I'd like to open up a discussion to see if it's possible to reconcile certain apparent contradictions between TOS and subsequent TREKs.
It has been suggested that in TOS the actual matter-antimatter fusion takes place in the nacelles, apart from the two "main" hulls of the Enterprise. By contrast, from TMP forward it seemed that M/AM fusion to taking place in the secondary hull, in either part of all of that tube (or in a chamber off to the side that is somehow connected to that tube). TNG seemed to extend that TMP analogy, making the fusion reactor look like a big, pot-bellied stove. ENT seemed to "steam punk" the TNG analogy by making the "stove" look like an old steam locomotive engine.
Is there any way to reconcile the original "pods" concept with the "tube"/"stove" concept to unify these various ideas into something more coherent?
It has been suggested that in TOS the actual matter-antimatter fusion takes place in the nacelles, apart from the two "main" hulls of the Enterprise. By contrast, from TMP forward it seemed that M/AM fusion to taking place in the secondary hull, in either part of all of that tube (or in a chamber off to the side that is somehow connected to that tube). TNG seemed to extend that TMP analogy, making the fusion reactor look like a big, pot-bellied stove. ENT seemed to "steam punk" the TNG analogy by making the "stove" look like an old steam locomotive engine.
Is there any way to reconcile the original "pods" concept with the "tube"/"stove" concept to unify these various ideas into something more coherent?