That salt critter had a total disregard for intelligent life, and it deserved what it got. It was trying to kill again when McCoy shot it.
^^ To have a long conversation as Bones at the conference table, I think she would have had some inkling of what humans were like.
And having lived with Crater all those years, she would have picked something up about human nature. Her species was not a simple instinctual one; there are ruins scattered around the planet, as we see it, and Crater indicates they had a civilization.
The monsta made Crater happy for a long time after it killed Nancy. But she could have been like the poor, lonely beaver back home at the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum in my hometown of Tucson: she has a lovely home with fish and fowl for company, and all she can eat and great health care; but the keeper said she was still neurotic from being the last one of her kind left.I guess this is convincing enough for me. Perhaps the last survivor was a bit less civilized in the builder-of-civilizations sense than its ancestors had been, but yes, it might still have been enough of a conversationalist to actually do its own lines. And thus be somewhat culpable of realizing what the humans wanted of it and failing to comply.
Timo Saloniemi
In "The Man Trap," Dr. Crater and the creature in disguise as Dr. McCoy make the argument that the creature is not killing out of malice or evil, but rather simply using its natural abilities to survive. They suggest offering the creature salt openly and without deception, as when its need for salt is met it has no reason to kill. This seems confirmed in the fact that Dr. Crater, when providing the creature with salt, was left unharmed.
So, my question is... was it the right or wrong decision to kill the creature -- and thereby cause its species to be extinct -- given the circumstances? Given the Federation's philosophy of respecting all life, no matter how different from our own, would it not have been a more appropriate decision to find a way to meet the creature's needs and avoid future harm? Or does the threat the creature poses when deprived of salt justify the action they took?
If this is in response to my musings, I did not mean to imply it could have had any appreciable affect on the extinction... until the very end. Say the species is down to the last 20 or less, what if "our" Nancy got a little bit hungry.it's unlikely that "our" vampire would have made a major contribution to the extinction, then, even if it had cannibalized the last survivors within its reach.
So, my question is... was it the right or wrong decision to kill the creature -- and thereby cause its species to be extinct -- given the circumstances?
If McCoy wanted to be cruel, he could have just injured the creature with the phaser... and then poured salt in the wound.![]()
I think the simplest answers are right there. The creature is an ALIEN, and as such it doesn't think like us. Who can possibly know what it thought, how it perceived the situation, and what kinds of emotions drove it. Think of it this way, it spends years in Crater's company, and that's its whole barometer for human behavior. Crater seems to dislike and distrust them, and they're brash and pushy. Given this, it's entirely possible the thing felt threatened by Kirk and company from the get go, and when they good Captain doesn't immediately fulfill the request for salt, maybe it believed there would be no salt, so it went after it.
For the record, Kirk's introductory log entry identifies the planet as having an ``ancient and long-dead civilization''. I know this doesn't contradict what you're saying, but I do want to establish how long the lifespan would have to be for the creature to have lived before the city died.No doubt the creature had a limited lifespan, although perhaps a bit longer than the human one. It's theoretically possible that the cityscape we saw fell in ruins within such a lifespan, perhaps due to a radical climate change or the use of powerful weapons. But it's just as possible that the city had fallen generations prior, and that the last of the species had been living in assorted mudholes for those generations.
As long as we're getting into questions of moral culpability I'd like to point out we don't have evidence that the salt vampire was one of the species that built the civilization, rather than being the trusty pets of that species. Note that it's compared to the buffalo and the passenger pigeon rather than, say, the Last Neanderthal. Many people will have different feelings about killing a dangerous person compared to killing a dangerous animal.Perhaps instinct trumped intelligence. The creature was receiving tablets of pure salt from Crater, not sucking it straight from his veins. Given the opportunity to get the "real thing", it just went nuts.
As long as we're getting into questions of moral culpability I'd like to point out we don't have evidence that the salt vampire was one of the species that built the civilization, rather than being the trusty pets of that species. Note that it's compared to the buffalo and the passenger pigeon rather than, say, the Last Neanderthal. Many people will have different feelings about killing a dangerous person compared to killing a dangerous animal.
Perhaps the Salt Vampires of whom Nancy was the last specimen dwindled to extinction after suffereing an intellectual "devolution" (just as certain of our comparatively feeble muscles were no doubt more developed in our robust pre-hominid ancestors, so may the brains of our descendents be much feebler than those we now have) and thus would be akin to the aquatic humans of Vonnegut's Galapagos or the green Sleestak of Land of the Lost (as opposed to Eneg the brown time traveler). Intellect may have evolved into a razor fine animal cunning. (This kind of evolution of intelligence seems highly plausible to me--look how far such a mutation took George W. Bush and he's successfully reproduced. See also C.M. Kornbluth's "The Marching Morons" and even Idiocracy.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.