I like it, a nice gap between the two eras. However, does anyone one else feel that she looks, strange? I donno, something about her makes her seem out or proportion. Not a knock on the modeler or anything, he did a fantastic job, but it was something that was bothering me.
I like Dennis's model better, even if this isn't a final render.
![]()
![]()
Overall I prefer the lines of Dennis', although his saucer doesn't have enough windows.
Don't care for it. Change is fine, but this is just change for the sake of change.
My saucer has the windows indicated on Jefferies' design drawings and on the artwork actually prepared by the Phase II production, interpolated with the TOS configuration rather than the ST:TMP version where there was no information available.
Perfect example of douchebaggery, thank you for the simulation.Don't care for it. Change is fine, but this is just change for the sake of change.
Hilarious considering your signature and pic.![]()
I ignored the Berkeley poster with its many additional badly-placed windows ...
A shame that Darren's model appears to be based pretty heavily on the Berkley image, including the freaky windows around the saucer, too-thick saucer rim, squatty pylons, large sensor dome and blue nacelle caps. Over on TrekMovie, he claims to have built the model from Jeffries' blueprints, and implies this is the first time anyone has done so, but I have serious doubts. Ick.
Who is Jeffries?![]()
Who is Jeffries?![]()
Matt Jefferies, who designed the Enterprise.
I knew it all along!![]()
![]()
I like Dennis's model better, even if this isn't a final render.
![]()
![]()
But there's nothing wrong with the version they went with.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.