^Wayne tower was really lousily built already 

Take for example a key turning point in the film. Warning: MASSIVE SPOILERS follow: Joker kidnaps Rachel Dawes and Harvey Dent, placing them in separate rooms wired to explode along with a phone so they can hear one another die. Joker then provides Batman with both addresses, allowing him to pick which one to save. Batman chooses Rachel, sending Gordon after Dent. However, when Batman arrives, he realizes he's been duped as Joker's switched the addresses. Rachel, having rightly believed Batman would come for her, hears Dent being rescued and is crestfallen thinking Dent was chosen over her.
There's that too. It's more plausible than simply buying a new building just for the hell of it. I didn't think of it when I made my post and forgot that someone mentioned it a day or so ago.Or another thought would be that when the monorail train went through the tower in Begins, it caused enough structural damage that it was unsafe. So, they either built a new one, or more likely for the time frame, Bruce bought out another builfing and renamed it.Someone suggested that Bruce made some changes that included moving Wayne Enterprises to a more modest building. Works for me. As for the change in Gotham's look between movies, yeah it is jarring, but oddly enough I'm finding myself more displeased with Batman Begins for not matching up with The Dark Knight and not the other way around.I was just put off, a bit, but how much Gotham "changed' between the movies. Not the least of which with Wayne Tower.
![]()
A fine review, JA. But I must quibble.
Take for example a key turning point in the film. Warning: MASSIVE SPOILERS follow: Joker kidnaps Rachel Dawes and Harvey Dent, placing them in separate rooms wired to explode along with a phone so they can hear one another die. Joker then provides Batman with both addresses, allowing him to pick which one to save. Batman chooses Rachel, sending Gordon after Dent. However, when Batman arrives, he realizes he's been duped as Joker's switched the addresses. Rachel, having rightly believed Batman would come for her, hears Dent being rescued and is crestfallen thinking Dent was chosen over her.
How did you get crestfallen from Gyllenhaal in this scene? Rachel seems nothing but relieved to realize Batman has saved Harvey rather than her. She's just spent the last few minutes telling him she didn't want to be the one who was saved. Granted there is an undercurrent of, Oh, shit, I'm about to die - but it seemed to me there's a really fine bit of subtext here in which Rachel has her faith in Bruce restored in the last seconds of her life. She expected him to do the selfish thing (and of course, he tried to) and save her due to his own personal feelings, rather than save Harvey, for the good of Gotham. Not knowing that he didn't mean to save Harvey, she gets to die believing he's better than she thought he was. It's another example of the complex of twisted emotions the Nolan's bring off in this film.
^ Do we know that she knew that it was Batman that saved Harvey? i don't remember everything about the scene.
Of course she didn't know that Batman found out did she?^ Do we know that she knew that it was Batman that saved Harvey? i don't remember everything about the scene.
It was difficult to pinpoint what exactly Rachel knew, but I suspect she realized once Batman found out that he would try and save either or both.
At the beginning of the movie there were a number of Batman imitators. They made their own costumes and had their own equipment and weapons. Is Bruce really different than these guys? I was thinking probably not. Aside from taking the time to train himself, he's just richer and can afford better equipment.
Of course she didn't know that Batman found out did she?^ Do we know that she knew that it was Batman that saved Harvey? i don't remember everything about the scene.
It was difficult to pinpoint what exactly Rachel knew, but I suspect she realized once Batman found out that he would try and save either or both.
Well, he's not running around with guns trying to kill people. In fact, he's trying to avoid killing folks.At the beginning of the movie there were a number of Batman imitators. They made their own costumes and had their own equipment and weapons. Is Bruce really different than these guys? I was thinking probably not. Aside from taking the time to train himself, he's just richer and can afford better equipment.
I've always thought Nicholson's take was severly underrated by the fans, but I gotta agree it looks hammy as HELL next to what Ledger did with it.![]()
Well, he's not running around with guns trying to kill people. In fact, he's trying to avoid killing folks.At the beginning of the movie there were a number of Batman imitators. They made their own costumes and had their own equipment and weapons. Is Bruce really different than these guys? I was thinking probably not. Aside from taking the time to train himself, he's just richer and can afford better equipment.
Well, he's not running around with guns trying to kill people. In fact, he's trying to avoid killing folks.At the beginning of the movie there were a number of Batman imitators. They made their own costumes and had their own equipment and weapons. Is Bruce really different than these guys? I was thinking probably not. Aside from taking the time to train himself, he's just richer and can afford better equipment.
Which is why I thought it might have been more appropriate for Batman to say something along the lines of "Because I don't need guns" or somesuch rather than the "hockey pads" comment.
One of the things I didn't like about the movie was how Harvey Dent's fall from grace was treated by Batman & Gordon as such a catastrophe in terms of their fight against organized crime. Like, if any of the public ever saw the slightest tarnish on Dent's reputation, it would throw the masses into such despair that they would never recover. I didn't like that they seem to hold so little regard for the people of Gotham that they need to be lied to just so that they'll go along with the right thing.
For that matter, I wouldn't think it was Dent's incorruptible reputation that made him so unique but rather his fearlessness. Like Gordon said in Batman Begins, what they really needed was a D.A. brave enough to prosecute without fear of mob reprisals. In that respect, it doesn't really matter how Dent died. The fact that he died at all is what might terrorize the people into submission to the mob again.
One of the things I didn't like about the movie was how Harvey Dent's fall from grace was treated by Batman & Gordon as such a catastrophe in terms of their fight against organized crime. Like, if any of the public ever saw the slightest tarnish on Dent's reputation, it would throw the masses into such despair that they would never recover. I didn't like that they seem to hold so little regard for the people of Gotham that they need to be lied to just so that they'll go along with the right thing.
Dent's reputation is already tarnished. There are people out there who have seen his bad side (no pun intended). What if word gets around?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.