• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why not just use the pilot design?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean, look at it:
Uhhh...did you mean to post an image of the Hallmark ornament? Your photo of the Enterprise looks so much more spectacular than this one. :lol:

196619407tpmg4.jpg

I did not mean to post this photo, I meant to post exactly what I posted.

And while I have this ornament the one I was looking at that spawned this thread is the one released a couple years back.

THIS ONE.
 
Indeed. If "Joe on the street" recognizes the original Enterprise, he'll recognize the new Enterprise.

"Flying saucer with a thing underneath with two glowing things on sticks" is how most people will see it. They don't give two sloppy shits if the saucer is bigger or if the pylons are slightly curved or if the warp engines are a little closer.
 

That is so beutiful. It pains me that we are being denied this work of art, and being given that piece of shit instead.

Given the big similarities between the new movie-Enterprise and the Koernerprise, I don't understand you POV.

I don't see all that many similarities.

The secondary hull alone is drasticly different.
 
I find it ironic that the image in the OP isn't really of the original pilot version Enterprise.
 
I find it ironic that the image in the OP isn't really of the original pilot version Enterprise.

Yes, I noticed that too.
Whenever some of the purists now post a picture of the 'real' Enterprise, it more often than not is one of the (childhood-raping) TOS-R images. :D
 
I think the original enterprise is iconic - and you know what's it's use here would have signalled?

same old shit kids, like your daddy watched.


That's pretty much how I feel. It's not like the original Enterprise would look bad by today's standards (the interiors would, another story) it's just that it doesn't fit the movie's MO.

For better or worse, the message of this movie is "you should come see it precisely because it doesn't look like it used to!"

So if you don't like that, it's a judgment call, but I don't think you can argue with the reasoning behind changing it.

I don't think the new design is a major change. The way you're talking you'd think they painted the ship pink and added 6 nacelles. It's tweaked a bit, but probably 85-90% identical to the ship you wanted to see. I just don't get the beef here. It's the same look, just slightly different.
 
I don't think the new design is a major change. The way you're talking you'd think they painted the ship pink and added 6 nacelles. It's tweaked a bit, but probably 85-90% identical to the ship you wanted to see. I just don't get the beef here. It's the same look, just slightly different.

The nacelle pylons are much further up and back on the secondary hull which itself has an intercut that goes further back on the ship, the neck attatches much further back on the secondary hull, the nacelles are very different themselves, I mean the list goes on.

It's got *some* grace and "beauty" to it. But it's not the Enterprise.
 
That is so beutiful. It pains me that we are being denied this work of art, and being given that piece of shit instead.

Given the big similarities between the new movie-Enterprise and the Koernerprise, I don't understand you POV.

I don't see all that many similarities.

The secondary hull alone is drasticly different.

By drastically, do we mean that the underside aft is curved more? Because, frankly, your average viewer isn't going to notice. Heck, I barely noticed. I'm even more astounded that they decided to keep the exposed-radar-dish-as-deflector-dish idea, when it had been missing from most Enterprises since 1978.
 
Tell you what

When Paramount pays 150 million dollars to make a movie and they'd rather not use a VERY OLD design, it's their money.

I tend to agree with them.

This has to look NEW or it will NOT get the general movie going public to want to see it.

I'm sure it will look spectacular. And NOT exactly the same as a 42 year old tv show. Which is a good thing, you know.
 
The nacelle pylons are much further up and back on the secondary hull which itself has an intercut that goes further back on the ship, the neck attatches much further back on the secondary hull, the nacelles are very different themselves, I mean the list goes on.

You realize none of that matters at all. The ship is clearly recognizable as the Enterprise.

It's got *some* grace and "beauty" to it. But it's not the Enterprise.

Actually, it is the Enterprise. Many designs have carried that name, this is simply one more. And truth to tell, it looks a lot closer to the original Enterprise than any of the others.
 
I love the original Enterprise design - both versions. It would've been great to see a slightly more detailed version on screen. Its both functional and elegant. I understand why they changed it, though, and while I have issues with the new ship - mostly centering around the shape of the secondary hull and dorsal - I think its an attractive design from many angles. I'm content. Not ecstatic, but content.
 

That is so beutiful. It pains me that we are being denied this work of art, and being given that piece of shit instead.

Piece of shit, eh? My, aren't we the eloquent one. How about, 'from the little I've seen of the new design I like the old one better'? No, I guess you're a 'piece of shit' kinda guy.

Thanks for classing up the forum.
 
This is the pilot Enterprise:
wherenomanhasgone141.jpg

I like how it's shiny yet devoid of detail. That should translate well to the big screen.

You're judging it on 1960s model making a model filming techniques. Take the same basic design, run it past some talented CG artists with multi-million dollar budgets and the same design could've been awe inspring.

It could've had more details to it, more realistic lighting and texturing, etc, etc, etc.

Don't judge the design of the ship on 40+ year old filming techniques. Aside from the thing having chrome fenders on it I don't see how a design can look dated and looking dated (to us) or not it's the design established for the time period.

The Abrahmsprise doesn't fit the design lineage and it makes zero sense to me to change the design at all when this classic beauty could've been tweaked just a little bit and made gorgeous on the big screen. I mean, really, it could've been just tear to your eye wonderful.

Think of it just a moment, and I guess I'm talking mostly to people who're fans of TOS, how GREAT it would've been to a greatly rendered Classic Enterprise on the big screen.

Frankly I think this design lacks inspiration and creativity. Because TPTB looked at the Enterprise TOS and said, "Ugh. Looks too dated. We need something nifty and cool to sell the public!" and they came up with this. Rather than trying to think of ways to take the established design and make very minor changes to it and the texture to make it look great on the big screen.

This design is OK, I don't really hate it it just doesn't inspiring anything in me and doesn't make me feel like it is the Enterprise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top