ridiculously low registry number of NCC-31347. I'm not a ST novelist, and even I know that's wrong.
 
The only thing that bothered me about the ship being destroyed was the fact that afterwards he split the cast across the two ships. Although newer ones have still been pretty good, it just hasn't been the same since he split them up.
 
That was nowhere near as annoying as having the Trident, Shelby's new command, as a brand-new Galaxy class ship, but with a ridiculously low registry number of NCC-31347. I'm not a ST novelist, and even I know that's wrong.

I agree. I was so filled with RAGE when I read that registry number, it took weeks worth of sessions with my therapist to finally get over it. And lots and lots of Paxil.
 
Note to self: Be sure to use really low registry numbers for ships in next 24th century Trek book. Oh, and buy popcorn.
 
Honestly, neither the inexplicable blowing up (immediately after I finished that book, I went, "Wait, what?" and went back to read the last chapter again and found, no, I didn't miss anything) or the Trident's registry/class missmatch get to me as much as the stupid-sounding "Excal" nickname. I think it's worse than "the Bucket and the Beast" from the new BSG, and that's hard to pull off (and it was so horrible they stopped using it after one episode because random people on the set started bitching about how much they hated it).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top