• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Oh for cryin' out loud! (Uncle SPOILERS)

gastrof

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
That Trek Today article about Brad William Henke playing "Uncle Frank"...

Come on! What is it with onscreen stories these days? (Movies and TV shows!)

Can't a hero or a villain make it to adulthood without having been abused in some way by a father figure?!?!?

Kirk didn't need to have been abused as a kid to have become the man we know him to be.

This is something I think just stinks. There was no need for this.

I think it's a mindless trend. Sort of like how the cable channel TNT wanted BABYLON FIVE'S creator to have a main character raped in an episode of CRUSADE. "It'll be a real attention getter!" they insisted.

He refused.

A shame JJ didn't say the same thing to his writers....

Or to himself.
 
Can't a hero or a villain make it to adulthood without having been abused in some way by a father figure?!?!?.

Spock was emotionally abused by his father.

Fact.

Didn't hurt the character none. Seems ta me that they got a halfway decent story out of it.
 
In JOURNEY TO BABEL, the only indication of a problem between Spock and Sarek is the fact Spock wouldn't set course in the direction Sarek wanted, and instead joined Starfleet.

Even later, in the films, we see Sarek so concerned about Spock that he journeys to Earth to confront Kirk on what he believes to be a careless choice.

In the "Final Frontier" flashback to Spock's birth, Sarek's "So human..." could mean anything.

Besides, when do fathers and sons ever get along perfectly? That doesn't have to mean "abuse". Even in the best of marriages, husbands and wives occasionally disagree or get grumpy with each other. That's not abuse either.

Let's not call a skinned knee a dismemberment.
 
Let's not call a skinned knee a dismemberment.

And yet you started a thread over the suggestion that Kirk's uncle used to get drunk and abusive.

Your reply carries no meaning I can see.

Yes, I started this thread, and I did not call a skinned knee a dismemberment. I said it's a mindless trend in onscreen fiction these days. Make a character "exciting" by having them come from abuse.

How...empty.

The matter of Sarek and Spock was not what it was suggested as being, and so the comparison was made.
 
I got to say, the abusive uncle cliche is very tired. Jeez, like I really need to see Kirk as a kid ducking a bottle of Jack Daniels or Saurian brandy being thrown at him by some white trash bum in his forties screaming "You get back here you pansy. What's wrong, scared? If you're scared of me, your'e scared of life. And if you're scared of life, than you might as well crawl back up your mamma's pussy, because that's the only way to avoid your problems."

And this is what motivates Kirk to join Starfleet? Jeez, that's just a story that didn't have to be told.
 
I, on the other hand, am starting to think that Star Trek XI may not revolutionize my life and make all my problems go away.

And I don't like that. Not one bit.
 
Have absolutely no problem with it. Family upbringing both good and bad often have an extremely powerful influence on what type of person we become.

And its is hardly an angle that hasn't been used in Trek before.

Picard emotionally abused in his family, Spock emotionally abused in his youth. Even the creators of classic Trek expanded upon that in the animated series in the one episode they have even referred two in live action.

After all it is supposed to be uplifting for characters to face the challenges of their past and rise above them. So why should this be different?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top